No one seems to have touched this, so I will: ruined the view corridor up Bay Street by looming over historic buildings such as Old City Hall. Is the suggestion here that upper Bay should have been lowrise to preserve this view? That seems an extremely odd thought to me, given that the intent of Old City Hall's tower seems quite obviously to provide a view to lower, not upper Bay, and which it does quite well.
I remember being at a dinner party and someone said that the CityPlace condos were bad because they "obstructed the view of SkyDome". I almost choked up my meal, but not knowing the crowd well I held my counsel and graciously supposed that I had misheard. About a year later, however, I had this suggestion come up again, about the SkyDome.
It seems no less strange to me that we would have only, what, 10 or 12 storey buildings on upper Bay to preserve the rear, off centre view of a historical building. Surely the Bell Trinity Building, and the Marriott already killed that view before any condos did. And, the thing about views is, depending on where you stand, a one storey building or a tree (or temporarily, a truck) ruins your view.
I'd ask the question, leaving the lake alone, are there any "view corridors" where what is being viewed is a building important to you? What are they? How should be views be preserved?