PL1
Active Member
So, 401-B?"Toronto Bypass"
So, 401-B?"Toronto Bypass"
409 would have been my thought, other than us already having one - as short as it is.Option B looks the best.
A good name would be Highway 430
More like 401-D. 401-B would be 407, 401-C would be 413.So, 401-B?
Number 3?"Toronto Bypass"
Higher radius is not just capacity but safety also - drivers don't need to change their speed. It appears these will all be two lane ramps so adding a 3rd lane won't do much (Highway is only 2 lanes per direction anyways).Can this not be addressed with wider ramps--more lanes? The 401 EB to 400 being a one lane ramp is nuts.
Because the MTO wants to one up the American highways. Officially its because they want high speed ramps, to reduce congestion. But its almost double the land take from the original ramps which were lower speed 70km ramps.Why are the freeway-to-freeway interchanges so massive? They can easily be half the size.
Not sure why, but I feel like 440 is a good choice.409 would have been my thought, other than us already having one - as short as it is.
414 would be the next sequentially.
The signage would look something like this. I can already see some confused drivers.Not sure why, but I feel like 440 is a good choice.
I don't think there's actual logic in it though.
400 <-> 440 <-> 404
401 > 407 > 413 > 419?Generally, east-west 400 series highways are assigned odd numbers, while north-south highways are assigned even numbers. The bradford bypass will likely be assigned an odd number.
That wont work for when Doug will want to amalgamate Toronto, Vaughan, York, Peel, and Markham into some super metropolis and we have mass sprawl. Then we'll be back to square one again. That way we'll have the biggest Metropolis in the world, something that Ontario can be proud of and brag about!"Toronto Bypass"
"Toronto Bypass"
Officially its because they want high speed ramps, to reduce congestion. But its almost double the land take from the original ramps which were lower speed 70km ramps.
And yet in Montreal, they do fine with the 40, 440, and 640 signage in quick succession (even the 540 until recently when it was renumbered to 30). Not to mention the 20, 520, and 720 (though that was recently renumbered to 136). Yeah, I know there's a logical system to it, but I doubt many drivers are aware of the system (which has always been broken, with missing segments. You see similar in the USA.The signage would look something like this. I can already see some confused drivers.
View attachment 442770
40, 440 and 640 have 3 different digits between them (0, 4 and 6) and one of the highways is 2 digits while other two are 3 digits. While 400, 404 and 440 have only 2 digits between them (0 and 4) and all of them are 3 digit numbers.And yet in Montreal, they do fine with the 40, 440, and 640 signage in quick succession (even the 540 until recently when it was renumbered to 30). Not to mention the 20, 520, and 720 (though that was recently renumbered to 136). Yeah, I know there's a logical system to it, but I doubt many drivers are aware of the system (which has always been broken, with missing segments. You see similar in the USA.