The main thing BMO field has going for it is that it's built in a soccer specific configuration despite having CFL played on it. The lowest seats are at ground level not 10m above to accomodate the large american football benches.
This means the seats are much closer to the field than a...
Taken on Saturday the 11th at sunset. Tried to get as close to the top of the stand to dissuade any fears about blocked views from the south stand. Keep in mind I'm still about 10-20 feet higher than the top seats and I could still see the full pitch with no blocked views.
I think its north but it's somewhat elevated, there was a rendering posted here a while back
Edit: I meant its fronting the rail tracks but its elevated, not sure if theyre north or south
As a soccer fan, my optimistic hope is that the world cup is a catalyst for the sport in the country and there's both an economic and political push to make this our national stadium with a permanent expansion to 50k+ capacity in the next decade.
Like you said theres too much space to not take...
Soccer specific stadiums with natural or hybrid grass surfaces rarely are concert venues, because building temporary stages can damage the grass.
to build a multipurpose venue either BMO would have to go the turf route or they have to go super expensive like Madrid or Tottenham Hotspur stadium...
Copa America was a general shitshow but that's par for the course with conmebol. Look up how
1000s of fans without tickets broke into the Miami stadium for the final. Fifa have their shit together in this regard.
But the core point still remains that permanent grass surfaces like BMOs will be...
Unlikely since the north end wont be completed in time for the march friendlies. Plus they still have to construct the lower temporary stand in front of it
The rogers stadium was made entirely of temporary seating and had jumping concert-goers at every concert for a whole summer. We don't need to randomly cast doubts on the quality when this has been done reliably before, even at BMO field itself