News   Apr 17, 2026
 392     0 
News   Apr 17, 2026
 938     1 
News   Apr 17, 2026
 441     0 

New Urban Paradigm For Canadian Cities

rdaner

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
9,358
Reaction score
39,940
I apologize in advance as I am struggling with the correct wording. I am seeing a move away from postWW2 models of urban growth and structure to one that seems to mirror more traditional cities in that they are consistent over the entire built up area. For example the move away from most commercial space being in a single downtown to widely dispersed. Another feature is higher densities in newly built suburban areas. Frankly I see more development that reminds me of what I saw in Istanbul and Bangkok!

If this is what academics are seeing could someone point out sites with more info? And is there a name for this? Post-Covid Global City? Homogenization of Global Cities?
 
I apologize in advance as I am struggling with the correct wording. I am seeing a move away from postWW2 models of urban growth and structure to one that seems to mirror more traditional cities in that they are consistent over the entire built up area. For example the move away from most commercial space being in a single downtown to widely dispersed. Another feature is higher densities in newly built suburban areas. Frankly I see more development that reminds me of what I saw in Istanbul and Bangkok!

If this is what academics are seeing could someone point out sites with more info? And is there a name for this? Post-Covid Global City? Homogenization of Global Cities?

I think your assertion is a bit too general here.

You need to specify what cities you are seeing change in, and from what to what?

Paris, for instance, has never really had a single concentrated commercial node with the possible exception of Le Defense.

Meanwhile, Toronto has long had pockets of density throughout suburban areas in a way that confounds many Americans.

So you need to identify a benchmark or anchor somewhere and say.........they appear to have a new direction.

****

In general, in Canada in particular, there has been a move to boost densities, particularly in both inner and new suburban areas, and building up more of a so-called 15-minute city.

But lets note, Toronto is further from achieving that today than it was 30 years ago, much more sprawl, far longer commutes, and less neighbourhood level grocery, retail and entertainment.

Put another way, talking points aren't necessarily what's actually built.

****

Lets stop for a moment and quickly glance at East York, as inner suburban area, because its one I've looked at before.

Rather than repeat myself, I'll link to my previous post:


Note how much more auto-centric and how much less 15-minute the area has become even as population has increased somewhat.

****

Certainly we're seeing a push to get back towards that.........type of living and that is evolving in downtown Toronto and midtown and a few other pockets to a greater degree, but really, with a few exceptions, we're only re-creating what we actually had in the 1960s and 70s in terms of post-WWII.

The reasons for that are complex and varied and involve more than just Planning philosophy, but shifts in the labour force, economics, demographics and evolving business strategies.

****

Now lets pull back from that and say that certainly we've seen some revival of U.S. downtowns, particularly portions of Chicago around the 'The Loop' and NYC in Harlem, Hell's Kitchen and pockets of Brooklyn....... but I'd be careful about stretching that too far.

Dallas, Houston, Atlanta, and even SF remain very, very sprawly, and with very little indication of change at scale.

I think for the most part the big urban form changes in 'the west' have largely been in Canada and Australia, but I don't think they truly mirror historic patterns in Istanbul, Bangkok or Paris.

****

Finally, terminology.

A city with multiple nodes rather than a single concentrated downtown is 'Polycentric'. or Multi-nodal. If you search those terms you will find papers of interest.

'15 minute Cities' generally describes the vision of areas that can support jobs, school, shopping and employment close at hand.
 
Last edited:
Excellent questions. Just a few clarifications as I am sleepy and must work tomorrow to support my posting problem!
• I see this trend happening in basically all Canadian CMAs.
• Accelerated polycentricism with a dramatic increase in the overall number of significant nodes as well as an increase in their average size. For example while the original 5 suburban city centres are seeing high-levels of growth they are being joined by a dozen newer ones.
• The last decade has seen a decline in single-use projects with the result that newer areas are increasingly multi-use on a fine scale that seems to mimic patterns seen in metros outside NA/Australia.
• The scale of high-density development happening across cities is unlike anything seen in the US. Even Calgary and Edmonton are approaching 70% of all construction being multi-unit which is leading to the emergence of suburban centres.
•Taken all together this appears to be moving most Canadian urban areas to a built-form that more closely resembles that seen in most metros around the world. The suburban areas of every single city that I have been to is remarkably similar in look and layout. Everywhere except for the US.

I know that this is common knowledge which is more elegantly stated by Micalef in ‘Frontier City.’ But I feel that a lot of Canadians outside certain circles haven’t fully accepted it and see it as a good thing.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top