BrianPersaud
Active Member
that would have to be one questionable lender who would lend based on a property one does not even own. Unless the gains was very significant (say 25% increase in price which has happened over the last 3 years on paper at least) this is risky for both lender and borrower. Unless the lender satisfies himself that the borrower has other funds(may have other assets tied up for eg. stock) so that there is something that can be sold, this would be a very frightening(and highly stupid akin to the nonsense tht went on in the US) way of conducting business. Plus, with the exception of a few closeouts by developers, they usually do not offer 5% down and then it presumably would require CMHC coverage(insurance) which I believe adds about another 2-3 % on average to the cost of a property. Very disturbing if it turns out to be widespread. Unfortunately, CDR I don't think there is anyway other than to anecdotally to arrive at accurate figures. I hope your example is the exception and not the rule or we will be in deep trouble however while there are a few "gamblers" out there who would bet on a straight up trajectory of the market, I believe that the majority of investors cannot and therefore would not take such risks (coincidently the only thing saving those reckless individuals).
This is not neccessarily true. Talk with a mortgage broker and they will show you how. Money is cheap right now, if you played a little bit of offense with your defense by
- running your numbers with a 5%-6% interest rate today you would have great cash flow(banks are doing it now anyway if they go with the 5 year posted rate)
and
- if you bought in a growing market with some capital gains built in
you will be gold