Search results

Definitely a lack of consistency with the level of density permitted across the LRT. I assume you're talking about the west end of the LRT (Chaplin -Fairbank)? At the Laird and Leaside stops (underground alignment), they are considering high densities (i.e. Celestica Lands).

I agree that they are considering a shocking level of intensfication for this stretch of Eglinton but they've done a good job of mapping out Parking and Open Space networks and are planning a good mix of building types throughout the Golden Mile. I think people's "stigma" of this stretch of...

Looks like we will be close to your 90 estimate with mid and high-rise forms. At least 40 high-rise condos being considered per the Secondary Plan.

Great design and well executed! At the top of my list for new condos

Medation for March 7, 2019 http://www.omb.gov.on.ca/ecs/CaseDetail.aspx?n=PL171293

Looks like bedrock is only a couple metres below grade? Any idea on the number of parking levels for M1, M2?

Love this mural.....brings a lot of character to the alternative blank wall

Is there a way to view the zoning/site plan submission on the Mississauga Development application website? Would love to see the plans on this one.

I love what this brings to the skyline....this is sharp and distinct.

I'm curious about that as well....Tall Buildings Guidelines require a minimum tower separation of 25 m, this looks to be 11-12 m.

I'd be surprised if they don't reach a settlement before the Hearing.

Fair point....I didn't realize how small the floor area was. Tower separation is likely to be around 25m, leaving minimal room for development.

Agreed, we will likely see an application here in the near future. Aside from the Environmental issues, separation distances to 57 Spadina and shadow concerns to the east, this site has great potential.

It would have been nice to see the brick face maintained here. The King-Spadina HCD lists this property as a Contributing Property as well, so I'm surprised to see it being demo'd.

The new renderings aren't great....you'd think these would improve for marketing purposes.

Based on OPA 82, "no net new shadows are permitted on Moss Park as measured on March 21 and September 21 from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m"......meaning it wouldn't meet City shadowing policies.

Yes, they significantly shadow the Metropolitan Church and park just west of the site and they also shadow Moss Park. file:///C:/Downloads/viewSupportingDoc.Pdf

It will be interesting to see how this plays out. Hard to ignore some of these City staff comments: "The development as proposed uses a private road that doesn’t have sidewalks, staff said, as well as driveways that are legally too short to park a car."

The former car wash. Found it interesting to see a portion of the development for a senior's residence: 209 residential condominium units and 59 senior retirement units.