Dan416
Senior Member
Hear hear
Yes, we need innovation in transit. We need LRT, transit priority signals, automated subways, and fare cards. Innovation means new solutions to problems. Whether you like it or not, we will keep on adopting innovations. Vancouver uses the same innovative technology as the SRT, and I think they're proud of their system, a fully grade separated rapid transit system that has as much trackage as ours for a city with at least a million fewer people, built in less than half the time as our rapid transit system.
Ground level power collection might never be that affordable, but if the kinks can be worked out, there are probably some prominent areas where it could be done with a high concentration of tourists, locals. I see as something worth considering at least on a limited basis for parts of the city where we'd like to show our best.
Innovation means new solutions to problems. Whether you like it or not, we will keep on adopting innovations.
Adopting an existing technology is not innovation. The TTC doesn't need innovation, it needs to adopt proven technologies that have been around for years. Presto is innovation... it is creating something new from scratch and who knows when the costs will stop growing and when the issues will end. The SRT was innovation but adopting an additional mode of transportation not compatible with the 4 they already had (bus, trolleybus, streetcar, subway) was dumb. There are examples of proven technology around the world working for transit systems already... they don't need to be innovative. Innovative is building a TTC trip planner when Google does it for free.
There isn't always a 100 year old off-the-shelf product for every problem. The city's residents miss out on a better transit system when certain transit innovations are not implemented like train automation, transit priority signals, electronic fare payments, LRT. Some of these items clearly aren't innovations anymore.
The online trip planner is yet another example. Both an in-house solution and Google's products are varieties of the same innovative idea.
Considering both Google and their in-house version were implemented I fail to see the benefit of their innovation.
I understand there to be a subtle change in rhetoric here, from the usefulness of adopting innovations to the usefulness of the TTC's own innovations. But I think you see the benefit of the innovation that is Google's trip planner.
Given we just voted in a mayor that's promised to cancel them.Pardon my being new to this thread. When are we due to receive the new streetcars and on which routes will they go?
That would make him a liar ... oh hang on, Rob Ford is one of the biggest liars ever ... you may have a point.It's not gonna happen. It was campaign rhetoric like many of the undeliverable promises he made. Essentially, he'll stick to his message of not wasting money and breaking the contract on this order would be wasting money.
Prototypes constructed in Europe in late 2011, with operational vehicles in 2013.When are they scheduled to arrive?