Search results

Please label this "Hamilton" so its not mistaken in the threads as something from Toronto.

This is a beautiful design, if only because it's so unconventional for the city. (I am pointing out the obvious when I say that I am concerned about value engineering and the final product. This will not be cheap to build (just on the curved glass alone). I hope they can faithfully execute...

I have now seen it all: people complaining about unique retail overtaking a spot for another Shoppers Drug Mart.

The tower is certainly a mess of a design. (it's way too busy).

Please tell me that the underside of the metal will be covered in some way (and it will not look like a garden shed roof, from ground level).

A few different choices in materials and finishes (and not necessarily more expensive choices) could have saved this. (...or at least made it a "should have been better" as opposed to a "what a total blight on the city").

Yes, it is tragic that the original Moriyama complex will be essentially destroyed (and we lost another modern masterpiece just a few hundred metres away when the Aga Khan Museum was built). As for the proposals and renderings (and the plan to use "glass fiber reinforced concrete in a...

This is all kinds of cheap and ugly, isn't it. It's amazing someone with an architectural degree even designed it.

The design is a bit of a mess already. And with a tower covered in aluminum panels, it most likely will look cheap and worn before its time. I have little confidence that this will look decent in the end. And I say that with sadness.

It is difficult to tell whether this will turn out to be "not bad" or "my gosh that is bad". Yes, materials and execution will have a lot to do with it. It just appears to be confused. Open glass on one end of the podium, surrounded by what looks like a painted concrete bunker aesthetic...

There are good urban parks that do not consist of showcasing buildings of architectural interest or offer above average to spectacular views (or be one, like a terminal view) or provide connectivity between 2 or more sites . One of my favorite urban parks, probably checks off none of those...

I am not a fan of this proposal. The building on top is certainly bland (which is not such a bad thing, in this context), but I wish it continued the rhythm of all the vertical elements of the original building (while keeping the addition light, so it distracts as little as possible from the...

T(total)POS

The whole building is unintelligible. Cheap materials and bad design. It is just a mess.

Yes, regretful treatment of King St. And please please, make sure that reflective stainless steel is used and not grey matte aluminum (which seems so popular with talentless Toronto architects).

Is it a bit overbearing on the Spadina buildings? That was my first impression (granted the renderings are of a warped perspective). Love the building....wouldn't mind if the built form was a bit different (maybe stepping away from Spadina, instead of stepping forward).

Gotta give credit as to how the building actually meets the street (with the nice stone work at the base). So many condos have an unfinished looking concrete base.

If the purpose of the upper glass clad office component was to disappear and blend into the sky, while leaving the historical street facades to shine, then the building succeeded. And if it was not the intended purpose, I just found the design's best justification. ;)

How can the architects responsible for this horrible building, stand on the street and look up at the building and think "good job. This turned out fine"? An architect with even half an ounce of integrity would be ashamed.

This is so bland, so uninteresting, that it is even difficult to comment on it. I remember in the 80's the owner had a redevelopment proposal that had basically, on the outside anyhow, an 80's Chrystal Palace vibe. Think the entrance of any mall during that time period. Except the whole...