News   Apr 16, 2024
 359     0 
News   Apr 15, 2024
 1.2K     0 
News   Apr 15, 2024
 2.5K     7 

Cities outside Toronto want better trains into T.O.

wylie:

Actually KW/Guelph does fall under the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, with downtown KW having a minimium density target of 200 residents/jobs/ha and Guelph, 150 residents/jobs/ha by 2031.

AoD
 
Kitchener Waterloo Record editorial on the issue

-----

www.therecord.com/NASApp/...4322320546

Put GO trains on region's track


(Jun 22, 2006)

With the population of Waterloo Region rising rapidly, the need for better transportation services in southern Ontario is only going to increase. A provincial report predicts that the region's population, which was 456,000 in 2001, will increase to 729,000 by the year 2031, which is only 25 years away.

In particular, the need for a better transportation link between the region and Toronto is only going to increase. Given the problems that confront drivers every day on Highway 401, a better link really means a better train service.

Local politicians understand this point in theory. Waterloo regional council and Kitchener council have supported the concept of a better Via rail service to Toronto. Kitchener is involved because it is part of the North Mainline Municipal Alliance. The alliance is concerned with the Via route from London to Toronto. At present, Via Rail operates only three trains a day on the route.

The municipalities cannot be blamed for trying to improve the Via service, but in the long run the real solution lies with the GO train service. GO is responsible for providing a regional service, which is what is needed. The region should be trying to expand the GO service. At present, the GO trains stop at Milton, although GO buses do go to Guelph.

The province recently released a report that said a GO bus service is feasible between Waterloo Region and Mississauga. The report foresees between 800 and 1,200 passengers a day travelling from Cambridge to Mississauga. The full GO-train service has been one of Cambridge Mayor Doug Craig's goals.

At a meeting with The Record's editorial board this week, David Caplan, the minister of public infrastructure renewal, said the province would first consider setting up the GO bus service and would then see whether the number of passengers warranted the full train service.

That may well be the logical way to proceed, but no one should doubt that there is a significant difference between a GO train and a GO bus. Trains are not delayed by heavy traffic on Highway 401 and are less affected by the weather. They are also much more comfortable, enabling passengers to conduct their business while travelling to or from their destination.

Caplan, the minister, fully understands that the province has to plan for the future, otherwise the future will unfold in a haphazard manner. A GO train service for the entire region would be an ideal way of controlling the future, of ensuring the residents of the region can get to the largest metropolitan centre in the country without clogging up Highway 401 more than it already is. The passengers would be awaiting the day the service started.
 
The VIA line from London to Toronto via Kitchener definitely needs upgrades. I don't know why they would bring up Budd cars and connecting to Georgetown when really what is needed is rail corridor upgrades so VIA can run along the line quicker and for VIA to add another run during the day. I agree that anti-VIA sentiment comes stems from the fact it is really a service that only benefits Ontario and Quebec for the most part. Perhaps the provinces in which VIA provides service should split the tab and the federal government should have some matching formula so that any other province which would like improved VIA service can opt in. VIA is really the same as any other form of transit except it is inter-city transit.
 
I wonder if Via is presenting the right level of service to the London - Kitchener - Toronto corridor. If the target rider is primarily a commuter, I imagine that service could be provided that is more utilitarian (like GO service) rather than VIA service, which strikes me as more long distance travel with it's attendants in all the cars and (ocassional) assigned seating (do they do this on this route?).

Perhaps this is service that is better provided by GO, and maybe VIA just needs to have a different set of trains for the more commuter based services that it provides.
 
The problem is that VIA can't provide their service adequately London-Kitchener-Toronto because the tracks and other elements are in poor condition. The route takes 3 hours from London to Toronto. On some segments of the route the VIA trains move along at only 60km/h. There are a lot of business travellers on VIA on the London-Brantford-Toronto route but few would take the London-KW-Toronto route because it is so inconvenient. On the Brantford route there are 6 trains per weekday versus 3 via KW. If they were to leave the number of trains the same and simply get the travel time via KW down to 2 hours VIA would probably increase ridership significantly. KW, Guelph, and even Sarnia are the big loosers in this because they are barely part of VIA's corridor services.
 
There's a stretch in Guelph where the train crawls at 10 MPH - that's the most fustrating part of the route. The track goes through the middle of a street (though is in a "median", but the main reason is that it passes through a freight yard. Proper signalling would shave time here and through Kitchener and Stratford, saving 15-20 minutes or so. CWR (welded rail) throught the whole line would save another 20 minutes at least. At this point, the line becomes much more competitive. It doesn't take a whole lot.
 
Would it make sense to have the Georgetown GO line continue on to Guelph and from there to Kitchener, so that one would be able to travel between any of these cities?

"Actually KW/Guelph does fall under the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, with downtown KW having a minimium density target of 200 residents/jobs/ha and Guelph, 150 residents/jobs/ha by 2031."

And it's a good thing that growth is to be focused in and adjacent to existing cities, as far from the greenbelt as practically possible, otherwise we'll have McMansions squatting wherever they can find room right next to fields and forests for the entire length of the greenbelt's boundary. Greenbelts might be like that by necessity in hyperdense places like the Netherlands, but there's no need for that in Toronto. Yet by targeting a ring of neighbouring cities for growth, I think there is a real risk of developing a Butler County, Ohio-, or Howard County, Maryland-type mess in the no-man's land between the two cities...megalopolis, here we come. I haven't read the province's plan in its entirety, so I hope they're not going to throw any plot of land that's not explicitly within the greenbelt to the wolves.
 
I don't think GO trains to K/W makes sense. It would only feed sprawl. VIA service makes more sense to me. There are some businesses which have staff need to travel into Toronto a day or two per week and VIA is fine for that. Manulife in K/W would have some people travelling into Toronto for a couple of days per week and at one point (maybe still) TD Canada Trust had some people coming in to Toronto from London on the trains once a week. K/W and London is close enough to Toronto that there is a lot of business between the cities but it is far for a commute and really GO shouldn't be encouraging sprawl into Guelph and K/W from Toronto.
 
They already go to Hamilton, which isn't much closer than Guelph. GO-related sprawl out there could be a drop in the bucket compared to what a Vaughan to Guelph highway might bring. I'm also coming from the point of view where GO would be much more than mainly a service for downtown commuters. Right now there isn't much to connect to between Guelph and Union, though, but there could be in the future. I wonder how long a GO train trip from Kitchener to Union would be...it would have to be uber cheap for people to take it and not a car.
 
The land between Toronto and Hamilton is continuous development. Do we want the same to Guelph? Guelph is past Georgetown the same distance Brantford is past Hamilton... maybe Brantford next? I don't think we should run GO Transit past greenfields... it is not a sprawl reducing technique. Yes, it might not encourage sprawl as much as a Vaughan Guelph highway but only because less people would take it and it lands you in the middle of Guelph requiring inconvenience of driving out to the Guelph neighbourhoods or taking Guelph transit. It is the inconvenience or cost of travelling far that reduces sprawl, not the mode of travel.
 
Enviro: I understand what you are saying and do agree to a certain extent. At the same time, something has to give.

Regardless of what plans are or are not in place, cities such as Guelph, Peterborough, Barrie, Kitchener/Waterloo and perhaps even Port Hope and Cobourg are going to find themselves more and more serving a role as commuter communities for the GTA. This is allready taking place to a degree in K/W and cities slightly further out are likely to see the same thing take place over the next decade or two. With the region set to grow by 2 million people over the next 20 years, places once at the very fringes are going to see new pressures.

The problem is, what do you do? It might be tempting to just put a near ban on development in the fringe cities so that growth must take place closer to the Toronto. Then you might well find the GTA facing a problem where the shrinking space within the greenbelt becomes so valueable that it pushes real estate prices through the roof and creates a breaking point where development spills over in great numbers to the other side of the greenbelt.

You could do nothing and let the region grow under aussie rules but that hasn't exactly worked out that well.

Or you try and find some balance, which seems to be the approach taken by the Places to Grow plan. If places such as Guelph are set to grow anyways, why not try to point them in a more positive direction. Yes, GO service does have the potential to fuel new sprawl. But if done proactively it could give new target growth areas a chance to develop around rail and transit travel instead of highways like previous generations.
 
Barrie may get a park and ride Greyhound terminal, while GO train service is set to resume. Given the traffic on 400 and Avenue Road, I wonder how Greyhound will be able to maintain a reliable service - the GO train on the Bradford line isn't the fastest either.

This relates to the discussion above - Barrie may only get "better buses" instead of better trains.

Park in Barrie, ride to Toronto
Bus terminal would have room for 1,000 cars
Greyhound plan would create rivalry with GO
Jun. 28, 2006. 01:00 AM
KEVIN MCGRAN
TRANSPORTATION REPORTER
Link

Greyhound Canada has come up with an $8 million mega park-n-ride proposal designed to make travelling between Toronto and Barrie faster by bus and cheaper than taking GO Transit.

The City of Barrie is considering a proposal from Greyhound to build a terminal on the south side of town with a lot large enough to provide free parking for 1,000 cars.

The service would have easy access to Highway 400 and wouldn't require annual government subsidies.

"The park-n-ride is a piece of infrastructure we think is critical to growing the commuter business and getting cars off the highway," said Dave Leach, senior vice-president of Greyhound Canada. "Access to parking is a big barrier to using commuter service."

Greyhound formally made the proposal to Barrie's council Monday night. Staff are now examining details of the plan and will report back in August.

"It's definitely an idea worth investigating," said Councillor Barry Ward, who chairs the city's community services committee. "It sounds like Greyhound is very eager, the federal government is very eager and city hall sounds interested.

"I think it gives the commuter more choices. Anything that can get traffic off the 400 would certainly help."

Greyhound is asking the federal government to buy the land and construct the terminal, which would be owned by the City of Barrie. Greyhound would lease the land and operate the facility. Any bus operator, including GO, could offer services from the facility.

Leach said the $8 million figure is only an estimate, with such factors as location, amenities, environmental impact and acreage still to be considered.

Leach said he doesn't view publicly funded GO as a competitor but as a "complementary" commuter service. GO makes frequent stops and takes about a half hour longer to get to Toronto. Greyhound runs an express commuter service and also carries parcels, he said.

At the same time, Leach said, Greyhound's Barrie to Toronto business would expand to 1,000 customers a day, up from about 380, given growth and employment projections for the region.

"And we can go farther. We believe the Greater Toronto Area is a significant growth opportunity for intercity bus."

Greyhound is a chief backer of projects like this in and around Toronto. One is in the planning stages for Guelph, while long-term plans are being examined for Peterborough and St. Catharines, Leach said.

The company is also working with Toronto on a new bus terminal near Union Station. The Toronto Economic Development Corp. got word this week it will receive up to $150,000 from Ottawa for a study on a "multi-modal" bus terminal near the Front St. station.

Greyhound says its Barrie to Toronto bus service, with a monthly pass costing $337.05, is $10 cheaper than GO's and about a half-hour faster. It runs an express service to Yorkdale Shopping Centre, then to two stops in downtown Toronto. GO makes many stops between Barrie and Newmarket, where passengers disembark to get on a train to Union Station.

GO plans to resurrect train service to Barrie, perhaps as early as next spring, but the Greyhound proposal comes at a time of intense negotiations between the province and the city. The two have not agreed on how much Barrie taxpayers should contribute toward the $25 million cost of refurbishing the rail line from Barrie. Councillor Ward said the two sides are "millions" of dollars apart.

A provincial environmental assessment is complete, federal approval is expected in August for rail service resumption, and all that remains is for the province and Barrie to agree on financial terms, said Patricia Tomasi, spokeswoman for Ontario's transportation ministry.

GO Transit referred all questions to the ministry.

In its proposal to Barrie council, Greyhound officials point out that all costs and profits would be covered through fares, while government-owned GO recovers only about 82 per cent of its costs through fares, with the rest coming in the form of a taxpayer subsidy.

Barrie is Canada's sixth-fastest growing municipality, with 103,701 residents recorded in the 2001 census. About 30 per cent of Barrie's workforce has jobs outside the city, with about 7,000 working in the Greater Toronto Area. Most of them head south on a clogged, and often dangerous, Highway 400.

"I'd want to see us get as many cars as we can possibly get off the highway," said Joe Tascona, the Progressive Conservative MPP for Barrie-Simcoe-Bradford. "If this brings jobs to Barrie and helps take cars off the road too, that will prove to be beneficial."

Tascona is among those Highway 400 commuters. "It can get very congested," he said. "All it takes is one fender-bender and the whole highway is jammed."
 
This relates to the discussion above - Barrie may only get "better buses" instead of better trains.

And worse is where said terminal's proposed: absolute unwalkable "park'n'ride" Edgefest exurbia...
 
No kidding. I wonder if Greyhound would pull out of the Barrie Downtown terminal (which is one of Ontario's better bus terminals, nice and big and serving GO, ON, Greyhound as well as Barrie Transit). The Greyhound terminals in Kingston, Belleville and Sudbury are pretty bad, Belleville's is really bad, on the edge of the town, beyond the big-boxes on Bell Blvd.
 

Back
Top