denfromoakvillemilton
Senior Member
Member Bio
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2008
- Messages
- 7,646
- Reaction score
- 1,729
- Location
- Downtown Toronto, Ontario
Didn't know this, thanks.They absolutely can expand service. For an hourly service to Kitchener, the next train meet to the east of Georgetown would occur at Malton station, which also happens to be where the current hourly service meets. So outside of peak periods, GO only needs a single track through the largely 3-track CN corridor. The lack of 3rd track at Brampton station simply means that CN has a short segment of single-track operation if they happen to arrive while GO is occupying the second track.
View attachment 356008
Until a flyover is built, the options for an hourly service west of Georgetown are: meet on the GO line and disrupt CN traffic twice per hour, or meet on the CN line while crossing CN traffic, which only disrupts CN once per hour.
Kitchener Expansion BCA 2021, page 19:
View attachment 356009
I would have thought that resolving the signalling through the platform would provide sufficient schedule padding for the meet to occur at the platform of Georgetown station. Guelph-Acton and Acton-Georgetown are both scheduled for 15 minutes, but Guelph-Acton is 21 km (84 km/h avg) while Acton-Georgetown is only 10 km (40 km/h avg). I figured that a big part of that discrepency is the current slowdown in Georgetown.
During peak periods there would also be an intermediate meet at Acton between the hourly counter-peak service and the extra peak-period services which increase the peak-period headway to 30 minutes. But I figure that a couple extra minutes of padding could be freed up for that additional meet by having those extra peak-direction runs skip Acton station - thereby cutting their travel time by 2 minutes.
It looks like it would be quite difficult to get a fourth track through Silver Junction, so unless they were referring to the future passing track at Acton station, a passing point west of Georgetown would presumably be a standalone passing siding, which would be disappointing since passing places between stations tend to produce more delay than passing tracks at stations where trains need to cross anyway. If the travel time is still too long then I'd prefer that they extend the double track east from Guelph Station. Surely adding a second span to that bridge is affordable - it should cost less than the current work they're doing to replace spans and crossbeams.
So why all this hand wringing over Bramalea/Brampton and track space then?




