News   Apr 28, 2026
 503     0 
News   Apr 28, 2026
 5.9K     12 
News   Apr 28, 2026
 986     2 

Premier Doug Ford's Ontario


Ontario solicitor general sought 3-row, 8-seat replacement after vehicle stolen​


The minister in charge of law and order in Ontario insisted on a three-row replacement government vehicle and asked about how it could be customized, Global News can reveal, after his car was broken into twice in the space of three months.


70c8fc80

Solicitor General Michael Kerzner’s government vehicle was stolen from the parking lot of a Home Depot near Premier Doug Ford’s home in July 2024 and eventually recovered by Ontario Provincial Police.

After months of expensive repairs, it was returned to the minister’s care in late October of the same year, before being broken into and badly damaged within days.

According to a series of internal emails and invoices obtained by Global News using freedom of information laws, the minister’s office ruled out any replacement vehicles that didn’t have three rows.

Staff also complained rental replacements were insufficient and asked what customizations could be made to new vehicles during two repair jobs that were billed to the Ministry of Solicitor General for more than $39,000.

The emails show Kerzner’s office spent months considering alternatives while his stolen vehicle was down for repairs, giving civil servants specifications on what size he would accept.

But they ultimately decided to wait.

The vehicle was first stolen in July 2024, and repairs were finished in October, largely because of a backlog in parts.

The minister’s office said staff had looked for the replacements because of how long the car was down for repairs, but eventually decided to stick with the mended car.

A spokesperson said in a statement that the civil service manages vehicle purchases and replacements.

“Vehicles for Cabinet Ministers are chosen from a pre-approved Vendor of Record list to ensure vehicles purchased are cost effective while meeting operational needs,” they wrote.

Critics argue that the energy Kerzner and his staff spent trying to source him a three-row replacement vehicle was a sign of misplaced priorities.

“I guess when you think it’s OK for the premier to buy a luxury private jet, $40,000 to trick out your government ride is small potatoes,” Ontario Liberal interim leader John Fraser said.

“The solicitor general should spend more time worrying about the 150 criminals he let out by mistake than dwelling on his personal needs for his government vehicle.”

Vehicle stolen near premier’s house​

The documents obtained by Global News show Kerzner’s vehicle was first stolen at the Home Depot in Etobicoke, where Premier Ford said he had threatened to give an alleged shoplifter “a beating.

Kerzner is one of at least four ministers who have had their government vehicles stolen in recent years.

According to an incident report filed after the event, the vehicle was stolen on July 11, 2024, and eventually recovered. When officers were able to get it back, the interior had been severely damaged, with repair work estimated at over $20,000.

Soon after the theft, Kerzner’s staff started sending regular messages to the civil servants who look after government vehicles, complaining about the rental the minister had been given and asking if they could get a new car.

“Is it possible to order the Minister a new car and use this one for the fleet service?” one staffer wrote in August 2024.

“The rental was sufficient for a couple of weeks on short-notice but we require a more permanent solution. We have concerns about costs with the rental car and that the size doesn’t meet our ongoing requirements.”


Minister demanded larger car

What followed was a series of messages between Kerzner’s staff and civil servants in which the minister appeared to reject several replacement vehicles, including a Nissan Pathfinder and VW Atlas.

Early in the process, Kerzner’s staff made it clear he wouldn’t accept any vehicle with fewer than three rows and eight seats for his official government car.

“If you know off the top that any of these models are not 3-rows that seat 7-8 passengers, feel free to remove them from consideration,” one message read.

It’s not clear why Kerzner would need to carry eight passengers in his government vehicle.

Another email underscored the ask. “Can you please do a search for a new Toyota Grand Highlander and any of the others you listed below which have a third row?” one of Kerzner’s advisers wrote. “I believe, for example, the Hyundai Palisade has a third row.” As they considered alternatives, Kerzner’s staff also tried to work out what additions could be made to any new vehicle. “Do you have the specs for Minister Kerzner’s current Grand Highlander?” one wrote. “He mentioned to me that his Grand Highlander has some customizations and I’m curious how it compares to the Nissan Pathfinder that Holman found.”

Global News asked Kerzner’s office why the minister needed a three-row vehicle, but they did not address the question.



Kerzner directly involved in push for answers​



Delays in delivering parts for the stolen, damaged Toyota Grand Highlander saw the replacement process drag on through the summer and into the fall.

As weeks turned into months, the requests from the solicitor general’s staff grew more urgent, referencing his desire to resolve the issue.

“The Minister is in the office tomorrow, so ideally searches are concluded today,” one email read.

A few days later, Kerzner intervened directly, asking for a Microsoft Teams call with the civil servants in charge of fleet vehicles.

“Are you available at 3pm for a Teams call? Minister Kerzner had a few questions on the vehicle available and options for his current Highlander,” a staffer wrote. “Might be easier for him to ask you directly.”

An email sent the next day suggested the call went ahead as planned.



Car returned, broken into again​



Sometime toward the end of October, after a series of delays in parts and repairs, Kerzner’s Toyota Grand Highlander was rehabilitated.

Then, someone tried to steal it again.

“I want to start off by thanking you for all the help with getting the Minister’s car fixed,” an email from one staffer to the government’s fleet services on Oct. 31, 2024, began.

“I wanted to let you know that the car was broken into last night in an attempt to steal it. It being towed to the shop where it was just fixed. (The driver) will be getting a rental car in the meantime.”

The estimated repair bill for the second incident was $18,790.88, taking the total cost over a matter of months to more than $39,000.

Days later, staff began to ask again for alternatives to the rental vehicle Kerzner had been given.

“While we appreciate the additional 30-days on the loaner, having the loaner until November 6th would be an untenable situation,” they wrote.
Last year my soccer team had someone new join for a couple seasons and it was Kerzner's chief of staff. The guy was friendly but on short notice he would suddenly not be able to make games and at the time I joked he was busy dealing with scandals and putting out fires... probably had more truth than I expected lol
 


An overwhelming majority of Ontarians oppose the government’s decision to buy a private jet for the premier’s use, and more than half of past PC voters say it makes them less likely to vote for the party again, according to a new poll.


Last Friday, the premier’s office confirmed that the government had bought a Challenger 650, citing Premier Doug Ford’s “extensive travel” within Ontario, across Canada and to the United States, mentioning no other uses for the plane.


On Sunday, his office then announced that, after hearing from Ontarians, Ford had decided to sell the plane back. On Wednesday, the premier announced that the government had already done so.


In the meantime, Ford has defended the decision to buy the 12-seater business jet in the first place, saying that it was never supposed to be “Doug Ford’s plane” and would have had other uses, such as transporting other cabinet ministers and aiding in emergencies.


He said Tuesday he’s been speaking with Ontarians about it since, and once he’s explained that, at least half have told him they think it’s a good idea.


“Right now it’s 50-50, probably even higher on the ‘keep the plane’ side now,” Ford said.


Shortly after that media conference, Pallas Data put a poll into the field, asking Ontarians on Tuesday and Wednesday for their views on the plane purchase.


Initially asked if they “support or oppose the Ontario government's decision to buy a private jet for $28.9-million to be used for the premier's travel,” 79 per cent of respondents said they oppose it, with 65 per cent opposing it “strongly.”



Just 18 per cent of respondents said they support it, eight per cent “strongly.”


A majority of respondents who identified as PC supporters — 54 per cent — still opposed the purchase.

That shifted, somewhat, when presented with the premier’s explanation.


Respondents were told that Ford “has since promised to sell the plane, but says he should have been clear in the first place that it would have been used for more government purposes than just his own travel, including transporting other government ministers and assisting in emergencies,” and that they could reconsider their view on the plane.


Opposition to the sale shrunk to 74 per cent (from 79 per cent) and to 45 per cent (from 54 per cent) among PC supporters. Supporters of other parties were largely unmoved.


Pollster Joseph Angolano said the findings suggest Ford is mostly hearing from PC voters when he talks to people on his phone or at events.


“The explanation lands among some PC voters, which is good for the premier, but the explanation is not landing with everybody else,” Angolano said.


The poll also asked if people’s support for the PCs was affected by the plane purchase.


It found that 18 per cent of people said they’d voted in the PC party in the past and, considering the plane purchase, won’t vote for the party in the future. Another 14 per cent said they’d voted PC in the past but the plane purchase makes them less likely to vote PC in the future.


Meanwhile, 26 per cent said they’d voted PC in the past and they’ll vote PC again in the future.


The remainder of voters said they hadn’t voted PC in the past, and a few — five per cent — said they’re more likely to, now.

Angolano said this shows that when people are thinking about the jet purchase, their support for the PCs falls to its historic low — the base of roughly 30 per cent of voters that the party can rely on, but doesn’t win elections for it.


“The good news for the premier is that this is happening today, and the election is three years from now, and whether the voters will have a long enough memory to remember this is to be seen,” he said. “Generally, people tend to have a short-term memory when it comes to errors by politicians of this nature.”


“There's a lot of time before the next election, but this jet purchase has stung him,” he added. “Parts of his base are looking at him a lot less favourably because of this.”


That said, the party remains in the lead. Before asking respondents any questions about the plane, the poll asked voters who they’d support in an election held tomorrow.


Among decided and leaning voters, 37 per cent said they’d vote PC, compared to 32 per cent for the Liberals, 24 per cent for the NDP and six per cent for the Greens.


That’s down from 43 per cent for the PCs in a similar Pallas poll conducted on April 8, prior to the plane news, and the lowest level of support for the party in more than two years.
 

Ford government’s controversial budget bill passes final vote at Queen’s Park​

The Ford government’s omnibus budget bill, which includes controversial changes to freedom of information (FOI) laws, passed a final vote at Queen’s Park on Thursday.


The budget bill had been sitting for several weeks at the committee stage with no movement before a rare late-session at Queen’s Park on Wednesday night to push it through.


Both the NDP and Liberal parties accused the Ford government of trying to rush through the controversial FOI changes, which would shield Ford and cabinet members from public access to documents, including the premier’s cellphone records.


A normal legislative process sees bills go to committee, where affected groups and members of the public have a chance to weigh in, and committee members from the government and opposition can propose and debate amendments. But last week House Leader Steve Clark proposed bypassing the committee sessions and public hearings in order to expedite its passing.


The bill also includes changes to the province’s conservation authorities, new rules to cap resale ticket prices, and a one-year HST rebate for new homes, among other items.


The FOI law, retroactive to January 1st, 1988, would shield Ford and cabinet members — along with their offices — from public access to documents, with Ford admitting that part of the rationale is to kill media requests to obtain his cellphone records.


The government has fast-tracked several pieces of legislation over the past year or so, including laws to ban speed cameras, close supervised consumption sites and boost the education minister’s powers, as well as a law known as Bill 5 that allows the government to suspend municipal and provincial laws in the name of mining or economic development.
 
He's entitled to his entitlements.

How does someone manage to get their car broken into twice in short succession?
A high end vehicle is very marketable offshore. I'm actually surprised they got back - twice. Maybe it has an onboard tracker the thieves forgot to disable or it has airtags or similar installed. I'm not aware the SolGen's vehicle would have any particular security additions.

It sounds like he needs to stay out of certain neighborhoods.
 

Ford government moves ahead with plan to take over Billy Bishop Airport​

The Ford government is moving ahead with its plans to expropriate Toronto’s Billy Bishop Airport, including taking control of parkland on the waterfront, amid massive backlash from the mayor’s office.

70c8fc80

Transportation Minister Prabmeet Sarkaria tabled the Building Billy Bishop Airport Act on Thursday afternoon, which would give the province the power to take control of land in and around the island travel hub.

The bill, if passed, will allow Ontario to take control of roughly one-third of Little Norway Park on the waterfront, and let the Ford government replace the City of Toronto in the tripartite agreement that manages the airport.

“We’re very excited about this,” he told reporters at Queen’s Park. “The economic potential of this, not just for the city, but the province and the country.”

Mayor Olivia Chow, however, doesn’t appear to share that excitement.

“Unilaterally taking City land is not acceptable,” she said in a statement sent shortly after the legislation was tabled.

“The province is about to uproot a complete community, take our land, and pave over Little Norway Park. That sends a signal to all Torontonians, if the province wants to, they can take land, public space and parks to pave them without the City of Toronto having a say.”

Chow tabled a motion at city council opposing the move and, among other demands, suggested the province should buy the properties of residents affected and apologize.

Exactly what the province and Billy Bishop plan to do with the land and expansion remains unclear.

Sarkaria couldn’t tell reporters on Thursday how long the new runway would need to be to accommodate jets at the airport or what the land from Little Norway Park would be used for.

There’s no timeline for the work to be completed, although the government says it intends to get started immediately.

Last month, the government announced it would designate the airport a special economic zone, where some rules and laws are suspended. The tool sparked major controversy when it was introduced.

The provincial government rushed its Bill 5, the Protect Ontario by Unleashing our Economy Act, through the legislature last year to give itself the power to declare special economic zones.

Those areas, which can be decided by Ford and his cabinet, would see environmental, provincial and local laws suspended to fast-track projects.

Ford insisted that suspending existing laws — including environmental rules — won’t have a negative impact on the area.

“We always focus on environmental issues,” the premier said previously. “We take all that into consideration. But we can’t just sit back.”
 

Province Building New OPP Detachment at Ontario Place​

Increased police presence will support upload of the Gardiner Expressway and Don Valley Parkway and enhance park safety

To support the upload of the Gardiner Expressway and Don Valley Parkway from the City of Toronto to the province, the Ontario government has launched a Request for Proposals to support the construction of a new Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) detachment on Ontario Place’s East Island. This detachment will support year-round policing at the new Ontario Place as well as traffic patrol on the Gardiner Expressway and Don Valley Parkway once the roadways are designated as King’s Highways and uploaded to the province. The detachment will include a helicopter pad, a proposed marine unit and the first OPP Mounted Unit in Ontario to enhance patrol operations at the park, which is expected to attract approximately six million visitors annually.
“Protecting Ontario starts with keeping people safe where they live, work and play, and that’s exactly what this investment delivers,” said Michael Kerzner, Solicitor General of Ontario. “This new OPP detachment will be well-positioned to patrol our highways, maintain a strong on-site policing presence and ensure the safety of families and all those visiting Ontario Place.”
The OPP detachment will be part of a new administration and maintenance complex that will replace the existing administration building at Ontario Place. The detachment will house specialized policing vehicles and operational functions required for highway patrol and onsite policing needs.
“The OPP is proud to continue working alongside the Toronto Police Service,” said Ontario Provincial Police Commissioner Thomas Carrique. “A modern and purpose-built detachment will ensure the OPP are able to maintain the safety and security of the new Ontario Place and fulfil our traffic safety responsibilities related to the Gardiner Expressway and the Don Valley Parkway being designated as King’s Highways.”
As part of the New Deal for Toronto, ownership and maintenance of the Gardiner Expressway and DVP are being transferred to the province to ensure these vital highways remain safe, reliable, toll free and in good repair, helping to fight gridlock and keeping people and goods moving across the Greater Toronto Area.

Quick Facts​

  • Consistent with other King's Highways in the City of Toronto, the OPP will be responsible for traffic patrol on the Gardiner Expressway and the Don Valley Parkway. The Toronto Police Service will maintain responsibility for all other non-traffic patrol related policing functions.
  • The province is issuing a staged Request for Proposals (RFP) to design and construct a new administrative and maintenance building and OPP Detachment as part of the Ontario Place Revitalization Project located along the East Island.
  • Mounted policing units are well-suited to large, high-traffic park and public realm settings, providing police with enhanced visibility in large crowds, accessibility to pedestrian areas and improved crowd management capability.
  • The Gardiner Expressway and DVP are nationally significant economic corridors tied to the provincial highway network, facilitating domestic and international trade, boosting GDP and supporting millions of visitors to Toronto annually.

Quotes​

"Each year, the revitalized Ontario Place is expected to welcome up to six million visitors, making it one of Ontario’s top tourism and cultural destinations. Our government is ensuring it has the strong and reliable police presence it needs year-round. The new on-site OPP detachment will strengthen public safety and help ensure visitors can enjoy Ontario Place safely and with confidence."
- Stan Cho
Minister of Tourism, Culture and Gaming
"Our government is making historic investments in highway infrastructure to fight gridlock and keep people and goods moving across Ontario. By taking ownership of the Gardiner Expressway and DVP, we are keeping these highways toll-free for the long term and helping the more than 140,000 drivers who rely on them every day get where they need to go safely and reliably."
- Prabmeet Sarkaria
Minister of Transportation
 

Billy Bishop Airport expropriation legislation includes large portions of Toronto Islands

Families living along Toronto’s waterfront say they’re growing more worried their access to precious green space is about to become more limited, as the Ford government moves to seize a strip of land near the island airport.

70c8fc80
On Thursday, the province tabled legislation to take over the City of Toronto’s portion of the tripartite agreement governing Billy Bishop Airport.

The legislation included a long expropriation list — with a third of Little Norway Park and a chunk of the Toronto Islands among the areas Queen’s Park will have permission to seize if the bill passes.

A spokesperson for the Ministry of Transportation said the park will remain parkland despite the potential expropriation.

The Toronto Port Authority — which is leading work on the airport — said the park was needed to “provide improved access to the airport in an effort to alleviate pinch-points and congestion.”

Toronto Mayor Olivia Chow remains worried the province could pave part of the park, putting up a loud, public fight against a provincial administration that city hall usually strives to work alongside.

“They want to expropriate this park and erase it,” Chow warned on Friday. “That is what we will not stand for.”

Some residents are concerned, too.

“We have a school right behind us and a daycare and a neighbourhood centre and they all come out to play here,” long-time local resident Joan Prouse said. “So I don’t think that’s fair.”

Another resident, Diane Jameson, said she was concerned about the air quality impacts a busier airport could bring.

The Ontario NDP released a list of the land the government is giving itself permission to take over. It includes large sections of the Toronto Islands, like Hanlan’s Point and the non-residential part of Ward’s Island.

“The Premier could be making life more affordable for working people, but he’d rather pick pointless fights with the City of Toronto,” NDP MPP Chris Glover said. “He needs to keep his hands off our public lands and scrap this ridiculous project.”

The Ministry of Transportation says geographic locators will be narrowed as it becomes clearer what land is needed to support the expansion.

The Port Authority suggested the new runway could need to be at least 500 metres longer than it currently is.
 
Last edited:
Good piece from Martin Regg Cohn of The Star on just how low Ontario's Welfare rates are....


From the above:

1777143294998.png


***

1777143329885.png


***

1777143368185.png


The figures on Minimum wage don't look as bad.........but that's because CPI drastically under-weights the cost of housing.

(by about 1/2 for a renter in Toronto)

Still, even allowing for that; had Kathleen Wynne's $15 minimum wage gone into effect on January 1st, 2019; and subsequently been indexed to CPI, that number would be $18.55 per hour vs the $17.60 we're at today.

That extra .95c per hour is an extra $1,852 per year for a typical full-time hourly earner (37.5 hours per week)

How disgusting that we permit government (and business) to be so miserly to the least well off.
 
What's the corruption angle here? Is someone getting kickbacks from the airlines?

I will not pretend to know the identities of the exact people who are profiting here, but expanding the airport generates more economic activity, and therefore someone is going to be financially benefiting from it. The fact that expropriating "large sections" of the Toronto Islands will be destructive to one of the nicest public realms in the entire city need not concern us, of course.

By all means let's have progress, but not the form of progress that makes the city a shittier place. I couldn't care less that for a very small amount of people, it will be more convenient to go to BB than to Pearson. We shouldn't rip up every bit of green we see in the name of convenience.
 
I will not pretend to know the identities of the exact people who are profiting here, but expanding the airport generates more economic activity, and therefore someone is going to be financially benefiting from it. The fact that expropriating "large sections" of the Toronto Islands will be destructive to one of the nicest public realms in the entire city need not concern us, of course.
Have we seen a map of what part of the island they are expropriating?
 

Back
Top