sixrings
Senior Member
They better be able to climb the steep hills, especially between Eglinton and Rogers, as well as at Davenport.
Apparently that won't be a problem with the new lrvs.
They better be able to climb the steep hills, especially between Eglinton and Rogers, as well as at Davenport.
That's what I was thinking.
Dufferin is a great candidate for a streetcar line in mixed traffic. I am probably one of the few who still believe modern streetcars can be more than novelty development tools.
Ultimately there may be a TC underground route for Dufferin.
It would have to be deep, elevated, and/or like the Bloor-Danforth line between Keele and Runnymede, given the number of steep hills between Eglinton and Rogers.Ultimately there may be a TC underground route for Dufferin.
It would have to be deep, elevated, and/or like the Bloor-Danforth line between Keele and Runnymede, given the number of steep hills between Eglinton and Rogers.
There is a valley between Eglinton and Rogers that sinks quite deep. The underground line would have to be rather deep.Underground until at least Eglinton, then it can be in the middle of the road.
There is a valley between Eglinton and Rogers that sinks quite deep. The underground line would have to be rather deep.
All excellent reasons for not even considering itThe line would have to start to slope south of Rogers Rd and resurface north of Castlefield Ave to deal with the rolling hills between Roger Rd and Eglinton Ave. In fact the depth of the tunnel between St Clair Ave and Rogers Rd would have to be deeper than normal to deal with both grade issues south of St Clair Ave and between Roger Rd and Eglinton Ave.
The stations at St Clair, Roger Rd and Eglinton would be very deep than normal. The distance between the Eglinton Crosstown Station and the Dufferin line station would more than the the ones that we have today.
I would say off hand the the Dufferin line would be almost 200 feet below grade between St Clair and Eglinton.
You still have the hill north of Castlefield and maybe the line should surface south of Glencairn in place of Castlefield.
That would be much deeper than York Mills station, the deepest station in Toronto.The line would have to start to slope south of Rogers Rd and resurface north of Castlefield Ave to deal with the rolling hills between Roger Rd and Eglinton Ave. In fact the depth of the tunnel between St Clair Ave and Rogers Rd would have to be deeper than normal to deal with both grade issues south of St Clair Ave and between Roger Rd and Eglinton Ave.
The stations at St Clair, Roger Rd and Eglinton would be very deep than normal. The distance between the Eglinton Crosstown Station and the Dufferin line station would more than the the ones that we have today.
I would say off hand the the Dufferin line would be almost 200 feet below grade between St Clair and Eglinton.
You still have the hill north of Castlefield and maybe the line should surface south of Glencairn in place of Castlefield.
Yes, and I can tell you why it's not going anywhere. It's stuck behind cars turning left, or delivery vans on the right, or stuck with a half dozen of its kin behind a disabled street car in front. That's why.The Streetcar is not going anywhere.
Yes, and I can tell you why it's not going anywhere. It's stuck behind cars turning left, or delivery vans on the right, or stuck with a half dozen of its kin behind a disabled street car in front. That's why.