News   Feb 06, 2026
 20K     4 
News   Feb 06, 2026
 1K     0 
News   Feb 06, 2026
 2.4K     5 

Post: Mississauga Will Soon Surrender Debt-Free Status

AlvinofDiaspar

Moderator
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
34,640
Reaction score
32,809
Location
Toronto
From the Post:

Mississauga Will Soon Surrender Debt-Free Status
Ageing Infrastructure; City expects to spend reserve in less than five years
Natalie Alcoba, National Post
Published: Monday, September 17, 2007
Mississauga, which proudly boasts its debt-free status, expects to spend its half-billion-dollar reserve in as a little as five years and then go into the red for the first time in three decades.

According to figures released in its 2006 financial report, the city has more than $582-million in its reserves and reserve fund -- money it set aside to invest in things like civic buildings, roads and sewers. But as the infrastructure has aged, Mississauga has had to dip deeper into its savings, according to City Manager Janice Baker.

"We anticipate that by 2012 we actually will be borrowing to maintain our infrastructure," Ms. Baker told the National Post during a recent meeting. "We will have used up most, if not all of those reserve funds."

Mayor Hazel McCallion was unavailable yesterday to comment on the anticipated shortfall, but she has often touted her city's impressive financial record, which is the envy of other municipalities that struggle to meet their bottom line.

Toronto, for example, has been running the city on borrowed cash for years.

Toronto's debt was forecast at more than $2.6-billion this year and expected to grow to the $3.1-billion mark by 2011. This year, the city will spend 12.6% of its property tax revenues on debt servicing, a figure that is expected to jump to 15.4% by 2011.

The last time Mississauga borrowed money was in 1978, when Ms. McCallion took office. The city remains debt free, even though its reserves and reserve funds are dropping--from $645.8 million in 2002 to $582.2-million in 2006. The city's latest financial report notes that while those savings "remain high and very strong, capital pressures required draws from these funds to finance our growing infrastructure requirements."

Ms. Baker said Mississauga spends about $100-million a year on capital investment, most of it going to keeping roads in drive-able condition. Last year, the city also upgraded its transit fleet, surfaced 90 streets, and added to or replaced 21 playgrounds.

As Mississauga grew from a community of farms and pastures to a bustling, thriving suburban municipality, much of the infrastructure -- including the roads, the sewers, even the signalization -- was paid for by the developers who built the subdivisions and industrial areas.

The developers have since handed over that infrastructure to the city, Ms. Baker said. "Well, fast forward 20 or 30 years, those streets have been driven on for all that time," said Ms. Baker. "There are cracks in them, they need to be rebuilt. In some cases they need to be widened because growth has happened and they can't accommodate the level of traffic."

It is costing the city $18-million to construct the Confederation Parkway Bridge over Highway 403, the city manager said.

"When we need to resurface Hurontario [Street], you're talking mega-millions to do sections of that road."

Road maintenance is set to double in the next five years, Ms. Baker said.

nalcoba@nationalpost.com


© National Post 2007
 
And with that will come higher taxes. And then some city further out in suburbia will come around with lower taxes and businesses will start to leave. And Mississauga will settle into middle age looking like Etobicoke or North York. The cycle of life will continue.
 
Well it's already beginning to happen. Milton is on the west boundary of Mississauga, and has lower taxes (but inferior services too). Look at the big warehouses being built in Milton now.
 
...and this is why very soon after they are granted the power to do so cities like Missi will implement a land-transfer tax or something similar, after Toronto has paved the way.
 
Mississauga

Mississauga, Hydro and Peel have already begun to raise taxes annually, actually at a rate higher than Toronto.

I will be the first to say that having 10 years of no tax increases during the city's peak growth period was irresponsible. An automatic 1% increase annually should have been built in and the money put towards reserves.

That being said, the financial outlook of the city of Mississauga is far healthier and stronger than anything the old Metro cities experienced during their downturn in growth.

As for these new edge cities around Mississauga, they do not have the benefit of having development fees paying for growth. Hence, the lack of services and reserves.

Mississauga had and still has the right location and timining.

Louroz
 
Now that the land transfer tax managed by municipalities is becoming an ever so fashionable idea, we can soon look forward to the inevitable increase in the land transfer tax.
 
If demand falls in the real estate market, the land transfer tax won't be so fashionable. No one cares because then we can just come up with new taxes and tack them onto our current repertoire of taxes.
 
I highly doubt that Hazel and her Klan will be the first to implement a new tax, they are too conservative.
 
Wasn't it Conservatives who introduced income taxes in Canada? And import tariffs in the 20's and 30's? And the GST?

Conservative like their taxes. They just don't like other people's taxes. The same is true in the opposite direction, of course.
 
income taxes are from WW1 when Prime Minister Borden was in power, i believe and he was a conservative.
 

Back
Top