News   Jul 12, 2024
 1.1K     0 
News   Jul 12, 2024
 985     1 
News   Jul 12, 2024
 370     0 

Search results

  1. M

    Toronto St Regis Toronto Hotel and Residences | 281.93m | 58s | JFC Capital | Zeidler

    In the interests of additional angst reduction here is another photo. And revolta, you haven't been paying attention, this thing has grown a lot in the last couple of months.
  2. M

    Toronto Living Shangri-La Toronto | 214.57m | 66s | Westbank | James Cheng

    So much angst on this thread, here's a photo to make people feel better. Taken this morning.
  3. M

    Toronto 300 Front Street West | 156.05m | 49s | Tridel | Wallman Architects

    It's just the way the sun is hitting the south side of the building, lighting up those units.
  4. M

    Toronto Living Shangri-La Toronto | 214.57m | 66s | Westbank | James Cheng

    Exactly, I don't have a life so I post pics ; )
  5. M

    Toronto Living Shangri-La Toronto | 214.57m | 66s | Westbank | James Cheng

    Quick snap taken on my way back from lunch. Nota bene, very nice lunch spot.
  6. M

    Toronto 300 Front Street West | 156.05m | 49s | Tridel | Wallman Architects

    300 with it's new crane, taken this morning.
  7. M

    Toronto 300 Front Street West | 156.05m | 49s | Tridel | Wallman Architects

    I've got to think there will be a second crane for a project that size. The way they stage these things the first crane is always in a few weeks before the second, so they can start pouring while they finish excavating the rest of the site.
  8. M

    Toronto Residences at The Ritz-Carlton, Toronto | 207.86m | 53s | Graywood | Kohn Pedersen Fox

    Is this thing open soon? I walked by today and saw a table with a coffee urn and cups set up in the 2nd floor ball room. Looked all set up for an event.
  9. M

    Toronto Burano | ?m | 48s | Lanterra | a—A

    Very cool time lapse, thanks for putting in the effort. Does anyone know what type of system they are using to build the core, it looks more heavy duty than the normal system of forms. I'm referring to the yellow contraption in the middle of the building.
  10. M

    Toronto Maple Leaf Square | 185.92m | 54s | Lanterra | KPMB

    This entire discussion about the future of the ACC makes the least sense to me of almost anything I've read on UT. Why would Rogers want to go to the expense of building a new stadium when there is a brand new, highly utilized one in an amazing location available? Sorry UD your arguments...
  11. M

    Toronto First Canadian Place Rejuvenation | 298.08m | 72s | Brookfield | MdeAS Architects

    I thought Harleyjuice told us that they were changing the process a little, going from a corkscrew approach where the platforms moved in stages, to one where all the platforms move at the same time. I would guess that they had to wait a few days for the two platforms that were a little behind...
  12. M

    Toronto Maple Leaf Square | 185.92m | 54s | Lanterra | KPMB

    I like what I see, but I'm not sure about the art choice. Very fit guys working out above my bed just does not appeal to me. I can picture myself in bed with my girlfriend saying, "would you please keep your eyes on me!"
  13. M

    Southcore Financial Ctr: PricewaterhouseCoopers Tower (18 York St, bcIMC, 26s, KPMB)

    Amazing, with the exception of the office tower that is part of Ice, the entire area will be completed by the end of 2014. What a transformation.
  14. M

    Mississauga Absolute World | 169.77m | 56s | Cityzen | MAD architects

    Great shots. Amazing how much the balconies change the look of the building.
  15. M

    Toronto L-Tower | 204.82m | 58s | Cityzen | Daniel Libeskind

    ^ Clearly they've been reading UT and decided they needed more bodies on the site.
  16. M

    Toronto Charlie Condos | 122.83m | 36s | Great Gulf | Diamond Schmitt

    Thanks for all the shots, Jasonzed. This thing is finally about to get out of the ground.
  17. M

    Toronto M5V Condominiums | 118.87m | 35s | Lifetime | Core Architects

    Haha, that's ok. My comment wasn't about the absolute amount of noise, it was about the amount of noise at ISO 80 vs ISO 200. I was trying to convey that the slight increase in noise going from 80 to 200 ISO was a worthwhile trade off in order to get the increased sharpness.

Back
Top