W. K. Lis
Superstar
Refresher driver lesson courses should be mandated, every ten to twenty-five years. Depending upon their driving record.
I was confused when this rule changed. I thought initially it covered crosswalks at intersections, but I thought it was clarified to mean only mid-block crossings. If it applied to intersections it would really create havoc. We would need to have dedicated phases for turning and pedestrian crossing.A pet peeve - very few people understand the HTO meaning of the term "crossover". Common usage (and historical, pre-nonverbal signage, actually) terms this a "crosswalk".
The rules for yielding right of way to pedestrians at a controlled intersection gets trampled as a result. When people hear discussion of "crosswalks" they assume the discussion is about mid-block crossovers, not intersections.
Another example of how terminology (and rules) may have changed since many took driving lessons.
- Paul
I was confused when this rule changed. I thought initially it covered crosswalks at intersections, but I thought it was clarified to mean only mid-block crossings. If it applied to intersections it would really create havoc. We would need to have dedicated phases for turning and pedestrian crossing.
I'm not exactly sure it did change, and if it did it was many moons ago. I recall learning the 'crosswalk'-'crossover' in traffic training in the '70s. As I recall the old text signage, they used the term pedestrian 'crossing' (or X-ing), which is neither.
I just had to follow this one all the way down the rabbit hole, and right you are.
Here's the Toronto Star, June 19, 1959 (a very long ways before I got driver training, I would add). The safety campaign at the time was to encourage people to point to indicate to drivers that they intended to cross. Crosswalks had first been implemented the year before....There were no buttons to push back then!
I do recall my grandfather ranting about the new crosswalks.... "How preposterous that someone can just stick out their arm and make me stop my car....."
I also found an article April 6 1964 deploring the rate of accidents at crosswalks, and suggesting buttons and lights... it too showed a sign reading Pedestrian Crossing. Neither article used the term crossover.
- Paul
PS: The 1959 article states that police statistics show that the pedestrian was found at fault in 80% of all pedestrian incidents.
View attachment 330191
Need to see an optometrist. Can't see the cycling lanes/paths.
They can reduce the car lanes on O'Connor east of St. Clair.None have ever been contemplated for O'Connor in this area; and there is no way they can 'diet' this section of O'Connor in isolation.
They can reduce the car lanes on O'Connor east of St. Clair.
With O'Connor only 4 lanes to the west of St. Clair, we don't need both St. Clair and O'Connor as 4 lanes to the east.
Yeah ... I don't know how you achieve that without an additional bridge - or at least some kind of widening of the existing bridge.Though, if you want bike lanes on O'Connor, and retaining a 4-lane O'Connor to the south-west, a solution is required to get cyclists safely to Woodbine.
Amazing that they kept sidewalks in that part of town.Yeah ... I don't know how you achieve that without an additional bridge - or at least some kind of widening of the existing bridge.
You've essentially got two arteries, joining briefly, and then carrying on. It's always been a bottleneck.Amazing that they kept sidewalks in that part of town.