thecharioteer
Senior Member
Adam Vaughan indicated the fountain was damaged by a car crash. Apparently the stone is rare enough that it takes a couple of years to replace.
If this fountain was privately owned (say at Commerce Court) would any reputable landlord leave a site in disarray for years while he searched for replacement stone? Would he not consider refacing the entire ensemble in an alternate available material if the original material was unavailable? Why do we accept such feeble excuses when it's something owned by the City (i.e.us)?