News   Dec 05, 2025
Renowned Toronto-Born Architect Frank Gehry, Dead at 96
 635     2 
News   Dec 05, 2025
Finch West Line 6 Opens Sunday: It Could Use Some Improvements
 2.1K     4 
News   Dec 05, 2025
First Phase Advances at Multi-Tower Proposal on Steeles in Brampton
 457     0 

Premier Doug Ford's Ontario

JasonParis said:
If the bartender cuts you off, where is the confusion? Still, a provincial mandate is likely best.
Click to expand...
Bars with parking lots are confusing. Now that's a provincial mandate worth considering.

a7hg6q.jpg
 
Northern Light said:
Certainly there is a financial element to Ford's popularity for some; be it speed cameras, road tolls or removing the annual license plate fee.

But I will argue its more than that.

The license plate fee/renewal has been a sore point with many not just because of the money, but because it was a hassle. For most of its existence an annual trip to the local Service Ontario where one needed to remember one's insurance, and then get to the front of the interminable line before realizing you hadn't checked the odometer as required.... it was a 1/2 day off work, unpaid for many, or giving up a Saturday morning.

Was it some awful burden? Nah, but it was a hassle that most felt achieved little. Ford didn't just make the fee go away, your plate now renews every year, by itself, no stickers.

That's frankly good retail politics. It may not be the best for government coffers, but I would argue road tolls while unpopular made more sense in the era of automatic billing by cameras.
Regrettably, they did away w/that too. But again, that's not just money, that's "I can take the fastest route that works for me without thinking about the money"

This is the same logic as handing out 'personal' cell numbers to the general public..... Doug nixed that stunt after a short bit, but his his late brother Rob employed it to great effect. Did he really make the wheels of gov't go faster for most? Nah.
Did he address any systemic flaws be that under-funding or organization/prioritization in situations he addressed? Nope.

But a handful of times, he got someone's snow cleared, he got work orders for public housing tenants that had languished for months addressed within a week, and people remember those things and talk about them no end to others.

He's also frankly good at reading the public mood, when he goes off on a rant about Trump/The U.S. or how long it takes to get something done (even if he isn't fixing that), or puts booze in corner stores.... there are people going "Finally, some common sense" here, there and everywhere.

Many of his policy remedies are 1/2 baked, or ill timed, and the appearance of large scale grift is yet another profound concern.

But other politicians needs to pay attention just the same. Solve a problem, in clear, understandable language, where the benefit will be widely felt.

It doesn't have to be lowering taxes; but it does have to be lifting some irksome regulation of low value that annoys people; or simplifying something people hate ( there's a real winner to be had in a one-page tax return for someone, and better still, universal auto-filing, so no more tax returns.)

At the provincial level that could be lowering the drinking age to 18 (just like Quebec), and a 3AM last call (more booze, I know) but the virtue here is that no really thinks either of those would cause mass harm or have in Quebec, but a large constituency (teens), but also bar owners and club owners would love it; and it costs nothing.

Provincially, there are lots of policy ideas that are more substantive, but its finding a way to cut through the BS. Lets take healthcare. One thing people experience wait times for and in some cases geographic hassle is diagnostic imaging.

This is an important one simply because is comparatively easy and cheap to address. When you look at machines of these types CT, MRI and PET, Ontario has too few relative to peer jurisdictions on a per capita basis.

The one-time capital cost of buying another 100 CTs is ~100M, another 50MRIs ~75M, and another 50 PET Scanners ~200M, so all-in 375M, or 187.5M per year for two years. Its a rounding error in the provincial budget. You need more trained staff to run them, that takes about 2 years, training an additional 600 staff over 3-4 years is viable, and some incentives that delay retirement or cover some overtime can finish the job.

Your sustained cost for operating the additional machines and additional hours is maybe in the range 100M per year.

But thing is if you can clearly say 'Within 2 years no one will ever wait more than 2 weeks for a scan, ever' You'll be popular.

If every Toronto hospital had a PET Scanner, and you filled in some of those gaps in the province that involve multi-hour drives by adding them in NB, Timmins, the Sault, Sarnia, Ptbo, Belleville, Niagara and Owen Sound
boy will you be popular with a slew of patients, caregivers and medical professionals.

Clarity, and understandably communicating "This benefits YOU" is key.
Click to expand...
Many people tend to be single- issue voters. If something benefits me directly, then that's enough for me to support whomever brings the benefit forward. It's proven over and over again. It's also remarkable that our political superstructures are so based on such blinkered perspectives.
 
globalnews.ca

Ford government sets spending record for commercials ‘promoting’ governing party | Globalnews.ca

Auditor General Shelley Spence’s annual review of advertising found, in the fiscal year ending in March 2025, the province spent $111.9 million on advertising.
globalnews.ca globalnews.ca

The Progressive Conservatives spent more on public advertising in the run-up to February’s snap election than any other Ontario government in history, the auditor general has found, pushing commercials with a message that “promotes the governing party.”

Auditor General Shelley Spence’s annual review of advertising found, in the fiscal year ending in March 2025, the province spent $111.9 million on advertising — $8.4 million more than the year before, which had already set a record.

“This most recent fiscal year saw the highest ever spending on government advertising and included the election in February 2025,” Spence wrote in her report published Tuesday.

Ontario NDP Leader Marit Stiles said the government was using increasing amounts of public money to “polish” the premier’s image.

The largest campaigns run by the government over the past year were its U.S. partnership commercial ads, which ran across major American networks, and a continuation of the “It’s Happening Here” commercial domestically.

As Global News has previously reported, the budget for the American commercials — designed to charm U.S. President Donald Trump and convince him not to levy massive tariffs against Ontario — was $52 million.

The auditor general found the government ultimately spent $40.1 million of that budget, largely on TV commercials.

The other campaign, “It’s Happening Here,” was flagged last year by the auditor general as being run without a clear purpose beyond improving the public’s view of the government.

“The advertisements were aimed at a general audience,” Spence repeated in her report for 2025.

“They did not include information about services and programs, but rather appeared designed to improve Ontarians’ impression of the current state of Ontario, the subtext of which promotes the governing party.”
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top