Toronto Nathan Phillips Square + Spirit Garden | ?m | ?s | City of Toronto

From last Saturday:

DSC00263s.jpg


DSC00264s.jpg


DSC00267s.jpg


DSC00268s.jpg


DSC00271s.jpg


DSC00272s.jpg


DSC00273s.jpg


DSC00275s.jpg


DSC00276s.jpg


And of course, it's truly disappointing to see a litany of beer cans - if one can't even keep their own nest clean, how much confidence can we have in one's ability to keep its' surrounding neat and tidy?

DSC00269s.jpg


DSC00270s.jpg


AoD
 

Attachments

  • DSC00263s.jpg
    DSC00263s.jpg
    463.6 KB · Views: 1,894
  • DSC00264s.jpg
    DSC00264s.jpg
    383.7 KB · Views: 1,872
  • DSC00267s.jpg
    DSC00267s.jpg
    407.7 KB · Views: 1,853
  • DSC00268s.jpg
    DSC00268s.jpg
    534.9 KB · Views: 1,886
  • DSC00271s.jpg
    DSC00271s.jpg
    453.8 KB · Views: 1,812
  • DSC00272s.jpg
    DSC00272s.jpg
    582.6 KB · Views: 1,815
  • DSC00273s.jpg
    DSC00273s.jpg
    570.6 KB · Views: 1,782
  • DSC00275s.jpg
    DSC00275s.jpg
    535.1 KB · Views: 1,796
  • DSC00276s.jpg
    DSC00276s.jpg
    733.6 KB · Views: 1,818
  • DSC00269s.jpg
    DSC00269s.jpg
    493.5 KB · Views: 1,824
  • DSC00270s.jpg
    DSC00270s.jpg
    710.7 KB · Views: 1,832
Thanks for the photos. Alvin :) i loved it. Are those trees supposed to be the cherry blossoms? And are they gonna plant lots of trees as in the renderings? thanks. :)
 
Talking about Chicago, this is not exactly a growing prosperous city.
Just look at the population numbers.
There are less people in Chicago now than in 1930.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago#Demographics

Year Population %
1900 1,698,575 54.4%
1910 2,185,283 28.7%
1920 2,701,705 23.6%
1930 3,376,438 25.0%
1940 3,396,808 0.6%
1950 3,620,962 6.6%
1960 3,550,404 −1.9%
1970 3,366,957 −5.2%
1980 3,005,072 −10.7%
1990 2,783,726 −7.4%
2000 2,896,016 4.0%
2010 2,695,598 −6.9%
2013 2,718,782 0.9% (estimated)
 
Talking about Chicago, this is not exactly a growing prosperous city.
Just look at the population numbers.
There are less people in Chicago now than in 1930.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago#Demographics

Year Population %
1900 1,698,575 54.4%
1910 2,185,283 28.7%
1920 2,701,705 23.6%
1930 3,376,438 25.0%
1940 3,396,808 0.6%
1950 3,620,962 6.6%
1960 3,550,404 −1.9%
1970 3,366,957 −5.2%
1980 3,005,072 −10.7%
1990 2,783,726 −7.4%
2000 2,896,016 4.0%
2010 2,695,598 −6.9%
2013 2,718,782 0.9% (estimated)

A superficial look at the above data may give the impression that Chicago is not a prosperous, vibrant city, some contextual information may help put issues into perspective. Increased prosperity and the growing availability of contraception over the past sixty years has resulted in a substantial drop in average family size. So, while within Chicago city limits, the total number of families, the number of housing units, may be stable, or even growing, the total population shank because of the reduction in average family size. Chicagoland as a whole, including the outside city limits suburbs, would be a different matter. The same thing has happened in a number of areas in Toronto, witness the situation a number of our schools are in with their declining enrollments.

Not to say that Chicago is without problems - its financial situation is indeed dire. And, depending on how one draws the boundaries, Toronto has had a greater rate of overall growth - but the basic statistics cited above could, by themselves, be quite misleading.
 
Now that the temperatures are almost of Summer Hopefully they started planting lots of cherry blossoms trees at Nathan Phillips New Peace Garden.
 

Attachments

  • 958978720_27502a2183_b.jpg
    958978720_27502a2183_b.jpg
    396.9 KB · Views: 788
Here's how it looked yesterday:

IMG_7406.jpg


IMG_7407.jpg


IMG_7408.jpg


IMG_7409.jpg


IMG_7411.jpg


IMG_7413.jpg


IMG_7414.jpg


IMG_7415.jpg


The Archer was getting its annual torching yesterday, a little maintenance to keep it young. There was a flame to be seen, but difficult in the wind.

IMG_7417.jpg


IMG_7416.jpg


42
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7406.jpg
    IMG_7406.jpg
    275.3 KB · Views: 1,581
  • IMG_7407.jpg
    IMG_7407.jpg
    208.1 KB · Views: 1,558
  • IMG_7408.jpg
    IMG_7408.jpg
    326.3 KB · Views: 1,558
  • IMG_7409.jpg
    IMG_7409.jpg
    270.3 KB · Views: 1,539
  • IMG_7411.jpg
    IMG_7411.jpg
    263.8 KB · Views: 1,553
  • IMG_7413.jpg
    IMG_7413.jpg
    248.8 KB · Views: 1,506
  • IMG_7414.jpg
    IMG_7414.jpg
    223.7 KB · Views: 1,512
  • IMG_7415.jpg
    IMG_7415.jpg
    234.6 KB · Views: 1,525
  • IMG_7416.jpg
    IMG_7416.jpg
    318 KB · Views: 1,498
  • IMG_7417.jpg
    IMG_7417.jpg
    250 KB · Views: 1,503

Back
Top