News   Nov 12, 2024
 912     1 
News   Nov 12, 2024
 588     1 
News   Nov 12, 2024
 707     0 

Next Mayor of Toronto?

Imo the Police may get to much money but they are doing their job and doing a decent job. There are more police officers and a larger police presence in the streets. To some of you, this scares you, but IMO it keeps troublemakers on edge which is good.


Sure there is fat, but its not failing or becoming useless.


In the meantime, let's pretend it's Miller's fault.

It is his fault, he see's a budget shortfall and yet spends like an fool. You can blame the past but he has been in charge for 7 years now!
 
I just don't understand why Miller didn't push for a wage freeze for councillors. Why give them a raise if the city's finances are in rough shape? A wage freeze would have given him and council a much better position from which to engage the unions during the strike.
 
Imo the Police may get to much money but they are doing their job and doing a decent job. There are more police officers and a larger police presence in the streets. To some of you, this scares you, but IMO it keeps troublemakers on edge which is good.

Sure there is fat, but its not failing or becoming useless.

It is his fault, he see's a budget shortfall and yet spends like an fool. You can blame the past but he has been in charge for 7 years now!

On what are you basing the assertion that the police are doing a decent job of doing their job? I could cite a litany of complaints about police inefficiency and corruption, but I concede that such detractions wouldn't necessarily prove the police aren't doing a decent job.

I would rather hear a cogent, affirmative case, not just a bare assetion that they're "doing a decent job" (we already have The Toronto Sun to restate that bare assertion 7 days a week). Seriously, by what measure can it be said that the Toronto Police are effective and efficient?

This isn't a piss-take. I would really like to know.

I am a great believer in the notion that people ought to honour and respect police as the ultimate defenders of society's rules. But members of the Toronto Police have -- time and again -- done much to convince us that they are lazy, corrupt bureaucrats. I would very much like for that not to happen.
 
Its simple...

we are a city full of poor immigrants and poor youths who feel abandoned from society.


Yet the city has very low crime rates....

Sure this is mostly due to our social programs and all that, but the police play a huge part.

Yes the Police has corruption and waste, but its wrong to say they do not do their job.
 
Its simple...

we are a city full of poor immigrants and poor youths who feel abandoned from society.


Yet the city has very low crime rates....

Sure this is mostly due to our social programs and all that, but the police play a huge part.

Yes the Police has corruption and waste, but its wrong to say they do not do their job.

You originally said the police "are doing their job and doing a decent job". I don't think anyone ever said "the police aren't doing their job", as you accused in your most-recent post.

I asked you to state the basis of your opinion that the Toronto Police are doing "a decent job". You say the evidence is in Toronto's "very low crime rates" for "a city full of poor immigrants and poor youths who feel abandoned from society", and police play a huge part.

IMHO, even if your assertions are true (which I think is debatable) that's an insufficient argument. I'm no criminologist, so I don't know whether the levels of corruption and inefficiency in the Toronto Police are such that one could say they're "not doing a decent job of doing their job". But in terms of proving the contrary (i.e. that they ARE doing a decent job, etc.), I'm still waiting.

Maybe it would help if I provided one example of how it seems the Toronto Police aren't doing a decent job: the police union just elected as its leader a well-connected perjurer. Two leaders before him, they elected a guy who beat the crap out of a drunk in a park and then conspired with countless other cops to cover up their crime. The current leader -- the perjurer -- is the son of a former chief and the brother of a guy who is implicated in a huge extortion/bribery scandal, the paperwork for which seems to get periodically lost to the point that charges get dropped. Veteran investigators have been punished for blowing the whistle on the way this investigation has been handled.

And that's just the rot at the top of the system.

I dunno, though. It has been several years since the entire downtown vice squad had to be disbanded for conducting themselves as a criminal gang. The fact that they are being abetted by the crown and judiciary shouldn't necessarily reflect poorly on today's Toronto Police Services. Chief Blair certainly seems to be making positive changes. It is beyond debate that the demographic make-up of the police is changing to reflect the population of the city. These are the types of arguments that would seem to support the notion that the Toronto police are doing a good job.

But I don't see how the police are a deterrent to the criminal potentiality of dissaffected youth. Even the police will tell you that the answer to youth criminality is enhanced opportunity, not the threat of incarceration.
 
IMHO, even if your assertions are true (which I think is debatable) that's an insufficient argument. But in terms of proving the contrary (i.e. that they ARE doing a decent job, etc.), I'm still waiting.
Honestly, from what I've read above, I don't think any info he provides that is reasonably available will convince you. He's given his opinion that the police are both effective and not generally corrupt. He's not stating this as substantiated fact, but as an opinion.

My own opinion is that Toronto's police is less corrupt than, for instance police in poor African or South American countries. This is namely, IMO, because Toronto police are better paid and thus do not need to resort to bribes. There much more to it than that of course, but all in all, I'd say IMO the Toronto police are relatively free of corruption. I'm not stating this as a fact, just my opinion, which you can reject, ignore, or whatever you please.
 
Yes no one is denying there is no corruption but when a crime wave hits, there is action from the police unlike what you see in other North American cities, who simply just do not care.

It does not excuse corruption though...
 
Taken from http://www.citytv.com/toronto/citynews/news/local/article/60592--giorgio-mammoliti-for-mayor

Giorgio Mammoliti For Mayor?

It’s not even three weeks since Mayor David Miller announced he wouldn’t seek a third term and already one prominent city councillor has expressed his intention to replace him.

In an interview with the National Post, Giorgio Mammoliti confirmed he would run in 2010 on a platform that is tough on crime and enterprising – if uninspired – in its plan to generate revenue.

He intends to pay for initiatives like affordable housing with a tax on the illegal sex trade, a lottery and a casino, which he suggests could be built by the lake on dirt excavated from new subway lines.

As a member of Miller’s executive committee, Mammoliti has been outspoken about the need to crack down on street gangs and massage parlours that operate as fronts for prostitution.

In fact, last spring he was caught with two fellow councillors attending a strip club on their lunch break, but claimed he was on a site visit.

Oddly enough, the right-of-centre politician - slammed for being among the highest spenders on city council and for hiring a private contractor for his ward during the garbage strike - is a former New Democratic Party MPP and union leader.

He was first elected as a councillor in 1995 after losing his provincial seat.

Mammoliti has yet to assemble a team and raise as much as $1.5-million to fund his campaign.
 
I'm not entering a debate on parking, but property taxes in Toronto are reaching well above inflation due to continuous increases in the mill rate since Miller took over and increased housing value assessments from the city.

The residential mill rate in 1999 was 1.2137%
The residential mill rate in 2008 was 0.8749%
The residential mill rate in 2009 is 0.8548%

Tax rates have gone DOWN during Miller's tenure.

And the city has no control over property assessments.

In comparison, the residential mill rate in Mississauga is 1.0176%
 
I am absolutely thrilled Georgio Mammolitti is running for mayor. That leaves his council seat wide open, and gets rid of some deadwood.

Giambrone's star is rising too quickly. That's setting him up for a crash and burn.
 
The residential mill rate in 1999 was 1.2137%
The residential mill rate in 2008 was 0.8749%
The residential mill rate in 2009 is 0.8548%
Thank god Miller is gone; he's clearly dropped the taxation rate too quickly, endangering the future fiscal stability of the city! ;)
 
Tax rates have gone DOWN during Miller's tenure.

And the city has no control over property assessments.
I don't care what the tax rate is, I only care that my taxes to the city have gone way up. If property assessments have increased, then the tax rate should come down to a revenue neutral level.
 
Just interested, did those rates go down because the city did not really increase rates compared to the rapidly rising property values?


Or why else...

From what I recall, he never decreased property taxes. :p
 

Back
Top