Waiting patiently for journalists to figure out that the 55 billion that is part of the federal package is mostly a tax deferral. That's not actual money. As a small business owner it's totally useless and irrelevant. And if I had staff, how could I possibly care about help representing only 10% of my payroll? This is just as useless as I expected it would be.
I'm not sure I'd call the tax deferral useless.
I do agree the way its packaged as if it were a cash-transfer is misleading.
I would also happily agree that its insufficient, by a substantial margin, taken in isolation.
***
I must admit I'm puzzled by the 10% wage subsidy.
For one thing, I'm not clear if this will be available to businesses that are not restricted and not laying people off, such as supermarkets..............
For another, it seems entirely inadequate for any business whose revenue has dropped to zero or near zero.
I think, for the short-term, the right programs for employees are in place, but 55 cents on the dollar, that's in EI and its equivalents is too low for many people to manage their bills.
Putting the money from the wage subsidy back into those programs, driving up the income replacement rate to something between 60% and 75% income replacement would likely have been a better investment.
Business supports would be better directed at regulatory measures prohibiting loan calls and commercial evictions, at least for a month or two; as well as reimbursing businesses that are closed for fixed costs at 50c on the dollar and/or paying lease/mortgage payments in some form for a month or two.
Subject to some conditions around executive compensation, and a requirement to use up cash holdings within the business in excess of 'x' dollars before getting assistance.