News   Jul 15, 2024
 321     1 
News   Jul 15, 2024
 486     0 
News   Jul 15, 2024
 554     0 

Avanti (Sheppard West & Goddard St, Torbel, 9s, Kregg Fordyce) COMPLETE

5dark

New Member
Member Bio
Joined
Jan 27, 2011
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I searched the site but there were only odd references to this project which is starting construction soon (as I'm told).

Does anyone have any info about this Avanti project (by Torbel)?

Their website is: http://www.torbel.ca/avanti/
 
City Planning Final Report

Address: 758-764 Sheppard Avenue West
Designed by ... Kregg Fordyce Architect

Basically the same building template that Torbel has been stamping (too many times) all along Sheppard Avenue West in the neighbourhood... nothing too particularly exciting here :p

Recommended approval to be considered by North York Community Council on April 21, 2011:

http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-36933.pdf

Proposal
The applicant is proposing a 9-storey (27.0m in height) mixed-use building with 250m2 of ground floor commercial space and 115 condominium apartment units above. A total gross floor area of 11,725m2 is proposed resulting in a density of 3.5 times the area of the lot. One hundred and thirty-six parking spaces would be provided, 98 of which would be located below grade. The applicant has advised the development will result in two condominium corporations; one each for the residential and non-residential components. The site statistics are presented on the Application Data Sheet included as Attachment No. 5.​
 
Thanks. Since my original post I put down a down-payment for a unit here so it's very useful.

From what I've read so far I'm curious:

Are the landscaping contribution and parkland cash-in-lieu payments something developers pass onto the unit owners?
Are these typical for condo developments? I briefly browsed the Metro Place, Gramercy and Discovery final reports (not the same location, I know) and did not see any mention of these charges except for in the Gramercy document for a 5% (of development cost?) parkland payment.

Also the development charges for this is 1.5 million... the sales agent mentioned during the sale this being passed onto purchasers, is that right? That's like 15k per unit...
This was mentioned in M1+M2+Metropolis+Parkside@Metro Place final report but un-assessed at the time and didn't seem to be mentioned in the Gramercy and Discovery reports...

Referenced docs:
Metro Place: http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2007/ny/bgrd/2007-ny2-47-1_550.pdf
Gramercy: http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-23327.pdf
Discovery: http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-21832.pdf

If I'm reading this wrong let me know, I'm new at this..
 
It's been a long time, and I've since moved out but decided to leave reviews for the builder and first ex-management company we were assigned, since there seems to be little around (couldn't find any when I bought) and my reviews on google were removed.

Nadlan Harris Property Management: This was the default management company assigned by our builder, and likely Tobel's sister company (their offices were side-by-side at the time). And they were terrible; unresponsive and slow to react. Their true colours showed when we finally found a better management company and they made every part of the transition painful. Pre-authorized payment forms and cheques were lost (some 'temporarily'), the AC was 'missing' parts the new management company had to custom order, the reserve fund was found to be painfully under funded, and the cleaning company contracted was found to have no insurance. And there were many other complaints.

Torbel: cut corners and left huge parts of the development unfinished, like the gardening, signage, leaks into the garage, intercom panels, and balcony drainage. The defects I had to chase them down over after taking possession were pages long and I know neighbors who had to fight and threaten lawsuits over, like nails sticking out of the concrete in parking lots, cracked kitchen tiles, or poorly caulked bathrooms. Common elements were no better with decorative rocks with inner foam showing, a huge depression in the driveway which was our own little pot hole, a fitness room missing promised (documented) equipment, and a secretary or receptionist with serious attitude if you hinted any displeasure at the company's behavior.
This was very much a get-what-you-pay-for condo.
 
This one has been done for a while now:
P1070852.JPG
P1070853.JPG
 

Attachments

  • P1070852.JPG
    P1070852.JPG
    1.3 MB · Views: 501
  • P1070853.JPG
    P1070853.JPG
    1.3 MB · Views: 501

Back
Top