PM Mark Carney's Canada

[thettctransitfanatic]

Minister MacKinnon announces sovereign space launch capabilities through the Canadian Space Launch Act

Canada reached the moon but still lacks its own way to space. Canada is the only country in the G7 that does not have space launch capabilities and must rely on foreign countries, most often the United States, to reach orbit. In a more uncertain and competitive world, Canada cannot rely on...

www.canada.ca

Minister MacKinnon announces sovereign space launch capabilities through the Canadian Space Launch Act​

Canada reached the moon but still lacks its own way to space. Canada is the only country in the G7 that does not have space launch capabilities and must rely on foreign countries, most often the United States, to reach orbit. In a more uncertain and competitive world, Canada cannot rely on others to secure access to space for our economy, our defence, and our future.

Today, the Minister of Transport and the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, the Honourable Steven MacKinnon, introduced the Canadian Space Launch Act to deliver Canadian sovereign space launch capabilities. The Act would enable the government to safely regulate and oversee space launch and re-entry activities conducted from Canadian territory, while also establishing the necessary authorities to provide regulatory certainty to industry, support investment and infrastructure development, and strengthen Canada’s ability to meet its international obligations related to space.

Establishing Canadian sovereign space launch capabilities would drive billions in investments, create good paying jobs, increase Canada’s sovereignty, reduce our economy’s reliance on the United States, and support a commercial space launch and re-entry industry that could be worth $40 billion.

The Canadian Space Launch Act’s regulatory framework is key to securing our place in the rapidly growing global space economy while building on Canada’s historic contributions to humanity’s space innovations. This positions Canada to meet strategic needs, enhance resilience of critical infrastructure and other systems that rely on space assets, while fueling domestic innovation and industry growth and positioning Canada for renewed economic and security partnerships with allies.

Canada must be ambitious to have better control over its launches and stronger measures to reduce costly delays that leave critical infrastructure exposed to decisions beyond our control. As Canada develops greater launch and re-entry capabilities, these provide new opportunities for partnerships, collaboration and capacity building in Canada and with other nations around the world.


Quotes

“Canada has a long and important history in space, and we are taking another major step toward securing our future in the rapidly evolving space domain. A long-term Canadian commercial space launch and re-entry regulatory framework would help make our space sector more competitive, create lasting economic opportunity for the Canadian space sector, encourage innovation and research, and support national security.”

The Honourable Steven MacKinnon
Minister of Transport and Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

“At a moment of rising global uncertainty, Canada must reinforce its economic security and safeguard its sovereignty by investing in our capabilities. By advancing space launch activities here at home and implementing our new Defence Industrial Strategy, the government is opening the door to emerging opportunities for Canadian innovators and businesses, creating high quality jobs that strengthen our economy, and enhancing Canada’s security. With global demand for space launch services at record levels, Canada is stepping up to meet this demand and ensuring Canadians benefit and lead the growth of this strategic sector.”
The Honourable Mélanie Joly
Minister of Industry and Minister responsible for Canada Economic Development for Quebec Regions

“Our government is opening Canadian airspace under clear and controlled conditions so companies can safely launch and return spacecraft from Canada. That clarity gives industry the confidence to invest, build infrastructure, and create good-paying jobs here at home. In Nova Scotia, our $200 million investment in a spaceport will help ensure Canadian technology can be launched from Canadian soil, strengthening our sovereignty and supporting national security while positioning Atlantic Canada as a growing hub for innovation and global partnerships.”
The Honourable Sean Fraser
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada and Minister responsible for the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency

Quick facts​

• 
  In 2022, revenues of the space sector were estimated at $5.0B, with exports reaching $2.0B, and contributed approximately $3.2B to Canada’s gross domestic product.
  
• 
  In 2023, Canada’s space workforce grew by 5.9%, creating a record of 13,888 space-related jobs from coast to coast to coast.
  
• 
  Based on estimates from Deloitte, the domestic space market is projected to reach $40 billion by 2040, and the global space economy is estimated to reach $1.5 trillion by 2032.
  
• 
  On March 16, 2026, the Honourable David J. McGuinty, Minister of National Defence, announced an historic $200 million investment in core infrastructure for a Canadian-owned spaceport, along with other major new space-related capabilities and initiatives, marking a significant step forward in Canada’s sovereign space program as outlined in Security, Sovereignty, Prosperity: Canada’s Defence Industrial Strategy.
  
• 
  The development of a comprehensive launch and re-entry regulatory framework aligns with the Government of Canada’s priorities related to economic growth, national defence and sovereignty –directly supporting Canada’s Defence Industrial Strategy and National Security Strategy.

 

[zang]

Anyone could do it regardless of culture, but some cultures condemn it, while others encourage it.

Please, do tell. What cultures "encourage" it, and what cultures condemn it?

 

[Mihairokov]

Anyone could do it regardless of culture, but some cultures condemn it, while others encourage it.

Which culture encourages the killing of women?

 

[Admiral Beez]

former Federal Conservative leaders Erin O’Toole and Jean Charest, and former Conservative cabinet minister Lisa Raitt

This doesn't give Poilievre much room to complain about Liberal strategy.

Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre had a lukewarm reaction

I bet.

 

[Admiral Beez]

The principle of equality before the law - as individuals, is a longstanding principle of our legal system. The principle either exists, or doesn't.

Many would argue that it doesn't. As white guy, it works for me just fine. I think we need to ask our BIPOC members if they think it does for them.

 

[urbanclient]

Complete tosh.

The principle of equality before the law - as individuals, is a longstanding principle of our legal system (and its English predecessor, I think since Magna Carta). The principle either exists, or doesn't.

Yet another Trudeau 'great idea' that deserves the boot. Add it to the list.

(Say, isn't Chris Rock a foreigner?)

@Admiral Beez is right, just by the time Trudeau rolled it out, it was probably less than necessary or effective, had something similar been implemented in the 1980s.

Gladue/pseudo-Gladue I would put as one or two categories. Criminal Code amendment 1995, R. v. Gladue from 1999 and pseudo-Gladue 2019, 2021, 2022

Immigration status is another category. R. v. Pham from 2013.

White citizens is the third or fourth.

Does not look good for equality under the law.

I think most people would agree that convicted criminals should not be given lighter sentences simply due to the risk of deportation after, if their sentence reaches a certain threshold. It actually goes against the core tenets of sentencing principles espoused under Gladue. In practice, it also means offenders escape the deportation consequences that the government intended to follow from serious criminality.

Which culture encourages the killing of women?

The whole world isn't the relatively progressive, developed bubble that we are fortunate to live in. You're also strawmanning the argument and turning it into the indefensible extreme of a "culture that encourages killing women".

"Most cases of honor killings involve femicide, and they are likewise a frequent manifestation of violence against women in regions of the world where there are traditional or legal norms that greatly restrict women's rights and freedoms."

Honor killing - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

I would also recommend reading about the differences between honour, face, and dignity cultures.

 

[81-717]

Please, do tell. What cultures "encourage" it, and what cultures condemn it?

Which culture encourages the killing of women?

Religious fundamentalist theocracies?

Honor killing - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

You dug up a quote of mine from last October to quote six months later?

***

For context here, because I think that quote reads badly, I was clarifying to another poster that it was reasonable to critique how many people you allow into a country all at once, when the infrastructure and housing for them aren't in place, and the job market can't support it, without that being a critique of people who want to come to Canada, in that case, and having nothing to do w/their particular demographic.

My comment had nothing do with the exchange above and is not properly contextualized.

I realize the context was different, but the quote itself is a pretty accurate description of what's going on in the EU, so not much digging but rather a quick search (can't believe it's been 6 months, I was positive it was from only a couple weeks ago; time flies, yet the 2030s still can't come soon enough).

 

[zang]

Religious fundamentalist theocracies?

Honor killing - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Like? Name a country. Name a religion.

 

[urbanclient]

Like? Name a country. Name a religion.

You very obviously did not bother to open that link and read the article. History shows, you're not willing to challenge your system of beliefs.
------------------------------------------------------

Change of topic, the decline of federal conservatives would be inevitable if the Liberals enacted electoral reform.

The last time the main fed conservative party(s) won more than 50% of the popular vote was 1984, 42 years ago. Since then, not only have the conservatives not broken 50%, they have always held a lower share of the vote than the Liberal + NDP.

The fed conservatives have averaged 36.5% of the popular vote compared to 50.18% for the Liberal and NDP combined in every election since 1988.

If the Liberals actually cared to prevent the conservatives from every holding power again, they would've changed the electoral system. The conservatives would never win a majority again, much of that due to demographic changes, with younger generations being less conservative.

I would be pressing Carney to follow through on Trudeau's promise.

 

[gabe]

It's not social conservatism driving young adults to be oddly more conservative at the polls than older generations. It's because the previous Liberals dropped the ball on the economy, especially for the working class. Harper arguably didn't improve things either, e.g. the housing file, but he didn't add fuel to the fire as net migration was stable ~200k throughout his term. Net migration skyrocketed to 330k in 2016 from 200k in 2015, immediately after Trudeau took power.

Agreed. So many young Gen Z's are angry they can't find jobs. Youth unemployment is far too high.. Thanks to Trudeau Liberals mass immigration and programs like LIMA, which allows business to replace locals with cheap exploitable foreign labor. Its just a really awful piece of legislation. The Liberal government could put an end to it tomorrow with a stroke of a pen. Which they don't tells you everything you need to know how government thinks of low wage job seekers, and those at the low end of the job market in general.

 

[CMQSD402F9011]

Agreed. So many young Gen Z's are angry they can't find jobs. Youth unemployment is far too high.. Thanks to Trudeau Liberals mass immigration and programs like LIMA, which allows business to replace locals with cheap exploitable foreign labor. Its just a really awful piece of legislation. The Liberal government could put an end to it tomorrow with a stroke of a pen. Which they don't tells you everything you need to know how government thinks of low wage job seekers, and those at the low end of the job market in general.

Didn’t Harper expanded the use of the TFW program? Or you want Gen Z’s to be paid with low wages like in the U.S.?

 

[Admiral Beez]

Didn’t Harper expanded the use of the TFW program? Or you want Gen Z’s to be paid with low wages like in the U.S.?

14 millions illegals working desperation jobs both drives down wages and income-driving innovation in the U.S. I work in the food business and when you visit a pork plant in high-wage Denmark, for instance you see automation that you'd never see at at a pork plant in the US or Canada. The way to avoid the low wage jobs for Canada's young adults is to reduce the number of people that need them while reducing these jobs very existence by driving innovation. But employers have no incentive to automate and innovate and to pay the higher wages those fewer jobs would entail, since they can get thousands of desperate low and semi skilled folks to work for peanuts.

 

[urbanclient]

Didn’t Harper expanded the use of the TFW program? Or you want Gen Z’s to be paid with low wages like in the U.S.?

All this person does is spout specious arguments, omitting key details, or outright misinformation. Harper and all conservatives are evil. And Trudeau could do no wrong.

Here is Trudeau criticizing the TFW program in 2014, only to turn around and dramatically expand the TFW program along with the other temporary visa pathways. TFW is tip of the iceberg. But hey, wage suppression of the working class is the exclusive domain of the evil Cons right?

Here is a labour union criticizing the TFW-adjacent Trans-Pacific Partnership visa program in 2016 during Trudeau's admin (under IMP).

Trans-Pacific Partnership is ‘the TFWP on steroids’ - AFL

Calgary – The Trans-Pacific Partnership allows corporations to bring in unlimited exploitable foreign workers and fundamentally transforms the Canadian labour market for the worse…

afl.org

When people often talk about TFW, they're actually referring to all visa pathways, especially the International Mobility Program (IMP), which allows employers to hire foreign workers without a Labour Market Impact Assessment (LMIA) "to demonstrate that hiring a foreign worker will not negatively affect Canadian workers".

"[T]he IMP has expanded rapidly over the years, driven by growing numbers of international student graduates, refugee claimants, and employers seeking LMIA-exempt options for hiring workers."

https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/canada-immigration-policy-inflection-point

--------------------------------------------


@CMQSD402F9011 do you buy the business lobby narrative that Canadians don't want to do these low paying jobs? So we need to farm them out to 'contemporary slaves' from places like Honduras?


--------------------------------------------
"The [United Nations] Special Rapporteur retains the view that the Temporary Foreign Worker Program serves as a breeding ground for contemporary forms of slavery, as it institutionalizes asymmetries of power that favour employers and prevent workers from exercising their rights."
2024: https://docs.un.org/en/A/HRC/57/46/Add.1

2014, before getting elected, Trudeau criticizes TFW, only to do the exact opposite of his own suggestions:

Justin Trudeau: How to fix the broken temporary foreign worker program

The Liberal leader says the program must be scaled back and refocused on its original purpose: to fill jobs on a limited basis when no Canadian workers can be found.

web.archive.org

Net migration was stable under Harper:

I'll leave this here as well, "Bernie Sanders: 'Open borders? That's a Koch brothers proposal' ":

Koch family - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

------------------------------------------------------------------

Or you want Gen Z’s to be paid with low wages like in the U.S.?

American Gen Z is paid higher real wages than Canadians Gen Z.

Last post before I hit ignore on this person's persistent ragebait.

 

[T3G]

Or you want Gen Z’s to be paid with low wages like in the U.S.?

They already are, and it makes no difference what political stripes anyone wears. Don't look for it to get any better, either.

 

[Westey]

"The committee will serve as a forum for expertise and strategy on all aspects of the Canada-U.S. economic relationship" Hmm. Expert and economics? Guess that leaves out Pierre Poilievre, but could include Mark Carney who knows a lot about economics.

Is this advisory panel Mark Carney's way of admitting he knows nothing about economics.
or does it mean he plans on destroying our relationship with the USA and wants the panel as scapegoats.