Entirely on point.
I would further add; while I completely commend people to follow advice on social distancing; and the shut down of high-risk activities/workplaces, I also feel the extent of the current action is not sustainable in the medium term.
I'm not speaking economically.
I'm suggesting people simply won't abide this level of isolation/inconvenience indefinitely, and that's reflected by rapid loosening of restrictions in China.
Which makes it that much more important not to do this too soon, too long or too widely, because you want to get maximum compliance while you are doing it and where and when the need to do so is pressing.
We need to rapidly roll out more testing, particularly for healthcare workers, psws, and those with frequent contact w/the elderly or high-risk people, including family.
We likewise need to target those with positive tests, and those who are most vulnerable for isolation, so as to invest social (and financial) capital wisely.
This is not an either/or scenario of doing nothing or something half-measure vs totalitarian lockdown.
Its a matter of targeting restrictions and ppe and testing where they are most needed; and implementing the most useful and sustainable measures; while making our healthcare system sufficiently robust to handle what is, and what may follow.