News   Dec 10, 2025
 1.5K     1 
News   Dec 10, 2025
 778     4 
News   Dec 10, 2025
 1.9K     2 

GO Transit: Construction Projects (Metrolinx, various)


It is an inference from the DoFo letter, which talks about the freight rail bypass "missing link" along with the wording of "potential to unlock new GO lines".

Of course it wasn't explicitly mentioned in the letter, but it's reasonable to assume the midtown line would be one of these potential new lines unlocked by the missing link.

Replied to this thought in the bypass thread, won't repost it here.

The midtown line may be enabled by the bypass, in some future decade, but it isn't really an immediate deliverable of the current direction.

- Paul
 
Of course it wasn't explicitly mentioned in the letter, but it's reasonable to assume the midtown line would be one of these potential new lines unlocked by the missing link.
I'd assume it's more a reference to the various other CP lines and old ROWs that radiate out of TO. Oshawa, Peterborough, Vaughan, Orangeville, etc.

I don't think the proposed link from Bramalea to Milton would do anything more than allow for capacity expansion on the Kitchener line.
 
Exactly this.

We can look to MTO's 2051 GGH transportation plan for inspiration:

View attachment 624318

I Imagine we would see:

1. Milton Electrification
2. Toronto Northern GO route - a new commuter rail / metro route from Hamilton to Oshawa via North Oakville, Mississauga, Pearson, Vaughan, Richmond Hill, Markham, Seaton, and Brooklyn
3. GO RER extension to Downtown Hamilton GO
4. GO RER Extension to Kitchener

View attachment 624319

Other potentials which aren't identified in the GGH 2051 TMP:
1. GO Midtown Line
2. Bolton GO line
3. Brantford GO service (connections to Downtown Hamilton?)
4. Niagara RER
5. Uxbridge GO extension
6.Guelph - Cambridge GO
7. GO RER to Bowmanville
8. London GO service
Is this green line from Hamilton to Oshawa feasible off existing rail lines?
 
The notional freight rail bypass would parallel Hwy 407. Conceivably, there could be a Metrolinx ROW included in that new rail corridor?
 
Eastbound:

IMG_8329.jpeg
IMG_8330.jpeg
IMG_8331.jpeg
IMG_8332.jpeg
IMG_8333.jpeg
IMG_8334.jpeg
IMG_8335.jpeg
IMG_8336.jpeg
IMG_8337.jpeg
IMG_8338.jpeg
IMG_8339.jpeg
IMG_8340.jpeg
IMG_8341.jpeg
IMG_8342.jpeg
IMG_8343.jpeg
 
I don't know if it's true or not, but I read in another forum that the ONexpress contract transition handover has been delayed by either 6 or 10 months. If that is the case, isn't the timing of this GO 2.0 announcement a little fishy? Sounds to me like they're trying to cover up that GO 1.0 is behind schedule.
 
I don't know if it's true or not, but I read in another forum that the ONexpress contract transition handover has been delayed by either 6 or 10 months

That is true.

The transition has been delayed to early October, 2025.
 
Ah ok, I just find it strange how the story hasn't been covered by any local media yet, unless it's because people are still coming back from the holidays.

The media bury/sit-on a lot of stories they are aware of; while in some cases they are just obtuse.

Perhaps you should post about the issue on social and tag a media outlet or their Transportation reporter, if they have one, and ask when they were thinking of covering it.
 
Jan 18
More up on my site

Warden Ave 4th Lakeshore East Line Track Bridge
54277231712_6da2109808_b.jpg

54277231702_b1ba95fd2b_b.jpg

54278111561_a169f136d0_b.jpg


Danforth Ave 4th Lakeshore East Line Track Bridge
54278357334_c3618611c6_b.jpg

54278543195_ed6c6b6cc5_b.jpg

54277231762_acb9205015_b.jpg
 

Back
Top