News   Apr 22, 2026
 610     2 
News   Apr 22, 2026
 845     0 
News   Apr 22, 2026
 491     1 

PM Mark Carney's Canada

There was no need for some dedicated snitch line. People can just call the cops if they suspect a crime. It was nothing but pandering to racists.
It was a dog whistle during an election campaign, and it backfired spectacularly.
 
Last edited:
I am quite certain he does know a good deal lol.
He seems to have done a fair bit wrong for someone who supposedly knows.
When Carney made his famous - Canadians don't use steel, so it's okay to pile carbon taxes on it - comment during the election campaign, I really started to wonder if he was an idiot or whether he thought his voters were idiots.
I have run into quite a few PhD's who are so specialized that they have no breadth of knowledge, and only have a very narrow focus. For Carney, it seems to be avoiding paying taxes for his companies and now as funneling taxpayers money to his companies.
At the time, I thought - Carney had the resume to get the job interview, but he failed the interview.
I actually think Carney could be an ok PM, but that is not why he was recruited for the job and not what was required of him.
 
He seems to have done a fair bit wrong for someone who supposedly knows.
When Carney made his famous - Canadians don't use steel, so it's okay to pile carbon taxes on it - comment during the election campaign, I really started to wonder if he was an idiot or whether he thought his voters were idiots.
I have run into quite a few PhD's who are so specialized that they have no breadth of knowledge, and only have a very narrow focus. For Carney, it seems to be avoiding paying taxes for his companies and now as funneling taxpayers money to his companies.
At the time, I thought - Carney had the resume to get the job interview, but he failed the interview.
I actually think Carney could be an ok PM, but that is not why he was recruited for the job and not what was required of him.
Fair... but politicians playing dumb to advance special interest groups... a tale as old as time.
 
He seems to have done a fair bit wrong for someone who supposedly knows.
When Carney made his famous - Canadians don't use steel, so it's okay to pile carbon taxes on it - comment during the election campaign, I really started to wonder if he was an idiot or whether he thought his voters were idiots.
I have run into quite a few PhD's who are so specialized that they have no breadth of knowledge, and only have a very narrow focus. For Carney, it seems to be avoiding paying taxes for his companies and now as funneling taxpayers money to his companies.
At the time, I thought - Carney had the resume to get the job interview, but he failed the interview.
I actually think Carney could be an ok PM, but that is not why he was recruited for the job and not what was required of him.
So you instead supported the part time call centre operator who took a decade to finish a BA from University of Calgary and said that cryptocurrencies were a good store of value.
 

Minister MacKinnon announces sovereign space launch capabilities through the Canadian Space Launch Act

Didn't we just cut the space program budget? Is this going to be more money flowing to a private company, or will the crown actually own this spaceport?
 
Is this advisory panel Mark Carney's way of admitting he knows nothing about economics.
or does it mean he plans on destroying our relationship with the USA and wants the panel as scapegoats.
The relationship is already destroyed. It's his way of making PP look even more unimportant than he is.
 
Not just Harper, Alberta and Ontario were pushing the federal government to bring in more people. Conservative governments love to suppress wages.
This is mostly false on many levels.

In the late 19th, early 20th century, suppressing wages tended to be a right-wing/conservative thing in some Western countries; this is established history. (Conversely, labour movements tended to be anti-immigration)

However, in the recent Canadian case, that's not very true.

Harper made it easier to get TFWs in 2006/7, but virtually all of immigration-driven growth under Harper came from PR admissions.

Under Trudeau it came from temporary (work) visas like IMP, student visas, student-work visas, which are federal programs, see post on previous page. Much more likely to be low wage and wage suppressive too. And if you don't believe me, here is the Bank of Canada saying so.

"Between 2015 and 2024, temporary workers have become younger, less experienced and more likely to migrate from lower-income countries. As well, the shares of temporary workers in skilled occupations have declined moderately. Throughout this period, the average nominal wage gap between temporary and Canadian-born workers has more than doubled, widening from -9.5%to -22.6%. [...]
Our results suggest that aggregate nominal wages would have been, on average, 0.7% higher in 2023–24 had the characteristics of temporary workers remained unchanged over the past decade."


Harper tightened the TFW system in 2013 and 2014 due to backlash from a April 2012 loosening that set 15% below prevailing wage for high skilled jobs and 5% below prevailing wage for low skilled jobs. In April 2013, they reinstated the prevailing wage requirement. This explicit wage suppression lasted for one year. In 2014, TFWs were heavily restricted under Harper, which lead to applications declining by 75%. A study showed that wages grew "3–6 percent for domestic workers in occupations heavily reliant on TFWs", as a result of the 2014 reforms.

TFWs and IMP-equivalents actually declined in the last few years of Harper's admin:
Year
TFWP​
IMP​
2013
118,446​
193,381​
2014
94,621​
194,160​
2015
73,040​
176,168​

Here is what happened in 2016, right after the Liberals were elected: "Canada dilutes plan to limit low-wage temporary foreign workers"
https://www.reuters.com/article/wor...wage-temporary-foreign-workers-idUSL1N19F22D/.

Here are the 2024 numbers to compare:

Year
TFWP​
IMP​
2024
191,630​
717,405​

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alberta and Ontario were pushing the federal government to bring in more people
Yes, but part of that was asking for more skilled PRs (economic immigrants), instead of say, family reunification PRs.

In 2007, Alberta said they want 10% of PRs, and that more PR nominations would help skilled labour shortages. The Provincial Nominee Program.
https://www.alberta.ca/release.cfm?xID=214387C8478C8-D2AA-EF6B-F7F8A6089B60D50E&utm

In 2011, Alberta realized TFWs weren't the optimal solution, PRs were better. https://open.alberta.ca/dataset/30c...11-impact-of-the-temporary-foreign-worker.pdf

In 2014 and 2017, the Ontario Liberals similarly pushed for more skilled PRs, since their proportion of PRs had declined.
https://news.ontario.ca/en/release/28364/strengthening-immigration-in-ontario

1776852401382.png

https://www.ontario.ca/page/new-direction-ontarios-immigration-strategy
----------------------------------

Permanent admissions during Harper went from 250,000 in 2006 to 272,000 in 2015.

More to the point, if Harper loosening TFW rules spiked migration like you two are implying, why was net migration was flat from 2000 through 2015?

Net migration went up 60% in the first year of Trudeau on a year-to-year basis. We can compare to Chretien/Martin before Harper as well:

1776850013261.png

Year
PR admissions (Immigrants)​
Net migration​
1993
256,754​
142,805​
1994
224,395​
152,213​
1995
212,875​
161,792​
1996
226,061​
166,553​
1997
216,034​
154,022​
1998
174,184​
117,263​
1999
189,971​
158,015​
2000
227,429​
198,753​
2001
250,638​
238,533​
2002
229,049​
212,500​
2003
221,349​
194,416​
2004
235,859​
194,999​
2005
262,246​
212,969​
2006
251,649​
216,500​
2007
236,763​
229,266​
2008
247,262​
266,253​
2009
252,218​
267,064​
2010
280,739​
250,479​
2011
248,735​
240,605​
2012
257,825​
253,606​
2013
259,046​
260,580​
2014
260,308​
222,322​
2015
271,867​
205,971
2016
296,385​
328,335
2017
286,537​
380,739​
2018
321,054​
438,056​
2019
341,174​
495,164​
2020
184,594​
69,293​
2021
406,046​
444,372​
2022
437,612​
917,753​
2023
471,817​
1,196,843​
2024
483,654​
815,808​
2025
393,752​
-133,642​

StatsCan Source
---------------------------------------------

I wonder why the CBC didn't cover LMIA-less IMP visas under Trudeau?

2013: "Temporary foreign workers hired in areas with EI claimants" was a big knock against the Conservatives

Hiring temporary workers on visas (IMP, student visas, student-work visas, and TFWs) has been commonplace despite EI claimants for a decade, it's just accepted practice now.
 

Attachments

  • 1776832351579.png
    1776832351579.png
    111.7 KB · Views: 0
  • 1776832379276.png
    1776832379276.png
    111.7 KB · Views: 15
Last edited:
Shouldn’t it be time to reform the criminal record checks? I’ve seen many people that would say that criminal records are barriers to those after leaving prison. And why wouldn’t Canada take a page from Norway or Sweden then?
^1 out of 9?? Seems awfully high. Obviously not everyone with a criminal record is a violent murderer, but still.
 
I think most people would agree that convicted criminals should not be given lighter sentences simply due to the risk of deportation after, if their sentence reaches a certain threshold.
Deportation should be part of the sentencing, not a consequence of it. “Anyone PR, visa holder or visitor convicted of a criminal act shall face transportation to their country of origin.” or words to such. Of course we can’t send refugees back to active war zones, so some different plan is needed there.
 
Religious fundamentalist theocracies?
One time a friend of mine was visiting Saudi Arabia. I was working with a Muslim from Pakistan here in Toronto at the time and they were excited to hear about my friend's experience. When they visited Mecca my coworker asked if they were Muslim and my response was "no, they're X nationality". My coworker kind of cocked his head a bit and said "Anyone can be Muslim no matter who or what they are." I think about that interaction quite a bit.

Anyway, this "honor killing" nonsense is western liberal fearmongering from a decade ago to demonize Muslims. Lots of fundamentalists kill lots of people regardless of religion - you're just attaching yourself to this Harper-era dogwhistling to point at a religion you don't like, attaching it to cultures you associate with being Muslim. Pass.

I'd also like to note that the page you've linked quotes that honor killing "goes across cultures and religions" so, again: which culture are you referring to that encourages the killing of women? Please elaborate for us.
 

Back
Top