EnviroTO
Senior Member
I don't know how you can say it is fine. A jogger with a walk sign could easily run into the intersection without a driver that is turning seeing him.
you sure those are tags? could be construction related, temporary paint?
I don't know how you can say it is fine. A jogger with a walk sign could easily run into the intersection without a driver that is turning seeing him.
But I'm sure there will be a no right on red because they like to babysit us and have no concept of what makes better traffic flow.
you can say that about any intersection.
Doesn't take away the fact that visability is good at queen and dufferin.
Roads are for cars. Sidewalks are for people. The car is not driving on the side walk. Turning on red lights has nothing to do with making a better neighbourhood. Id rather the cars get out of my neighbourhood faster then to be all conjested and adding extra noise and emmisions to the air. Plus as a resident of that neighbourhood I also drive in the neighbourhood. I prefer my area I drive in to not be gridlock, that's just me though. I probably walk more then I drive though and guess what? I've never been hit by a car turning right on a red. Common sense FTW.For me intersections should be planned not just on what makes for better traffic flow, but for what makes a better neighbourhood. I really wish Torontonians would realize our streets are not just thoroughfares for cars. We've got a lot of growing up to do.
That big steel girder right up against the thin sidewalk looks hard to see through to me.
^
I didn't know that Rob Ford posted here.
I'm Rob Ford because I think it's stupid eliminating right hand turns on red? I get it, you're anti-car. We should just turn all the roads in Toronto into giant sidewalks, bike lanes and the only powered vehicles allowed will be transit. >.>
Roads are for cars.
wrong! roads are for horses and wagons. rails are for cars.