GenerationW
Senior Member
I'll bet you $100 it won't happen, and I'll even give you 2013 + five years (i.e. by 2018).Hahaha It will happen.......Money talks, BS walks, and it sure wont be a dream.
I'll bet you $100 it won't happen, and I'll even give you 2013 + five years (i.e. by 2018).Hahaha It will happen.......Money talks, BS walks, and it sure wont be a dream.
That's why the NFL never plays games in Toronto, because we don't have a 60,000 seat stadium.Show me where and how Toronto will build a 60,000 seat stadium, and I'll start going along with your dreams.
That's why the NFL never plays games in Toronto, because we don't have a 60,000 seat stadium.
Oh wait ... hang on, perhaps one could play in a 50,000 seat stadium instead and add 20% to the ticket prices? Quick, someone tell the NFL, and we might start seeing the occasional game here!
I just don't see how one could ever justify a new larger stadium for a sport where there'd only be 8 or 9 games a year, when you can simply increase ticket prices by 50% and use an existing facility. I expect they'd sell in Toronto - I'd think there'd be far more interest in a local team, than two foreign teams, and tickets would be in more demand.
If we were further south, perhaps a new stadium would make sense ... but look at when the regular season runs for NFL. mid-September into early January. Would you prefer to be in a 80,000 seat uncovered stadium, or a 55,000 covered, heated, stadium.
That's why the NFL never plays games in Toronto, because we don't have a 60,000 seat stadium.
Oh wait ... hang on, perhaps one could play in a 50,000 seat stadium instead and add 20% to the ticket prices? Quick, someone tell the NFL, and we might start seeing the occasional game here!
I fail to see why Baseball and Football, who pushed for the damn stadium in the first place, agreed to the design then. That stadium cost us taxpayers a fortune, so they are going to have to live with it for another few decades yet. It's not like that it was a repurposed athletic stadium like the Big O.The Skydome is a terrible baseball stadium, and an even worse football stadium.
All multipurpose stadiums are compromises, and much worse than purpose-built stadiums. Given that no one was going to build two separate covered stadiums, the Skydome was the best that could be hoped for -- it was a sub-optimal solution, but the only one that was practical.I fail to see why Baseball and Football, who pushed for the damn stadium in the first place, agreed to the design then.
I just don't think it's as easy as increasing ticket prices to make up for the lost revenue. The average ticket price in the nfl is $76. Let's say you add 50% to that, you're looking at $114 which would almost put them at the top of the league (behing the Patriots). Multiply that amount by 54,000 seats and by 8 games and you get just under $50million. TV contracts currently give each team $118million, so you're looking at $168million in revenue. We know that the Green Bay Packers had an annual operating cost of $160million last year. So you're looking at a profit margin of around $8million for a Toronto team. Considering you're talking about a minimum billion dollar investment to get a team here, that type of profit isn't all that great, especially when you consider you've maxed out the ticket revenue you can earn since you're already charging the most expensive ticket in the league and you're in a market where the loonie can be the difference between making a profit and losing money. Additionally, we don't know how a Toronto team would impact the US tv contracts and whether Toronto would reap the same benefits as the US based teams.
Of course, it's not that simple, and there are other ways to generate bits of revenue, but equally, there may be other costs involved as well. I just don't think it's a smart business move to put a team in the Dome long term. There just isn't enough incentive for an owner to do it and there's a lot of risk there.
Your right in one sense......the NFL (any league) is foolish to focus on capacity instead of revenue generation. The Bills earn about 1.5 - 2X (from what I heard) on the games in Toronto relative to what they earn on any match at the Ralph.
That said, it is highly unlikely that Toronto (or any market) could sustain for a full season the sort of average ticket prices that are imposed to be able to pay the Bills that money from that small 52k stadium we have.
Long term, I think the number is somewhere between 70k and 75k of seats that Toronto would need in a new stadium if it were for the NFL.....I just don't know that it has to be in an $1B (ish) dome configuration....I also don't know who would own it now that the 3 likely suspects have (I believe) rendered themselves outside of NFL ownership rules by partnering together and owning teams in (multiple) other leagues.
confused.....wouldn't it only be a billion dollar investment if you did build a new stadium? Surely it would not be a billion dollars to either get an expansion team or purchase and move an existing team?
Well Toronto only gets a team doing one of two things and both involves outbidding others. When Buffalo (or let's say Jacksonville or San Diego) goes up for sale, you're looking at an auction with the highest bidder winning. The Bills are worth around $800million right now (Jax is worth $725m and SD is worth $920m) so it wouldn't be crazy to see a billion dollar bid needed to get a the team. The other way is through expansion (which is doubtful) and only 10 years ago the expansion fee for Houston was $700million. The NFL could ask for much more that that if it wanted to.