Fritter
Active Member
I thought the approved 427 extention had a slight north WEST direction to it.
They'll have to determine how profitable is the current 407 EAST/412/418 network before they'll even consider building another toll freeway. The 407 EAST is built in quite an rural area. I doubt they have 1/10th of the traffic the 407 is receiving between the 427 and 400.my understanding was that it was considered likely to be tolled given its high construction costs.
No big deal. A 427 extension up north can serve Bolton and all the community parallel to Highway 50. It needs to curve there as it's much more difficult to go straight up the current 427 location with protected conservation land just past Bolton.I thought the approved 427 extention had a slight north WEST direction to it.
$$$Everyone, please answer this question: https://www.quora.com/unanswered/Wh...407-from-Donald-Cousens-Parkway-NB-in-Toronto
I envision the 427 eventually meeting with Highway 11 around Orillia. MTO always wanted to either expand Hwy 11 to a 6 lane full freeway or bypass the entire stretch which they can do with the 427.
Pure fantasy, but extend 427 parallel to 400.I envision the 427 eventually meeting with Highway 11 around Orillia. MTO always wanted to either expand Hwy 11 to a 6 lane full freeway or bypass the entire stretch which they can do with the 427.
Nothing major, just minor fixes to the bridges/overpasses. I which they were widening it or reconfiguring it completely (never happening soon).not sure if this has been discussed earlier in this thread but what is going on with the 401/dvp interchange? Are they just rehabbing that section of bridge or are they widening it?
Nothing major, just minor fixes to the bridges/overpasses. I which they were widening it or reconfiguring it completely (never happening soon).
Would a 2-lane, 6 flyover, 4 level stack interchange even be possible for this interchange reconfiguration? Or even efficient?-_-...man...it's been just rubble and construction for months.... I actually was a bit optimistic....but come to think about the pace....if theyre taking THIS long just to do "minor" repairs imagine how many decades it would take to do a reconfig
if it ever happens...
Would a 2-lane, 6 flyover, 4 level stack interchange even be possible for this interchange reconfiguration? Or even efficient?
How many $B would this cost?Oh absolutely, if you have the money to build it and drivers have the patience to sit through years of construction and retrofits to configure the thing. Plus NIMBYs that will complain that the 4 level high monster would be urban blight.
Could look something like this one in Houston, I-10 being the 401:
https://www.google.ca/maps/@29.784512,-95.5632596,1045m/data=!3m1!1e3