News   Apr 17, 2026
 796     0 
News   Apr 17, 2026
 1.8K     6 
News   Apr 17, 2026
 752     0 

PM Mark Carney's Canada

Looking at poll numbers, the approval ratings for PP went down after Trudeau announced his resignation back in January of 2025.
And said resignation *and* Trump's inauguration went nicely hand-in-hand to that end

(Still, all things in hindsight, the parallels btw/Studio 54 Maggie T and Coachella Justin are pretty vivid)
 
This. Homeless tripled in my hometown of Hamilton since pre-covid.
You're almost there. Now what happened to the global economy between pre and post covid?

The underlying economic numbers weren't good, even in 2019; obviously they took a nose dive after covid.
Oh, so you do know what happend.
 
Ah, another of those degenerated-into-bickering discussions. However, remember that re the PP alternative being framed as "dystopian": in the context of the election, it was really less about him than about the reflected glory of Trump, and PP being fatally framed as more of a likely mirror/lapdog/patsy for Trump's 51st-state rhetoric. Indeed, if it weren't for Trump awakening those misgivings, Canadians were perfectly prepared to give PP a firm mandate, even if it required holding one's nose while doing so.

Likewise, I agree to an extent about "life going on" under Harper. But where *he* choked up was when he and his boys in short pants got a little too cocky and started entertaining Arc-de-Drumpfian schemes like the Mother Canada statue, next to which Justin's "sunny ways" looked like a breath of fresh air...
I agree. Optics matter. Evidently, the plight of the masses doesn't, when your house is paid off and you live in a nice neighbourhood. It's not social conservatism driving young adults to be oddly more conservative at the polls than older generations. It's because the previous Liberals dropped the ball on the economy, especially for the working class. Harper arguably didn't improve things either, e.g. the housing file, but he didn't add fuel to the fire as net migration was stable ~200k throughout his term. Net migration skyrocketed to 330k in 2016 from 200k in 2015, immediately after Trudeau took power.

The underlying economic numbers weren't good, even in 2019
You're almost there. Now what happened to the global economy between pre and post covid?

Oh, so you do know what happend.

You're missing the point, the numbers weren't good before covid. Even if I play along and agree that everything after 2019 is rightfully scapegoated to covid.

From late 2021:
In their exasperation about stagnating living standards, Canadians have a point

"Prior the pandemic, the federal government, its agencies and even some in the media repeatedly claimed that Canada’s economy was “solid”. Clearly, this was not the case. As one of the most indebted countries in the world – with the combined debt of households, corporations and governments now standing at over 3½ times nominal GDP – one might have expected to see Canada’s economy rocketing along over the past decade and yielding gains in real incomes. Borrowing should have resulted in meaningful investments and gains in the country’s productive capacity. It did not."

OECD predicts Canada will be the worst performing advanced economy over the next decade…and the three decades after that

This prediction was predicated mostly on data from before covid. Full report and excerpt from abstract:

"Without policy changes, maintaining current public service standards and benefits while keeping public debt ratios stable at current levels would increase fiscal pressure in the median OECD country by nearly 8 percentage points of GDP between 2021 and 2060, and much more in some countries. Policy scenarios show that reforms to labour market and retirement policies could help boost living standards and alleviate future fiscal pressures." This is related to the OW situation @CMQSD402F9011

October 2021: https://www.oecd.org/en/publication...e-need-for-structural-reform_a112307e-en.html
 
More like a world-class immigration system (not "open borders free for all") and none of the catch & release revolving-door justice system bs.
Did you forget about the cultural values snitch line at the end? Harper gutted science and research funding, and was poor on many files. Oh, and he heads the Org that supports right wing governments around the world.

Harper was trash; don't try to lionize him
 
Did you forget about the cultural values snitch line at the end?
That was partly due to a high profile honour killing and other gender-related crimes. Paradox of tolerance... I don't see it as being poorly intentioned, even if unnecessary. The status quo is to contact police through regular channels.

don't try to lionize [Harper].
He's only lionized by the dumpster fire that came after.
 
I agree. Optics matter. Evidently, the plight of the masses doesn't, when your house is paid off and you live in a nice neighbourhood. It's not social conservatism driving young adults to be oddly more conservative at the polls than older generations. It's because the previous Liberals dropped the ball on the economy, especially for the working class. Harper arguably didn't improve things either, e.g. the housing file, but he didn't add fuel to the fire as net migration was stable ~200k throughout his term. Net migration skyrocketed to 330k in 2016 from 200k in 2015, immediately after Trudeau took power.




You're missing the point, the numbers weren't good before covid. Even if I play along and agree that everything after 2019 is rightfully scapegoated to covid.

From late 2021:
In their exasperation about stagnating living standards, Canadians have a point

"Prior the pandemic, the federal government, its agencies and even some in the media repeatedly claimed that Canada’s economy was “solid”. Clearly, this was not the case. As one of the most indebted countries in the world – with the combined debt of households, corporations and governments now standing at over 3½ times nominal GDP – one might have expected to see Canada’s economy rocketing along over the past decade and yielding gains in real incomes. Borrowing should have resulted in meaningful investments and gains in the country’s productive capacity. It did not."

OECD predicts Canada will be the worst performing advanced economy over the next decade…and the three decades after that

This prediction was predicated mostly on data from before covid. Full report and excerpt from abstract:

"Without policy changes, maintaining current public service standards and benefits while keeping public debt ratios stable at current levels would increase fiscal pressure in the median OECD country by nearly 8 percentage points of GDP between 2021 and 2060, and much more in some countries. Policy scenarios show that reforms to labour market and retirement policies could help boost living standards and alleviate future fiscal pressures." This is related to the OW situation @CMQSD402F9011

October 2021: https://www.oecd.org/en/publication...e-need-for-structural-reform_a112307e-en.html
Back in late 2014 when Harper was still the PM. The price of Oil crashed around the same time and has never recovered.

South of the border, how many young adults have gone to the Republican Party and voted Trump? Tons I guess and now they’re regretting ever since. Same people who voted for Doug Ford and now he’s been a disaster since 2018 when he announced massive cuts and has no intention on making things affordable.
 
he announced massive cuts and has no intention on making things affordable.
This is the 3rd or 4th time you've changed the topic with whataboutisms. I get your stance, but can I see the evidence that backs up the point? Or the steps to how you got to your conclusion?

I ostensibly agree with what you're saying, massive cuts, and no intention. However, I suspect that the mechanisms that you favour to reach affordability would not actually make things affordable. More to the point, what is the fiscally sustainable alternative? A question to think about when one ponders why people seem to vote against healthcare and education. For the record, I am very pro-public healthcare, education and transit.

In the Ford thread I spoke of Ontario falling behind other provinces on housing construction: https://www.rbc.com/en/economics/ca...da-isnt-in-a-housing-starts-slump-ontario-is/

Back in late 2014 when Harper was still the PM. The price of Oil crashed around the same time and has never recovered.
This is a specious and absolutist argument:

https://economicdashboard.alberta.ca/dashboard/wcs-oil-price/

Never recovered? Also, last time I checked, oil & gas was less than 10% of Canadian GDP, using the most generous methodology. You and I both know that prices don't need to be near all-time highs for the industry to rake in healthy profts.

In essence, are you saying that the Trudeau admin's policies were all well intentioned and would've improved Canada, they were simply undone by oil price fluctuations and covid? By that exaggerated logic, OPEC+ and other oil exporters must've been wiped out after 2014-2016. Certainly in ruins after covid.

The OECD compared Canada to other developed countries. We were underperforming compared to peer countries, including Norway, where oil & gas is 20 to 25% of their GDP.
 
Last edited:
social damage Harper did as PM
The greatest social damage is to prevent people from accumulating any wealth, as wide swaths of the population are priced out of home ownership. The lower rungs of Maslow's hierarchy are being forgotten here.

I exaggerate: You'd care less about a theocrat pushing religion into policy, when you can't put food on your table because housing costs are so high.

Housing stock-to-population ratio actually increased under Harper, only to decrease under Trudeau almost immediately.

1776640525399.png


continued to do after losing.
Mostly agree on the second point.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top