@tripwire thanks for the compliment, "beavers with frickin' laser beams attached to their heads..." is memorable
This discussion is both depressing and amusing. Depressing because it reminds me how shallow most Canadians are. Amusing, because it reminds me how shallow most Canadians are. We are the original infantile nation, forever bitching about England or the Americans. In many respects a perfectly balanced people, chips on both our shoulders.
And, we could go down the ‘so, apart from making us a high income, technologically advanced democracy, what did Britain ever do for us?’ discussion, but it has already been done much better by Monty Python. Also going down the 'colonialism was bad' discussion is fine, until we reach the point where we ask: as opposed to what?
As for a flag representing us, we have one, it’s the Maple Leaf flag. It represents all Canadians irrespective of religion, race or creed. It encapsulates who we are, and who we shall be. But, provincial flags tell the diverse story of where we came from and I think we should embrace them as symbols of all our heritage. The Union Jack as much a legitimate symbol of Canadian nationhood as the French imperial fleurs de lys or the inuksuk. Or indeed the maple leaf. They can be claimed by anyone, of any heritage.
I am no fan of cultural homogenisation. The ‘no name brand’ hollowing out of our history serves no one apart from those who have a chip on their shoulders (and maybe those with a radical political agenda, not naming 3-letter organisations). Is our commitment to diversity so shallow we need strip our national and provincial symbols of all meaning, in the name of a false sense of inclusion?
When I think of the Ontario flag, I picture it in my mind’s eye flying above the Rainbow Bridge crossing at Niagara Falls. It explains in simple, symbolic terms why we have a border and why we have a Canada.