News   Nov 22, 2024
 700     1 
News   Nov 22, 2024
 1.2K     5 
News   Nov 22, 2024
 3.2K     8 

Baby, we got a bubble!?

Paywall free: https://archive.is/0q1iz

Um. The only way any market can have both an over-supply and over-demand of any product is when prices are not adjusting to meet the equilibrium of supply and demand.

Toronto does not have an over supply of condos, instead we have manufacturers, resellers and financiers of condos that are pricing their product over what the market can/will pay. Government, land owners and developers need to find a way to make it feasible for true 2bdrm units (no dens or interior glass doors) at $500k. That’s what the market wants to buy.
 
Last edited:
Yeah I believe the condo market has just returned to balance--5 months of supply at current sales volume, if I remember correctly.

Also:


"That month the federal government capped the number of international student visas it issues, with the move expected to reduce Canada’s foreign student intake by 35 per cent this year compared with last year. However by some estimates, international study permits could be on track to drop by almost half this year.

While it’s impossible to say exactly how much of the asking rent slowdown is owing to those policy changes, it is likely significant, said Mike Moffatt, a senior director of policy at the Smart Prosperity Institute."

Always nice to see the "lack of supply" meme take another hit.
 
That sound you hear is the Liberals furiously trying to reinflate the bubble.

Extending amortizations to 30 years for first time buyers on existing homes (previously it was just new build) and raising the insurable mortgage amount to $1.5M from $1M. Both are designed the prop up prices and protect the wealth of the homeowning boomer class, the most loyal remaining part of the LPC coalition. It will do very little for affordability, just saddle young people with more debt, and increase risk in the financial system, as low downpayment 30 year amortization mortgages are at high risk of being underwater after the first 5 year term.

 
30 years is insane. No one can predict where they will be or what their financial or relationship status will be after three decades. For example, 40% of Canadian marriages end in divorce.
The biggest risk is the first renewal as very little principal is repaid in the first 5 years. So a 5% down payment gives precious little cushion for home prices to turn downwards before the borrower is underwater at renewal time. I don't think 25 or 30 years makes a material difference for predicting life circumstances at the end of the amortization period.
 
Shifting the tax burden from new development to general property tax base (ideally biased as more of a land value tax) would have the benefit of lowering resale home values and new home prices. It's obviously the right thing to do socially, but it is not politically palatable. Maybe it is a matter of having the province ban DCs altogether, or at least capping them at a certain value (much lower than present), indexed to inflation.
 

Back
Top