News   Nov 13, 2024
 1K     0 
News   Nov 13, 2024
 951     4 
News   Nov 13, 2024
 971     2 

Leslieville / Studio District

STORE WARS

Wal-Mart supercentres `threat' to grocers

TONY BOCK/TORONTO STAR
Consumers don’t stop shopping when the economy slows, but often change their shopping patterns, notes Wal-Mart spokesperson Andrew Pelletier.

May 09, 2008 04:30 AM
DANA FLAVELLE
BUSINESS REPORTER

Canada's largest discount retailer says it plans to open a lot more combined food and general merchandise stores this year, further challenging established grocers and helping boost Wal-Mart Canada Corp.'s overall sales.

The Canadian unit said it plans to open between 25 and 27 new stores this year, most of them supercentres, the kind that combine a full supermarket with its usual offering of electronics, toys, clothing and housewares.

Analysts said the retailer's growth plans suggest Wal-Mart may be gaining at the expense of competitors.

"The opening of Wal-Mart Supercentres is expected to be a long-term threat to the incumbent Canadian grocers," said David Hartley, an analyst at BMO Capital Markets. "We believe the growth in grocery at Wal-Mart exceeds the high single digits you referenced, which would mean that they are stealing market share from someone."

Wal-Mart Canada said it is benefiting from consumers' growing concern about potential economic weakness and curiosity about its new supercentres.

"I think we're seeing what every other retailer is seeing. During times when there are high gas prices, high commodity prices and concerns about the economy, consumers don't stop shopping but they often change their shopping patterns," said Wal-Mart spokesperson Andrew Pelletier.

"In this type of environment, Wal-Mart tends to be a smart choice for a lot of people. That's one reason you're seeing steady growth."

The retailer said yesterday that most of the 25 to 27 new stores it will open this year would contain full supermarkets alongside the usual general mechandise.

"Roughly 24 will be supercentres," Pelletier said. About half of them will be built in Ontario, where Wal-Mart opened the first such stores 18 months ago.

Only two or three stores will be the more traditional type of Wal-Mart that carries general merchandise and dried goods, but no fresh meat or produce or baked goods.

The number of new stores is in line with prior years, but the supercentres are larger, so the current plan involves "somewhat more square footage," Pelletier acknowledged. "Many of the supercentres are larger than the (traditional) discount stores. But every market is different."

Existing Wal-Mart supercentres in Canada range in size from 140,000 square feet to 200,000 square feet, he said

The company currently operates 32 supercentres across the country, in Ontario, Alberta and British Columbia. By the end of this fiscal year, in January 2009, it will have roughly 50 such stores across Canada.

Calling it a "milestone" year, the U.S-owned retailer, which entered Canada in 1994, said it will open its 300th Canadian store this spring, in Mississauga's Heartland Centre.

The announcement came as Wal-Mart's U.S. parent company reported better-than-expected monthly sales for April, including at its Canadian division.

Wal-Mart Canada enjoyed sales growth in the "high single digits" in April, Wal-Mart Stores Inc. said. That's an improvement over the first three months, when sales were either "in the low single digits" or "positive."

Overall, retail sales in the U.S. rebounded in April as warmer weather boosted clothing sales, with discounters and warehouse club operators, such as Wal-Mart and Costco, performing better than others.

Wal-Mart said April sales at U.S. stores open more than a year rose 3.2 per cent, slightly more than expected as consumers shopped for bargains. The U.S. stores lowered prices by as much as 30 per cent in January as problems in the U.S. subprime mortgage market hurt consumer spending.

At Costco, sales at U.S. stores open more than a year roared ahead 8 per cent, partly on sales of higher priced gasoline and exchange rate gains at its 75 Canadian stores.

Wal-Mart's growth plans for Canada do not currently include a controversial location in Toronto's Leslieville neighbourhood. Pelletier said no decision has been made on that site.

http://www.thestar.com/Business/article/423129
 
Surprise, surprise...the judicial system DOES work occasionally.

Looks like we might find out more about the 629 Eastern, FilmPort and Corus shady deals after all...

Today, from What's Wrong Toronto site:

Tedco Loses Freedom of Information Ruling at Ontario Court of Appeal
May 9th, 2008


Three cheers for Peter Lukas the tenacious owner of Showline. His actions have forced the Miller government to adhere to the provincial laws of accountability.

Ol’ Jeffy boy better get that shredder in high gear

Get ready …we want to see it all…

Oh Jeff all those dirty deals…….you got a lot hide…squirm…..squirm….

Mark my words, Jeff Steiner is the highest paid civil servant in the province.

Henceforth, you must now retroactively report your salary.

But truly, what is more profound for the City of Toronto is that, case precedent has now been established, at the highest court in Ontario. Indeed, Mayor David Miller who ordered this judicial review can no longer hide his dirty broom behind any of the City’s “arm’s lengthagency’sâ€.
 
Text of Showline's Press Release on Court Decision

May 9, 2008 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE


ONTARIO COURT OF APPEAL RULES IN FAVOUR OF MORE TRANSPARENCY AT TORONTO CITY HALL


On Thursday, May 8th 2008, the Court of Appeal for Ontario ruled in favour of more transparency at Toronto City Hall, stating in their unanimous decision that:

“…TEDCO is just another example of a complex bureaucratic structure of public administration…it is contrary to the purpose of the Act and access to information legislation in general to permit the City to evade its statutory duty to provide its residents with access to information simply by delegating its powers to a board of directors over which it holds ultimate authority.â€

This case dates back to September of 2005, when the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario ruled that the City of Toronto Economic Development Corporation (TEDCO) was subject to the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (“MFIPPAâ€), and therefore was required to respond to Showline Studios’ Request for Information with respect to TEDCO’s controversial Portlands Film Studio project.

TEDCO later appealed the Information and Privacy Commissioner’s ruling. In an Ontario Superior Divisional Court ruling in November of 2006, two of three judges held that TEDCO should not be subject to the MFIPPA. The third judge dissented, and Leave to Appeal to the Court of Appeal was granted, where the case was heard in November of 2007 and where the verdict in this case was released yesterday. “In my opinion, it is unconscionable that any agency of our City attempt to conduct its business in secrecy, and outside the scrutiny of the general publicâ€, said Peter Lukas, President of Showline.

TEDCO’s Portlands Film Studio project involves an incentive-laden, 99-year lease on a massive tract of land, and is linked to the controversial rezoning and removal of existing studios in Toronto’s Studio District, to be replaced by a big-box retail development. Other recent transactions by TEDCO that have attracted the attention of both the public and the media have been the development of Project Symphony, a sole-sourced design and build office project on the waterfront, and the untendered sale of public lands at Midland Avenue and St. Clair Avenue East.

In response to the Bellamy Report on the MFP Computer Leasing scandal in Toronto in 2005, Mayor David Miller publicly stated “Though it is not in the report, I would like to see all RFP responses and tenders made public - if this had been the case last time around, the MFP scandal might never have happened.â€

Access to TEDCO records is of particular interest to the City’s reeling film industry, given the net loss of studio space resulting from both the Portlands Studio deal and the expedited Project Symphony, which displaced another studio facility without relocation. It will also be of interest to Toronto taxpayers, given that TEDCO owns some 400 acres of land in the Portlands and lifetime, non-market deals could result in City coffers being shortchanged by hundreds of millions of dollars, dwarfing the losses of the MFP affair.

-30-
 
http://www.citynews.ca/news/news_22557.aspx

Toronto Readies Megafilm Studio Even As Industry Sags
Friday May 9, 2008
CityNews.ca Staff

Toronto's stepping back into the movie making spotlight, embarking on a massive project to bring a sagging Hollywood North back to life.

Seven state of the art soundstages are nearing completion at FilmPort, Toronto's new mega film studio on 20 hectares in the Portlands.

Although Toronto was once a much sought-after location for film makers, a series of factors have severely hampered the local industry.

A strong dollar, less than ideal facilities, strong tax incentives state side, and a looming Screen Actors Guild strike, combined to make the movie industry in T.O. dry up.

The new centre is hoping to once again attract the big guns in film making.

"This is what we've been missing in Toronto, is large sound stages. Then we can do $100 million films, $200 million films, and that's not something that a lot of people could just steal away from us," explains Ken Ferguson, President, Filmport.

Joe Fraser and Bob Pearson certainly hope things change, between them they have more than 50 years experience building sets, but are forced to work in renovations most of the time.

At least they're on the job --- some estimates show 70-80% of film industry workers are unemployed.

"I'm really looking forward to Filmport and it's going to fit a specific need but that's not the only answer, we can't all work at Filmport," said Fraser.

The official opening for phase 1 of FilmPort is June 5th.
 
VIDEO.....http://www.torontosun.com/News/TorontoAndGTA/2008/05/07/5492471-sun.html

Those in the know say T.O.'s film industry is in dire straits, with 70% of trades workers unemployed

Wed, May 7, 2008

By JOE WARMINGTON

T.O. film industry's troubled times

Sun Media's Joe Warmington speaks with IATSE members about Toronto's bleak film future


Joe Fraser has built sets for Hollywood movies filmed in Toronto for decades.

These days, the professional carpenter is building backyard fences. Everybody has to eat and he is not alone when it comes to looking for ways to make ends meet.

According to some estimates, 70% of the trades workers who derive their income from the film industry are currently unemployed.

"It's dire," said Kirk Cheney, business agent for the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees (IATSE), Local 873. "We are being gutted here."

At the height of film production, this city had more than 25,000 people working.

"I think you'd be lucky if you'd find a few thousand today," said Cheney. "Right now our guys only have two shows going."

As film set driver, Lorne Frederick points out "if this was the automotive industry, this would be on the front page of the paper every day."

It certainly is just as important an industry to Toronto which had many spin-off benefits and has brought a lot of prestige to the city, too.

But times are changing. For example, Toronto just lost another production -- a film called 9 -- to Montreal. "That one was a $90-million production," said Cheney. "It hurts."

Meanwhile, they still have bills to pay. Fraser said: "I am getting work, by word of mouth. I'll do fences or gates or any reno jobs."

If he does some carpentry for you, get him to tell you about working on The Incredible Hulk film, The Love Guru or even Chicago and Cinderella Man.

Those were the days. Will he experience them again?

Some believe if extreme measures are not undertaken, it's an industry that could be on its way out locally.

"I would certainly hope not," said Bob Hall, president of IATSE, Local 873, which represents Fraser, as well as other technicians in props, wardrobe, special effects and transportation. "But if ever a time it is in jeopardy, we are close to that time."

He would know, since only about 750 of his 2,500 members are working, thanks to such reasons as a highly valued Canadian dollar.

However, Hall said a "perfect storm" of problems began with SARS in 2003.

"You combine that with the rising dollar, the writers strike, a potential ACTRA strike, increased tax incentives in other jurisdictions and the lack of studio space available here and you have got a problem," said Hall.

He warned if they want a film industry here, all levels of government had best pay attention.

"It's actually a manufacturing industry, and one with low environmental impact," said Hall, who added that Mayor David Miller and Councillor Paula Fletcher have a good grasp of the issues.

The goal is to show other levels that this manufacturer is "green" and "we pick up what we use" while the producers leave "bags of money" here, which "stays here." Hall believes no government can ignore people working on films get well paid, pay their taxes, raise their families and buy cars and homes.

Perhaps, not any more. In fact, huge tax credits in locations like New York State and Michigan are another reason so many productions have left. While Toronto offers a 25% film tax credit on labour, New York is offering 35% -- and similar rebates on materials, too.

While Toronto is stagnant, there is some excitement about the expected 2008 completion of the giant Filmport studio down on Commissioners St. in the Portlands -- that it will open up a new avenue for the Hollywood blockbuster. It will be home to the world's biggest sound stage but those out of work worry it will be too little, too late.

"The new studio will be for huge shows," said Cheney. "And huge shows are a rare event."

He said it's the "medium and small stuff" that pays the bills. "That new studio will be great, but it will be very expensive and the studios we now work (in) on Eastern Ave. will no longer be there."

Once the studio is ready, there's talk about turning that area into a big box store zone which the trades workers feel will mean more lost jobs.

"You have to remember that is my factory," said Fraser, who understands factories do shut down when they are no longer competitive.

Anybody need a new fence?
 
Maple Leaf Forever Park

I changed my usual Saturday morning jogging route to the east to taken in the park. It's actually very nice -- Maple Cottage fronts onto Alton, with a pretty side garden that then links into a courtyard at the east end of MLF park. The rest of the park is a gently sloping hill with walkway and a few small maples that ends at the garages of the infill townhouses between Sears and Brick (while nothing special, they're actually not bad.) Park is bigger than I remembered, but still quite small.

Apparently, some amateur painters are using the cottage as home base for some classes, according to the signage.

South of the park is a wooded lot -- not in great shape, sort of wild -- then a crappy yard with stuff dumped in it (an abandoned truck, etc.) so MLF actually makes for a nice calming oasis in the midst of the city.
 
Canada's Largest Film Studio Complex no more?

Why is TFS going from a total of 20 sound stages with a variety of sizes, to a site with only 7 stages and a total of 12? (Are they keeping Jumbo Stage?) Keep both sites open and they can stay as "Canada's Largest Film Studio Provider". 27 sounds stages, ranging from 45,900 sq. ft to 1,500 sq. ft. Aren't we suppose to be expanding Toronto's film industry? Like Vancouver did in the 90's.

If the dollar was 70 cents no one would think of closing studio space. Filmport is a 5 year plan, will the dollar still be at par in 5 years? When the Filmport stages are complete that would give TFS a total for 34 sound stages in Toronto.


"Putting our collective eggs in one mega-basket is not the answer. The key to growing our local film industry is through investment and expansion of our existing film studio facilities." -Ken Ferguson President of Toronto Film Studios, September 2000
 
Some more fuel for the fire.....


The big-box angle on retail

Peter Kuitenbrouwer, National Post
Published: Monday, May 12, 2008

Chris Young for National Post

Tom Smith, vice-president of development for Smart!Centres, and Sandra Kaiser, its spokeswoman, suggested we meet at Tim Hortons on Lake Shore Boulevard, so they could explain their plans to plunk a $200-million shopping complex here in 2011. I proposed Mercury Espresso Bar on Queen Street East, to which they agreed; but when I got there, Ms. Kaiser called to say they were across the street at Joy Bistro.

They looked quite comfortable in the bistro, Mr. Smith eating a pulled pork sandwich and sipping white wine, Ms. Kaiser eating salad. Many around here want to ride them out of Leslieville on a rail, as attested by the "No Big Box in Leslieville" posters in many shop windows (including Mercury's but not Joy's). Smart!Centres, owned by Toronto's Goldhar family, insists that it belongs. It may be hard to generate much sympathy for Canada's largest retail developer, which opens a new shopping centre every three or four weeks, generally anchored by a Wal-Mart. Still, Mr. Smith insists his firm is the wronged party in what is shaping up as the city's most dramatic planning showdown since Minto vanquished North Toronto ratepayers to erect skyscrapers at Yonge and Eglinton.

"We don't understand why we're having so much trouble with this project," says Mr. Smith. Mainly he blames one person: the local councillor, Paula Fletcher (Toronto-Danforth).

"Paula is a very strong councillor, she's on the Mayor's executive committee, she's very much in the NDP fold and she's very good, but we don't think it's been very fair."

The proposed site currently houses Toronto Film Studios in an old foundry; by year-end TFS will move to a new home at Film Port south of here. City Council turned down Smart!Centres' application to rezone this employment land for retail, so the developer appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board, a provincial body that can overrule council. (At the OMB, Smart!Centres won a 10-year battle with Guelph council to put a Wal-Mart in that town).

I have written critically of the Foundry District development in the past, and thought it only fair to give the other side a hearing. Some history of Smart!Centres in Leslieville, as told by Mr. Smith, previews the company's arguments at the OMB hearing, which begins on May 21. In August, 2006, he says, his firm paid about $14-million for a 50% share of the 18.5-acre site (the Rose Corporation owns the other half.) Smart!Centres waited, he says, until Toronto's official plan, which permitted big-box retail on the site, became law.

"Three weeks later they amended the official plan with a new official plan amendment called OPA 5, which prohibited power centres and retail and talked about employment," Mr. Smith says. "We were sorta dumbfounded that that happened so quickly. It's not normal to spend five years on an official plan and then immediately decide that what you said was a good use is no longer appropriate."

The company will show the OMB renderings of the 700,000-square foot project, depicting two-storey brick shops with entrances onto Eastern Avenue and Lake Shore, and people biking out front, and add that, "the kind of retail dollars people will spend at our project are currently leaving the neighbourhood."

"Smart!Centres has done a lot of traditional greenfield 905 big box retail," says Mr. Smith, who joined the firm two years ago and lives in the Scarborough Bluffs. "We are changing the company from within. Retailers have realized that there are a lot of inner city markets that are not being served."

Gary Wright, Toronto's new chief planner, is unmoved.

"We don't think 19 acres of retail with 1,900 parking spaces is the right use," he says. "We think higher employment uses are needed. Retail was not part of our vision for an employment area. You want to go to a power centre, go to Warden and Eglinton.''

Kelly Carmichaell, chair of the East Toronto Community Coalition, one of the parties opposing Smart!Centres at the OMB, calls the plan "big box in a party dress." Ms. Fletcher says: "It might look nice, but the jobs are minimum wage."

Mr. Smith tells me 2,000 jobs at $30,000 a year each will bring $60-million a year to Leslieville (he later admits the jobs may well pay more like $20,000 a year). Whatever those numbers, he says, council is simply on the wrong side of retail change.

"If planning doesn't realize the market forces that are at work, then their plan will never be realized," he says. "If we don't build this centre, guys are still going to get in their cars and go to Eglinton or go to North York. Folks are resistant to change. But we're not telling them they have to shop here."

Perhaps Smart!Centres is the victim of some local bitterness, as Leslieville has watched a high Canadian dollar decimate its thriving film industry. Nature abhors a vacuum, and everyone needs a vacuum cleaner.

pkuitenbrouwer@nationalpost.com
 
Mr. Smith tells me 2,000 jobs at $30,000 a year each will bring $60-million a year to Leslieville (he later admits the jobs may well pay more like $20,000 a year). Whatever those numbers, he says, council is simply on the wrong side of retail change.

Let's say that stocking shelves or working the cash pays $9/hour. Assuming that these people work 40 hours a week and 50 weeks a year, that still amounts to $18,000 before tax.

Of course, it's far less than that because these are part time jobs.
 
"If planning doesn't realize the market forces that are at work, then their plan will never be realized," he says. "If we don't build this centre, guys are still going to get in their cars and go to Eglinton or go to North York. Folks are resistant to change

Except that market forces doesn't happen in a vacuum - the TIF scheme just passed by council for example could just as easily lead to a change in land use that favours more intensive use of the site by businesses with more value-added to it than big box retail.

But we're not telling them they have to shop here.

But you are telling them you have to build it here.

AoD
 
Film production jobs are unionized and green

Lest we forget that film industry jobs are almost entirely unionized and that the film industry has a low environmental impact i.e. it's really quite green. Unionized and green, exactly the recipe spelled out in this report for a healthy Ontario economy, exactly the jobs about to be displaced on Eastern Avenue by SmartCentre's part-time retail jobs. OMB, please do the right thing and reject this senseless rezoning application.

- - - - - - -

Retool manufacturing to stimulate economy, report recommends

May 12, 2008 04:30 AM
LAURIE MONSEBRAATEN
SOCIAL JUSTICE REPORTER

Turning Ontario's vanishing blue-collar manufacturing jobs into stable, well-paying "green-collar" employment in the emerging green economy should be central to poverty-proofing the province, says a new report.

Ontario has the second-largest manufacturing workforce on the continent after California, yet the province seriously lags behind American states in retooling shuttered factories for the green industries of the future, notes the report, entitled "Work isn't Working for Ontario Families."

"In the United States, cross-sectoral coalitions ... are working to create jobs and renew the manufacturing sector by focusing on green economic opportunities," says the report by Campaign 2000, the Toronto Labour Council and the Ontario branch of the Canadian Labour Congress.

Campaign 2000 is a national non-profit coalition of groups and individuals dedicated to ensuring Parliament lives up to its pledge to eliminate child poverty.

"Government has a leadership role to play providing policy frameworks, incentives and direct support for the development of new green manufacturing and services," the report says.

As Ontario loses manufacturing jobs, too many Ontario workers are becoming trapped in bad jobs with lousy wages, few benefits and no security, says the report's author Ann Decter, head of Campaign 2000.

Turning those bad jobs into good jobs is key to lifting children out of poverty, maintaining social order and ensuring the province's long-term economic prosperity.

The 27-page report, to be released at Queen's Park today, calls on the McGuinty government to kick-start the transformation by updating provincial labour laws, removing barriers to unionization of low-wage workplaces, investing in public goods and services and turning Ontario into a manufacturing hub for new green industries.

"Ontario parents need access to a job that allows them to provide an adequate living standard for their children and offers enough financial security to weather the crises of everyday life and plan for the future," the report says.

"Within the broad range of its powers, the provincial government can do much to lead labour and the private sector into a change process to the benefit of low-income children whose parents are struggling to build a secure life," it adds.

Statistics show parents are working and jobs are available, says the report, noting that Ontario's unemployment rate was just 6.1 per cent in February. The problem is that stable, well-paying manufacturing jobs that helped build the province's middle class over the past 30 years are disappearing and being replaced by low-wage service sector, temporary and contract work.

Of Ontario's 345,000 poor kids, 41 per cent had a parent who was working full-time all year, the report says.

The report uses Statistics Canada's pre-tax, low-income cut-off as a measure of the minimum salary of a good job. For a family of four in a large city like Toronto a "good-job" salary was $40,259 in 2007. For that same family in a smaller community, it was $34,671.

The average worker who loses a manufacturing job in Ontario experiences a 25 per cent cut in income when he or she finds new work, the report says. For Toronto parent Phuong Le, 48, who lost her $44,000-a-year job assembling light switches in 2005, the drop was even more dramatic. Today she works part time at a big box retailer earning just $14,000 annually.

"I would like to work more hours but all they will give me is part time," says Le, who didn't want her real name used for fear of retribution from her employer.

For Le and her husband, both immigrants who have lived and worked in Toronto for 28 and 35 years, respectively, factory work allowed them to raise their son and daughter in a stable middle-class home. But today, as work dwindles at the auto-parts plant where her 51-year-old husband works, Le fears for the future.

"If my husband gets laid off, I don't know what we'll do," she says. "We are too old to retrain and too young to retire. Nobody wants us."

Instead of wringing our hands over the 205,000 manufacturing jobs Ontario lost between 2002 and 2007, the province should follow the example of many U.S. states that are wooing green jobs, said John Cartwright, head of the Toronto and York Region Labour Council.

The report welcomes the province's recent decision to fast-track the start-up of its Next Generation Jobs Fund with $1.5 billion for support to companies that produce green products or save energy. But a broader strategy that links government policy, private sector innovation, labour know-how and environmental science is needed to turn blue-collar jobs into "green-collar" employment, Cartwright says.

The province must also help improve wages and working conditions in temporary and non-standard employment, primarily in the growing service sector, the report says.

Regulating marginalized work and removing barriers to unionization, which helped turn manufacturing into good middle-class jobs in the 1950s and '60s, will help transform these jobs too, the report says.

Toronto father Julio Silva, 41, has first-hand knowledge of the benefits of unionization. When Silva moved here with his family from Brazil in 2005, the teacher and his psychologist wife could only get non-union office and condo-cleaning jobs that paid little more than minimum wage with no benefits.

For many years, Silva worked three separate jobs – a morning, evening and weekend shift, to support the couple's daughter, now 8.

But two years ago, Silva got a part-time job as a janitor for the Toronto District School Board and saw his hourly wage jump to $18, meaning he could spend weekends with his family.

He's hoping to get full-time work with the school board so that he can give up his office cleaning job to spend more time with his daughter during the day.

"The TDSB is a good union job that pays good wages and benefits," he says.

"All cleaners should have the same opportunities."


WAR ON POVERTY: VANISHING JOBS
'Green' fix urged for Ontario's job blues

MICHAEL STUPARYK/TORONTO STAR

SPEAK OUT: CAN GOVERNMENT MAKE A DIFFERENCE?
ONTARIO JOBS AND WAGES GOING 'GREEN'

Strategies to replace vanishing blue-collar manufacturing work:

Regulation and unionization

• Ensure paid work covered by employment standards law.

• Hire 100 more provincial labour inspectors; inspect 25 per cent of workplaces annually; beef up fines for violators.

• Remove barriers to unionization by allowing organizing by occupation and restoring card check certification to all sectors.

Investing in public goods and services

• Resist pressure to privatize health care, education jobs.

• Invest in public infrastructure to improve communities and create jobs.

• Raise qualifications and wages in the social service sector.

Growing the green economy

• Replace blue collar jobs with "green collar" employment.

• Provide a market for local green industries by beefing up environmental protection laws.

• Ensure provincial procurement for green energy and transportation projects.


http://www.thestar.com/News/GTA/article/424378
 
Nothing like developing for the future as if this were the past.

Garage guys look at nuts and bolts of big-box plan

May 07, 2008 04:30 AM
ANTONIA ZERBISIAS

Pat and John Panagos were just teenagers when I first started taking my car for service at Downtown Gas & Auto.

That was in 1985, when their dad John Sr. still ran the former Shell station – which no longer sells gas – he founded at Carlaw and Eastern 40 years ago.

If you want to know what's up in the area, you ask his boys, who grew up there, as did their ace mechanic Darren Gale.

They've seen a lot of changes. Former factories are now high-priced lofts. Junk-filled front yards have been transformed into artfully landscaped gardens.

Queen St. E., which was lined with pawn shops and tattoo parlours, now boasts trendy restos, cool furniture shops and organic butchers.

Still, the corner of Carlaw and Eastern has retained its gritty character – and so it, as well as the service station, have starred in movies such as Hairspray and Get Rich or Die Trying.

Not for nothing is the area known as the Film District, the location of many production houses plus support services. But the business – thanks to the strong loonie and California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger's protective policies – is not what it used to be.

Which brings us to the 7.5-hectare mall that Smart!Centres, Canada's biggest retail developer, wants to build up the street from the station.

Oh, the Smart! folks are not marketing it like one of their usual downtown-killing exurban big-box power centres. The two- and three-storey brick complex has been gussied up as the Foundry District, a "new urban lifestyle centre."

They're buying newspaper ads and papering the neighbourhood with their propaganda.

If it gets approval from the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB), it will occupy the former Toronto Film Studios site as well as the ruins of the old A. & R. Clarke Tannery that, when it burned down in 2001, spewed ash for days on the up-and-coming neighbourhood.

It's currently not a pretty place, and it adds nothing to the community or the streetscape.

But at least it doesn't add to the traffic that now clogs Carlaw and speeds along Eastern on its way to Ajax, Pickering and Scarborough.

"This is a gateway to the city," says John Jr., pointing to the cars whizzing by at noon on Monday.

Although Smart!Centres talks up its landscaping and pedestrian walkways, the plan is for 1,900 parking spaces.

Not only will the entrances cut into the Martin Goodman multi-use trail in three places, activists say, based on a formula from the Institute of Transportation Engineers, the mall will result in some 14 million car trips over the course of a year – not counting the truck deliveries to the retailers.

"You already can't get in or out of this lot during rush hour," says Pat, adding that the intersection is now so dangerous that he sees an accident just about every week.

Darren, who still lives a stone's throw away, points out that there are two elementary schools, as well as numerous seniors residences, within a block of the proposed mall.

"People will get killed,'' he predicts.

But John Jr., who has a loft nearby, believes the development will be a boon because the area is "depressing."

What's more, he points out, there's not much else that can be done there, since it is heavily contaminated.

"For a neighbourhood that has homes worth half a million or more, cleaning up Eastern Ave. would be a good thing," he insists.

As for the traffic and pollution, John says it's getting "worse and worse" every year anyway.

But then, he is in the car business. And his hope is, along with the other boys, is to convert their repair shop back into a gas station.

Build the parking lot and the cars will come.

Nothing like developing for the future as if this were the past.

http://www.thestar.com/living/article/422174
 

Back
Top