News   Dec 20, 2024
 3K     9 
News   Dec 20, 2024
 1.1K     3 
News   Dec 20, 2024
 2K     0 

Post: Move the UN to Montreal? Mais non, merci!

wyliepoon

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
2,011
Reaction score
3
Link to article

Move the UN to Montreal? Mais non, merci!

Steven Edwards
National Post

Saturday, October 27, 2007

Promoting his province before a New York business audience recently, Jean Charest, the Quebec Premier, sprinkled his remarks with amusing quips.

Here's one that would have brought the house down: His government believes it can convince the United Nations to quit New York for Montreal.

Last year, Raymond Bachand, the province's economic development minister, allocated $100,000 for feasibility studies, while the federal, provincial and Montreal governments chipped in another $50,000 through promotion agency Montreal International.

The agency's line? Montreal would save the UN a ton of money and become a world capital in the process.

Alas, the disparate forces that run the UN have little interest in cost efficiencies -- that's for capitalists.

They're much more interested in other factors, such as the opportunities for spying on the United States, or getting to live in a multi-mil-lion-dollar Manhattan brownstone. The annual summit just wouldn't be the same without delegates having easy access to swanky Fifth Avenue shops.

"The thing is, moving to Montreal would mean the diplomats have to forgo all their social arrangements," says Ian Williams, author of The UN for Beginners.

The prime mover behind the relocation to Montreal is Jean O'Keefe, a Montreal transportation consultant whose other non-work passion is running the Web site The Worldwide Gourmet.

He says he and business colleagues noted New Yorkers were complaining more than ever about the UN last year after it lobbied U.S. taxpayers for more than $1-billion in interest-free loans to finance renovations to its headquarters building.

This was on top of perennial gripes about UN diplomats not paying their parking fines, or blocking the roads with their limousine cavalcades, or using diplomatic immunity as an excuse to hold back rent or property taxes.

If Gotham doesn't appreciate their international guests, O'Keefe and company thought, Montreal will.

As the UN's refit bill ballooned to $2.1-billion, the Quebec government sent a delegation to New York to show a move to Montreal would cost only $790-million. For a total of $2.2-billion, Montreal could accommodate not only the UN, but the 192 country missions and a host of linked activist organizations, the city's daily La Presse reported.

The Quebec group was received by Mark Malloch Brown, then UN deputy secretary general, whose known distaste for the Bush administration suggests he provided a sympathetic ear.

Backers of the move argued Montreal's bilingual character made it a perfect fit, given the world body's two "working" languages are English and French. But like so much at the UN, the linguistic profile is an anachronism. Only 32 of the 192 member states ask for correspondence in French only; 140 say they can handle English, while 20 prefer Spanish.

The Quebecers also point to Montreal's low crime rate compared with New York's. But notwithstanding what goes on in some New York neighbourhoods, there aren't many muggings in the back of a Lincoln Town Car, the preferred form of transport for many UN-ers. What's more, almost all the UN's New York buildings are in highly policed parts of Manhattan, itself the most elite borough.

Stalin reportedly agreed to place UN headquarters in the United States because he saw the potential for spying on the host country. While the United States has also been caught eavesdropping on others, the UN's current location provides ideal cover for placing spies inside the world's only remaining superpower.

Few believe that Cuba's massive UN delegation -- with 40 diplomats, it's almost double Canada's -- are all working solely on development issues.

Gotham's nightlife is also a big hit with many diplomats. Where else can you drop almost $130,000 in one night, as a Bangladeshi official did at the high-priced strip joint Scores?

Despite the griping of New Yorkers, Mayor Michael Bloomberg has made it clear the city wants to keep the UN; the world body and its more than 9,000 accredited diplomats and their families pump in more than $3-billion every year into the local economy.

Quebec's Bachand says last year's presentation was made in response to a "window of opportunity" that now seems to have closed.

While the sum spent on the project was not enormous, there were surely better uses for the money.
 
I clearly remember Toronto also making a go for the UN 4 years ago... What in God's name prompted Montreal to follow?
 
Based on the past history of these two cities, are you really surprised?

If Toronto's bid went ass-far, what made Montreal believe they could do better?

Regardless, if the diplomats need fancy clubs, restaurants and shops.. Toronto's got that (albeit not nearly in the same quantites as NYC)
Anyway, I prefer the headquarters in New York, that's a global city in my eyes.
 
Gotham's nightlife is also a big hit with many diplomats. Where else can you drop almost $130,000 in one night, as a Bangladeshi official did at the high-priced strip joint Scores?

I bet he could have dropped $130,000 (Canadian, so that's like, what, $135,000 American ;) ) at Chez Paris. :cool:
 
Will the UN ever move to Montreal?

Everyone: As much as some Americans are apprehensive of the UN I cannot see it abandoning NYC-because of the UN NYC is unoficially the world's capitol.
If the UN ever moves it would go back to Europe where it began. In short:NO. LI MIKE
 
^I agree Long Island Mike: if the UN would ever move (and that's a huge "if") it would go to Europe. But since American political sentiments towards the UN change with the Administration in power, there is no real need to move.

One just wishes that the UN would overcome is choking bureaucracy and excessive political leanings. It could/can be such a great organization if/when it gets its collective act together.

New York is a perfect location, A truly "world" city.
 
I clearly remember Toronto also making a go for the UN 4 years ago... What in God's name prompted Montreal to follow?
Montreal has been talking about this for a long time, it's not a new thing. Also, I don't think Toronto ever seriously considered trying to encourage the UN to move here. There was however some talk of T.O. trying to land a "UN University."
 
Toronto had the UPeace in the bag. They were going to move here, but the City just didn't move on it. When the new Harper government was elected, they sent a letter to UPeace telling them that we didn't want them, even though the agreement would have expired anyway in a couple months.
 
I'm not convinced that the UN would move to Europe. Perhaps Brussels, but given that Europe will only have a more and more monolithic foreign policy, I'm not sure it'd go over well. I could see it going to a small potato country like Canada, especially since Canada tends to be very much in tune with the UN politically, and more of a melage of European and American (and increasingly Asian) worldviews.
 
... I could see it going to a small potato country like Canada, especially since Canada tends to be very much in tune with the UN politically, and more of a melage of ... worldviews

Are you willing to expand on this thought? Perhaps I am reading too much into what you are stating.
 
Probably. Canada is similar to the US in many ways, but goes to an effort to differentiate itself from its bigger neighbour. We often undertake policies much more in tune with Europe at the least.

I'm probably not being very clear. Oh well.
 
By the same token, the U.S could be defined as having a different worldview than Europe. Considering the colonial history of many European countries, the legacy that many of these colonial efforts left behind, and the wars fought on the European continent (and beyond), the changed European take on global issues is still rather recent.

For some Europeans, there is an opinion that there is little difference between the United States and Canada; to them, both are immigrant cultures. Canada does not always rate highly in terms of thought, largely because little is known of the country, its history or the people.
 
That was kind of my point. A perceivedly neutral party.

While Europe will tend to see us as more American, America will tend to see us as more 'european' (socialist, left-leaning, etc.).
 

Back
Top