jn_12
Senior Member
^ It's not "anal". You wouldn't expect people to write Marcum or Turonto and if people kept making those errors you'd find the general ignorance of people to be annoying as hell. If you can't get that right, your knowledge of the area can't be much better.
Thanks for that. It really deflates this idea with reality. It probably makes the price even larger than our $10b estimate. You're probably looking at double or even triple that, which makes this idea even more absurd.I believe the bridge would have to be the longest (50+ KM) and deepest (100-120 metres) in the world.
There was a ferry at one point. And there were rumblings earlier in the decade that they wanted to reintroduce this service. I can't imagine they'd be able to recoup any of the costs though since time is money and no one would willingly put their truck on a boat when there is perfectly good highway infrastructure in place.What if they had a ferry to take the trucks from Toronto < -> Niagara. That'd reduce the amount of trucks on the QEW for sure. Fuel savings probably be well worth it.
Although a bridge is a bit too extreme... If they're going to do that, why don't they build a bridge to the US from Toronto... I'm sure that'd work out.
Totally.How about "St. Catherine's"... that's nails on a chalkboard
Exactly. That would be an immensely better investment.Not going to happen, and not even a good idea. We could build a high speed rail line from St Catharines to Toronto for less, and it'd be faster.