News   Jun 14, 2024
 1.9K     1 
News   Jun 14, 2024
 1.4K     1 
News   Jun 14, 2024
 781     0 

GO Transit: Service thread (including extensions)

I would also think the Bloor station on the Barrie Line should be pushed north 100m to extend over the bridge, so it can reduce the transfer distance to the Bloor subway. There seems to be strong resistance to stations that span over top of roads, but ultimately that's where the connections need to be. These stations need to stop being put in the "easiest" place, and need to be put in the "correct" place.
Not only is a station south of the bridge easier, but it means the track grade can begin more immediately at the north end. The bridge is designed for a purpose and it may not be engineered sufficiently for the regular slow-stop-start of station operations. It sucks that there will not be a short-convenient route to Lansdowne, but at least they didn't give up on the idea entirely.
 
Peak-only Micro-transit service for ~1-5 km of many high ridership GO stations.

http://www.metrolinx.com/en/docs/pd...61208_BoardMtg_RER_Station_Access_Plan_EN.pdf

Which Micro-transit is Metrolinx speaking of?
Typically, based on precedent in other cities, it is like shuttle buses.
Like an airport shuttle for park-n-ride lots or rentals.

Could be as big as a GO bus, or as small as a rideshare vehicle or the same size as a typical shuttle bus. One thaf runs a "bus route" adjacent to the GO station, probably visiting several major intersections where people disembark bus/transit routes that don't come directly to the GO station.
 
Typically, based on precedent in other cities, it is like shuttle buses.
Like an airport shuttle for park-n-ride lots or rentals.

Could be as big as a GO bus, or as small as a rideshare vehicle or the same size as a typical shuttle bus. One thaf runs a "bus route" adjacent to the GO station, probably visiting several major intersections where people disembark bus/transit routes that don't come directly to the GO station.
Suspicious as I am, I wonder about Uber inspiration of that item.
 
Suspicious as I am, I wonder about Uber inspiration of that item.
Probably.

GO DIAL-A-BUS II Reborn, The Sequel.

For readers not aware, GO one-upped Uber in the 1970s with GO Transit DIAL-A-BUS, an early UberPOOL equivalent from 1973-1976. It behaved like a UberPOOL, except you called in by landline or payphone. And CB radios at the call centre dispatched the nearest short bus to deviate from its route to pick you up on its way at your location, to bring a pool of people towards a transit node such as a TTC station.

go-dial-a-bus-03.jpg


Just today, it's an easier app button press (homes onto your current GPS location) so you don't need to speak to anyone. And automated back ends that automatically dispatches without a call-centre. Instead of expensive staffing-heavy 1970s call centres and CB radios dispatching a fleet of shuttlebuses. Today, it's much more practical (and getting increasingly cheaper) to deploy ride-share systems thanks to widespread use of smartphones & automated dispatching.

Micro transit definitely can cover pooled ride hail services. It could also be a hybrid -- a loose route -- a fleet of vans and shuttle buses running a loop visiting transit nodes -- that is allowed to deviate to pick up app ride-hails within a small radius. It would be designed to handle perhaps, a 3 kilometer rectangle around the GO station, enough to cover lots of connecting bus routes & also handle ride hailing too.

I imagine an open RFQ / bidding could occur. In fact, UberPOOL could be allowed to "bid" as the microtransit service of choice -- basically, a minimum of commissioned permanent UberPOOL vehicles (GO-hired drivers) to ensure minimum capacity so that it can be marketed as part of GO materials, etc -- but also permitting additional (approved drivers, even you, but slightly more rigorous process as required by the RFP / RFQ) to "join in" on the fun. Or another vendor (other than UberPOOL) might be approved as the microtransit of choice.

There seems to be precedents forming already in this world, where select pre-existing ride hail services are being chosen by public transit agencies, as integrated first/last mile connectors now.

Uber/Lyft/etc is already built into Google Maps app (the new ridehail icon next to the car/transit/bike icon) and things like Transit App which is the official TTC app integrated into ttc.ca ... So unavoidably, you're only one or two degrees away from using a ridehail service from a transit agency's integrated map/widget, and the next step is to sanction/fare-integrate a pooled ride hail service once they meet the criteria (liability/safety/etc) required such by the transit agency.

Then when that happens -- you now only need to press a button in, say, Google Maps, to automatically add a fare-integrated rideshare pool (UberPOOL, etc) to the beginning of your public transit journey, etc. Things like that -- we're already headed in that direction...

It's very cost-effective for suburban settings in situations where there is low-density and large fixed-route buses are potentially far more expensive than the 100% subsidized cost of even providing free (fare-integrated) rideshare carpool service as an incentive. Done properly with several passengers per vehicle, operating cost could potentially be low enough to be fully fare integrated, or a very small co-pay -- and still cost less taxpayer money per passenger than adding/modifying a bus route to gain the same passenger increase -- while being much more convenient (door-to-door first/last mile service).

The cost of a UberPOOL actually is less than a GO train trip, and that's what riders like me pay -- and that says nothing of the wholesale cost that a GO-transit-hired pool driver (e.g. essentially a chartered UberPOOL for a specific station's microtransit) -- now with a shorter microtransit-type pool with enough ridership -- it may fall to under a dollar taxpayer operating subsidy per rider in certain cases -- low enough to fare-integrate.

It could come in many forms. If Uber wins the bid, they could call it "UberGO", and the specific micro transit choices would be "UberGO Aurora" and "UberGO Richmond Hill". It'd show up everywhere, TransitApp (as a choice), Google Map (as a choice), Apple Maps, Bing Maps, as a "transit route choice". They'd show up as choices if you are originating anywhere near that specific station. Tap on it and you've begun your fare-integrated journey as they come to pick you up, the UberGO ride automatically becomes free or lower-price (low one-dollar or two-dollar co-pay) one you tap your Presto onto the GO Train.

We're technologically nearly there; it's just not fare-integrated yet, and still three or four button taps. All it will take is some municipal/provincial agreements, and the rideshare leg could show up inside the Transit tab (as a fare-integrated rideshare hop for the first/last miles on a "Transit Directions" route) instead of the new Rideshare tab of Google Map.

Even if that does not happen, the market will possibly solve the problem for GO Transit soon. As one example, see the Google Map example -- with the right stuff (and agreements in place with a winning pooled rideshare bid), it could become part of the official GO-branded service. One button press on your smartphone -- and a fare-integrated rideshare pool service (as the micro transit) immediately drives to your your current GPS position -- to pick you up to drive you to the GO station. All at hopefully relatively low taxpayer cost.

Essentially -- bringing back a modern equivalent of yesterday's GO DIAL-A-BUS service
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: rbt
It's nice to see the Stouffville Line finally getting another train in each direction. I know the track twinning is ongoing in support of all-day service, but these trains will really help passengers now, especially if the evening trip is after 20:00 (the buses at that hour are horrendously packed).

GO rail service changes this winter (2016/17) include the extension of five morning peak and five afternoon peak Richmond Hill line trips from Richmond Hill to Gormley Station. The Stouffville line will see one new morning and one new evening peak trip with adjustments to other existing services. The Barrie line will see the introduction of weekend service between Aurora and Union Station, with some trips to/from Allendale GO Station, operating 19 all-stop trips each day.

Source: http://www.metrolinx.com/en/docs/pdf/board_agenda/20161208/20161208_BoardMtg_PP_Report_EN.pdf
 
It's nice to see the Stouffville Line finally getting another train in each direction. I know the track twinning is ongoing in support of all-day service, but these trains will really help passengers now, especially if the evening trip is after 20:00 (the buses at that hour are horrendously packed).

No plans for an evening trip, at least not yet. The southbound trip will be scheduled for a half-hour after the current last train south from Lincolnville (with the Unionville "flip" departing a half-hour later from its current time). The new northbound trip is scheduled for a 17.45 departure from Union Station, with the subsequent trips being pushed back 10 and 5 minutes respectively.

Dan
Toronto, Ont.
 
No plans for an evening trip, at least not yet. The southbound trip will be scheduled for a half-hour after the current last train south from Lincolnville (with the Unionville "flip" departing a half-hour later from its current time). The new northbound trip is scheduled for a 17.45 departure from Union Station, with the subsequent trips being pushed back 10 and 5 minutes respectively.

Dan
Toronto, Ont.

Thanks, Dan! That's still a huge improvement.
 
It's great to expand service but how exactly are they paying for the operations of these expansion? The new APTA statistics for the second quarter of 2016 have been released and year over year rail ridership is up 2.75%. Considering that the GO rail service area's population is growing at about 2% a year { Ontario as a whole grew by 1.3% in the 12 months} and they have rolled out huge increases in service & frequencies, how exactly are they affording this?

Any answers? All I hear about is infrastructure expansion and frequencies but nothing about how they will pay the enormous operational costs.
 
Any answers? All I hear about is infrastructure expansion and frequencies but nothing about how they will pay the enormous operational costs.

They can't add the cost to their operating budgets until the lines open. TYSSE is the most imminent. There has been lots of attention paid in the media to that line item being added to future years' TTC budget, given that TTC is struggling to cover its existing costs. GO is more obtuse about how much specific service additions will add to their budget.

- Paul
 
You would think this would be GO's first concern as certainly the per-person cost for the mid-day/evening service will be more expensive to run than the rush-hour service.
 
You would think this would be GO's first concern as certainly the per-person cost for the mid-day/evening service will be more expensive to run than the rush-hour service.

After they have invested hundreds of millions in track and signalling for the peak period, running trains in off peak is pretty cheap. It may take a few years to build ridership to a solid level, but the amount spent in underutilized trains isn't bone crushing. It would be a bigger waste of money to invest in the lines and then leave them idle off peak.

- Paul
 
You would think this would be GO's first concern as certainly the per-person cost for the mid-day/evening service will be more expensive to run than the rush-hour service.

Metrolinx knows what the province will give it next year already.

It simply isn't public yet.

There are back channel discussions all the time about service (ahem, political) objectives and what they will cost.

But if that were made public all in advance, there'd be one photo-op max. LOL
 

Back
Top