SaugeenJunction
Senior Member
Exactly. I‘m sure they will be fine for both Finch and Hurontario.The trains are used for the correct purpose in the case of line 6 - light rail, instead of a light metro.
Exactly. I‘m sure they will be fine for both Finch and Hurontario.The trains are used for the correct purpose in the case of line 6 - light rail, instead of a light metro.
We will see when the start operating on Finch.MX ordered the citadis spirit trains as well...could this be a problem for this line?
Unfortunately that video seems to have been filmed a while ago, note the lack of leaves on tress.
Here’s a great Twitter thread which includes some more recent photos.
Except running tram trains every 3-4 minutes under CBTC on such a tight alignment and with high top speeds is indeed quite unconventionalThe way the CBC breathlessly reported "pushing the limits" to me showed that there was a lot of smoke and little fire around this issue at the Ottawa enquiry, and not much real understanding of the technology. It amounts to stringing two - TWO! - four-section vehicles into a train and running them down a fully segregated track. So ground-breaking, no wonder there were problems. If there were design or build problems, or incompatibilities with the track, that has little to do with the basic conception of the system.
Running a high floor 'tram' vehicle like a metro isn't new as this is what stadtbahns do. However running a low floor tram as a metro (in Canada) is new. I'd shift the blame on the O train's performance more on poor maintenance/weather but that is another story . .Except running tram trains every 3-4 minutes under CBTC on such a tight alignment and with high top speeds is indeed quite unconventional
do we know what the service levels will be for finch west? we still dont know for eglinton tooExcept running tram trains every 3-4 minutes under CBTC on such a tight alignment and with high top speeds is indeed quite unconventional
Agreed, sticking with low floor was the biggest error. I would love to hear the inside story of the arguments that must have taken place.Running a high floor 'tram' vehicle like a metro isn't new as this is what stadtbahns do. However running a low floor tram as a metro (in Canada) is new. I'd shift the blame on the O train's performance more on poor maintenance/weather but that is another story . .
do we know what the service levels will be for finch west? we still dont know for eglinton too
You seem to miss a bunch of the details here! The Ottawa trains are bigger than almost all German Stadtbahn trains, and 100% low floor (a decent number in Germany aren't) and need to be able to operate at high speeds so the design is less conventional. Stadtbahns also are almost never structured the way O Train Line 1 is. They have numerous branches pushing trains into a shorter central bit, that gives you a lot more flexibility than a single path (i.e. Metro) style of service.Running a high floor 'tram' vehicle like a metro isn't new as this is what stadtbahns do. However running a low floor tram as a metro (in Canada) is new. I'd shift the blame on the O train's performance more on poor maintenance/weather but that is another story . .
There was a study released about this linked here: https://app06.ottawa.ca/calendar/ot...009/11-18/04-Rail System Study Document 1.pdfAgreed, sticking with low floor was the biggest error. I would love to hear the inside story of the arguments that must have taken place.