News   Nov 04, 2024
 250     3 
News   Nov 04, 2024
 373     0 
News   Nov 04, 2024
 446     0 

Harper Tories to Cut Funding for "Offensive" Films

unimaginative2

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
4,554
Reaction score
11
Location
New York
Evangelist takes credit for film crackdown

Christian crusader says he pressured cabinet ministers and PMO officials to deny tax credits to productions deemed too offensive
BILL CURRY AND GAYLE MACDONALD

From Friday's Globe and Mail

February 29, 2008 at 4:00 AM EST

OTTAWA, TORONTO — A well-known evangelical crusader is claiming credit for the federal government's move to deny tax credits to TV and film productions that contain graphic sex and violence or other offensive content.

Charles McVety, president of the Canada Family Action Coalition, said his lobbying efforts included discussions with Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day and Justice Minister Rob Nicholson, and "numerous" meetings with officials in the Prime Minister's Office.

"We're thankful that someone's finally listening," he said yesterday. "It's fitting with conservative values, and I think that's why Canadians voted for a Conservative government."

Mr. McVety said films promoting homosexuality, graphic sex or violence should not receive tax dollars, and backbench Conservative MPs and cabinet ministers support his campaign.

"There are a number of Conservative backbench members that do a lot of this work behind the scenes," he said.

Mr. Day and Mr. Nicholson said through officials yesterday they did not recall discussing the issue with Mr. McVety.

Canadian Heritage officials confirmed yesterday they will be "expanding slightly" the criteria used for denying tax credits to include grounds such as gratuitous violence, significant sexual content that lacks an educational purpose, or denigration of an identifiable group. More details are promised next week.

Arts groups say they will fight the change. Director David Cronenberg and other big industry names warned that the edgy, low-budget films that have garnered Canadians international acclaim will be at risk.

Conservatives deny that the changes are driven by politics or Mr. McVety, noting the previous Liberal government pledged to review the guidelines as far back as 2003.

Conservative MP Dave Batters recently urged the new president of Telefilm Canada, Michel Roy, to block federal funding for objectionable films, listing Young People Fucking as a recent example.

"In my mind, sir, and in the minds of many of my colleagues and many, many Canadians," said Mr. Batters during a Jan. 31 meeting of the Canadian Heritage committee, "the purpose of Telefilm is to help facilitate the making of films for mainstream Canadian society - films that Canadians can sit down and watch with their families in living rooms across this great country."

In addition to the tax credits for labour costs, Telefilm is a second source of revenue for Canadian film producers. Mr. Roy pledged to raise the issue with the Telefilm board, but a spokesman said yesterday that no policy changes have been made.

Mr. Batters said yesterday he does not support censorship, but offensive films should be made with private money.

"If there's a market for that, let people pay the $11," he said.

Draft guidelines would give the Heritage Minister the clout to deny tax credits to projects deemed "offensive" by an independent committee that includes members of the Canadian Audio-Visual Certification Office and the Department of Justice.

Several powerful arts groups say the changes violate the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Yesterday, novelist Susan Swan, chair of the Writers' Union of Canada, pledged to lead her 1,600-strong membership in a protest.

"We're not going to sit back and accept this," vowed Ms. Swan, author of books such as The Wives of Bath and The Biggest Modern Woman in the World. "We don't like being told what kind of art we can make by the federal government."

Mr. Cronenberg, whose most recent film was the Oscar-nominated Russian mob thriller Eastern Promises, called the move an assault on the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

"The irony is that it is the Canadian films that have given us an international reputation [that] would be most at risk because they are the edgy, relatively low-budget films made by people like me and others that will be targeted by this panel," he said.

"The platform they're suggesting is akin to a Communist Chinese panel of unknown people, who, behind closed doors, will make a second ruling after bodies like Telefilm Canada have already invested."

CONTROVERSIAL FILMS COULD BE THE LOSERS

Films with controversial subject matter, such as Lynne Stopkewich's acclaimed necrophilia film Kissed and Atom Egoyan's Where The Truth Lies (which got an NC-17 rating in the United States for a scene involving a threesome) could lose the right to tax credits under new public policy guidelines.

Works by Martin Gero, the director of Young People Fucking (which opens in theatres in Canada in April), could also get a once-over from the panel.

"It seems ill-conceived from beginning to end, and is less about censorship than destroying the economic foundation of our entire industry," said Mr. Gero, who shot his debut feature film for $1.5-million with support from Telefilm and other government agencies. "It's old people fucking with the Canadian film industry."

Staff
 
A well-known evangelical crusader is claiming credit for the federal government's move to deny tax credits to TV and film productions that contain graphic sex and violence or other offensive content.

ever read the bible?
 
It was only a matter of time before Stephen & Co started inflincting their morality on us. I'm just surprised its taken so long.
I'd rather have leadership and morality, than immoral leadership. It's up to the voters to decide if they like and accept the type of morals the Conservatives support.

As for myself, I'm quite pleased that my tax dollars won't go towards media promoting promoting homosexuality, graphic sex or violence. Not that I care that much about homosexuality, but the day my kids bring home a copy of My Two Dads might lead to some moral debate to myself.

Again, if you don't like what the PM and his party are doing don't vote for the Conservatives. We can expect a Conservative government to have conservative morals, conservative economic principles, conservative thinking in general. Of course, if you vote for the Liberals you're voting for the Conservatives, since there seems to be nothing the Conservatives can do that the Liberals won't support.

My favourite Harper quote of the week:

"When he (Dion) comes and makes ferocious attacks on a budget he has every intention to allow to pass, he simply has no credibility in those attacks,"

Dion is such a loser. Chretien would have eaten Harper for lunch by now, as would have Trudeau or even freak'n John Turner, but this loser Dion can't beat Harper on any issue.
 
I'd rather have leadership and morality, than immoral leadership.

Interesting, it seems immoral leadership is exactly we've been getting from Harper, then ex-leader of the opposition. Not to mention leadership in the form of passing the buck and blaming others for one's own errors?

How ironic (and indeed, hypocritical) that both north and south of the border, those who propound their standards of morality should be the norm for all seems to be leading lives and policies most severely lacking of such.

This is about Harper, not Stephane Dion.

AoD
 
i'm sick of my tax dollars going to public religious schools, tax credits for private religious schools and i'm also sick of the tax free status of churches.
 
So you don't approve of a Canadian movie industry that portrays life?
Whose life? Certainly not mine, no violence, extra-marital sex or sodomy in my life, and I'd rather not support promoting it with my tax dollars. Again, that's just my opinion, so feel free to do whatever floats your boat.

Remember, if you don't like Harper, then don't vote for him. He's just another politician who can be chucked out at the will of the people.
 
This article greatly disturbs me:

Evangelist takes credit for film crackdown
Christian crusader says he pressured cabinet ministers and PMO officials to deny tax credits to productions deemed too offensive
BILL CURRY AND GAYLE MACDONALD
From Friday's Globe and Mail
February 29, 2008 at 4:00 AM EST
OTTAWA, TORONTO — A well-known evangelical crusader is claiming credit for the federal government's move to deny tax credits to TV and film productions that contain graphic sex and violence or other offensive content.

Charles McVety, president of the Canada Family Action Coalition, said his lobbying efforts included discussions with Public Safety Minister Stockwell Day and Justice Minister Rob Nicholson, and "numerous" meetings with officials in the Prime Minister's Office.

"We're thankful that someone's finally listening," he said yesterday. "It's fitting with conservative values, and I think that's why Canadians voted for a Conservative government."

Mr. McVety said films promoting homosexuality, graphic sex or violence should not receive tax dollars, and backbench Conservative MPs and cabinet ministers support his campaign.

Related Articles
Recent
Tories plan to withhold funding for 'offensive' productions
Internet Links
Full coverage: The 2008 Conservative budget
Interactive: The Budget 2008: The priorities
Interactive: Highlights

"There are a number of Conservative backbench members that do a lot of this work behind the scenes," he said.

Mr. Day and Mr. Nicholson said through officials yesterday they did not recall discussing the issue with Mr. McVety.

Canadian Heritage officials confirmed yesterday they will be "expanding slightly" the criteria used for denying tax credits to include grounds such as gratuitous violence, significant sexual content that lacks an educational purpose, or denigration of an identifiable group. More details are promised next week.

Arts groups say they will fight the change. Director David Cronenberg and other big industry names warned that the edgy, low-budget films that have garnered Canadians international acclaim will be at risk.

Conservatives deny that the changes are driven by politics or Mr. McVety, noting the previous Liberal government pledged to review the guidelines as far back as 2003.

Conservative MP Dave Batters recently urged the new president of Telefilm Canada, Michel Roy, to block federal funding for objectionable films, listing Young People Fucking as a recent example.

"In my mind, sir, and in the minds of many of my colleagues and many, many Canadians," said Mr. Batters during a Jan. 31 meeting of the Canadian Heritage committee, "the purpose of Telefilm is to help facilitate the making of films for mainstream Canadian society - films that Canadians can sit down and watch with their families in living rooms across this great country."

In addition to the tax credits for labour costs, Telefilm is a second source of revenue for Canadian film producers. Mr. Roy pledged to raise the issue with the Telefilm board, but a spokesman said yesterday that no policy changes have been made.

Mr. Batters said yesterday he does not support censorship, but offensive films should be made with private money.

"If there's a market for that, let people pay the $11," he said.

Draft guidelines would give the Heritage Minister the clout to deny tax credits to projects deemed "offensive" by an independent committee that includes members of the Canadian Audio-Visual Certification Office and the Department of Justice.

Several powerful arts groups say the changes violate the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Yesterday, novelist Susan Swan, chair of the Writers' Union of Canada, pledged to lead her 1,600-strong membership in a protest.

"We're not going to sit back and accept this," vowed Ms. Swan, author of books such as The Wives of Bath and The Biggest Modern Woman in the World. "We don't like being told what kind of art we can make by the federal government."

Mr. Cronenberg, whose most recent film was the Oscar-nominated Russian mob thriller Eastern Promises, called the move an assault on the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

"The irony is that it is the Canadian films that have given us an international reputation [that] would be most at risk because they are the edgy, relatively low-budget films made by people like me and others that will be targeted by this panel," he said.

"The platform they're suggesting is akin to a Communist Chinese panel of unknown people, who, behind closed doors, will make a second ruling after bodies like Telefilm Canada have already invested."

CONTROVERSIAL FILMS COULD BE THE LOSERS

Films with controversial subject matter, such as Lynne Stopkewich's acclaimed necrophilia film Kissed and Atom Egoyan's Where The Truth Lies (which got an NC-17 rating in the United States for a scene involving a threesome) could lose the right to tax credits under new public policy guidelines.

Works by Martin Gero, the director of Young People Fucking (which opens in theatres in Canada in April), could also get a once-over from the panel.

"It seems ill-conceived from beginning to end, and is less about censorship than destroying the economic foundation of our entire industry," said Mr. Gero, who shot his debut feature film for $1.5-million with support from Telefilm and other government agencies. "It's old people fucking with the Canadian film industry."

Staff
 
I love this part...

"We're not going to sit back and accept this," vowed Ms. Swan, author of books such as The Wives of Bath and The Biggest Modern Woman in the World. "We don't like being told what kind of art we can make by the federal government."
Stupid woman. No one is telling her what kind of art they can make, make whatever you want. What the feds are saying is what kind of art they will give our tax dollars to support.

IMO, the government should not be in the business of financially supporting films, authors, arts, etc. If no one wants to pay full value to see Canadian movies, then let them die. Our musicians seem to understand that they must succeed without public subsidies, do Celine, Shania, Nelly Furtado, Avril, etc. ask for tax dollars? No...they go out there and become not Canadian success stories, but global success stories.
 
Disgusting, as they are using a loophole to expand the existing law that is meant to stop funding for films that may be racist or hateful in nature.

Mr. McVety said films promoting homosexuality, graphic sex or violence should not receive tax dollars, and backbench Conservative MPs and cabinet ministers support his campaign

So what we get is a moron who uses the rules to promote his own massive case of ignorance and prejudice by suggesting that films which somehow promote a supposed homosexual lifestyle (in his opinion) should go unfunded. Will there ever be a day when these idiots wake up and realize that homosexuality is not some off-the-shelf statement of a lifestyle, but a way that a person is born?

Conservative MP Dave Batters recently urged the new president of Telefilm Canada, Michel Roy, to block federal funding for objectionable films, listing Young People Fucking as a recent example.

I've sent Dave Batters an email informing him that stopping such a film won't prevent young people from doing what the title describes.
 
I love this part...

Stupid woman. No one is telling her what kind of art they can make, make whatever you want. What the feds are saying is what kind of art they will give our tax dollars to support.

IMO, the government should not be in the business of financially supporting films, authors, arts, etc. If no one wants to pay full value to see Canadian movies, then let them die. Our musicians seem to understand that they must succeed without public subsidies, do Celine, Shania, Nelly Furtado, Avril, etc. ask for tax dollars? No...they go out there and become not Canadian success stories, but global success stories.

They are subsidized through CanCon regulations. Without them, their careers would be significantly less successful.
 

Back
Top