News   Jan 08, 2026
 470     0 
News   Jan 08, 2026
 843     1 
News   Jan 08, 2026
 493     0 

GO Transit Fleet Equipment and other

Screenshot_20260104-193452_Facebook.jpg
 
Look at the TTC screens? They said "welcome abroad" for over 2 years. Even when we buy nice stuff we don't make use of it for some reason
It's probably because the buses were ordered with the screens and they arrived before the whole system was rolled out throughout the system.

Not everything happens in the order that you want it to.
 
Wond

Wonder why they're gutted if they retired the fleet?

If I remember right since they came from CA they have to be updated to THEIR emissions standard even though it's operating here?

They don't want their used equipment that pollutes the air to be used elsewhere in the world.

They don't understand that any form of public transportation is better than people driving cars.
 
Gutted? Then what's the point of buying them?
GO is getting their hands on as many F59PH and F59PHIs as possible so they have “donor locomotives” to gut further in an attempt to make a few working “Frankenstein” locos that run. Yes, my understanding is that all the prime movers have holes drilled in them, so likely they will require new ones. Good luck ONTC!
 
Procurement of replacement EMD 12-710 prime movers is still a very easy task. Some of the other hardware may be custom built for the F59 locomotive, but that really should not be a problem for an experienced shop like North Bay.
Those California units were clapped out and likely in need of a general overhaul anyways. Pulling the prime movers and replacing them is not anhardship. The carbodies and frames are what is of value.
(Only a few years ago, CPKC built a large number of 12-710 Eco's on the frames of ancient GP9's... those ECO's are actually not that different than a rebuilt F59)
In a perfect world, ML would have been able to procure additional MP40s or MP54s.... but since those aren't available, adding more F59's at a time when 2WAD may demand shorter consists anyway seems pretty reasonable. Known units of proven worth that match the existing remaining GO F59s....perhaps ML regrets having shed so many in earlier years....many are still out there in one form or another.

- Paul
 
Procurement of replacement EMD 12-710 prime movers is still a very easy task. Some of the other hardware may be custom built for the F59 locomotive, but that really should not be a problem for an experienced shop like North Bay.
Those California units were clapped out and likely in need of a general overhaul anyways. Pulling the prime movers and replacing them is not anhardship. The carbodies and frames are what is of value.
(Only a few years ago, CPKC built a large number of 12-710 Eco's on the frames of ancient GP9's... those ECO's are actually not that different than a rebuilt F59)
In a perfect world, ML would have been able to procure additional MP40s or MP54s.... but since those aren't available, adding more F59's at a time when 2WAD may demand shorter consists anyway seems pretty reasonable. Known units of proven worth that match the existing remaining GO F59s....perhaps ML regrets having shed so many in earlier years....many are still out there in one form or another.

- Paul
Didn't someone say that they will be putting new Cummins motors in there?
 
Procurement of replacement EMD 12-710 prime movers is still a very easy task. Some of the other hardware may be custom built for the F59 locomotive, but that really should not be a problem for an experienced shop like North Bay.
Those California units were clapped out and likely in need of a general overhaul anyways. Pulling the prime movers and replacing them is not anhardship. The carbodies and frames are what is of value.
(Only a few years ago, CPKC built a large number of 12-710 Eco's on the frames of ancient GP9's... those ECO's are actually not that different than a rebuilt F59)
In a perfect world, ML would have been able to procure additional MP40s or MP54s.... but since those aren't available, adding more F59's at a time when 2WAD may demand shorter consists anyway seems pretty reasonable. Known units of proven worth that match the existing remaining GO F59s....perhaps ML regrets having shed so many in earlier years....many are still out there in one form or another.

- Paul
It’s funny that when the did a mass sell off decades ago it was the newest units getting the chop
 
Didn't someone say that they will be putting new Cummins motors in there?
I speculated about putting in ex MP40 QSK60s plus a HEP engine, but that was on the premise of moving forward with a battery pilot on the donors, and as @smallspy noted the mount points would have to work too

Will be interesting how many good locos come from all these Metrolink units - almost looks like they are collecting Pokémon on this point.
 
I speculated about putting in ex MP40 QSK60s plus a HEP engine, but that was on the premise of moving forward with a battery pilot on the donors, and as @smallspy noted the mount points would have to work too

Will be interesting how many good locos come from all these Metrolink units - almost looks like they are collecting Pokémon on this point.
I donno if that would fit the cowl unit body.
You don't need 4000hp. 3000 is enough for L10 consist. Leave the L12 for the bigger locomotives.
 
To be clear I was only suggesting 1 QSK each (2700hp) so for L6s
What about HEP? Run HEP off the prime mover?

If an F40PH and a GP 40 have 3000hp what makes the F59 superior with the same HP? They should all be able to run L10 consist? Why replace them with newer locomotives with the same HP?
 

Back
Top