lenaitch
Senior Member
I believe the sharpie part.
I doubt he could draw a credible map of the US let alone some 'furrin' country.
I doubt he could draw a credible map of the US let alone some 'furrin' country.
...it's also plausible that RFK Jr. wouldn't know the map of Middle East was if it bit him in the arse.I believe the sharpie part.
I doubt he could draw a credible map of the US let alone some 'furrin' country.
Whats even more likely his decades of drug and alcohol abuse, on top of a brain eating worm, have turned his grey matter into a clumpy soup of fatty tissue that would make something like this out of whole cloth....it's also plausible that RFK Jr. wouldn't know the map of Middle East was if it bit him in the arse.
It was a huge success.In other news, this went much better than expected...
![]()
Kevin M. Kruse (@kevinmkruse.bsky.social)
If the estimates were right, there were about 9 million people at No Kings rallies today. That would mean this protest was THIRTY TIMES AS LARGE AS THE TEA PARTY PROTEST which we were told, over and over again, was a massively important sign that US politics had shifted dramatically to the...bsky.app
It was a huge success.
View attachment 725219
Not having a monarch does nothing appreciable to make Canada better. It's just ideological nonsense.Just because I want Canada to be a better place is a stupid reason to move to that shit hole down south
One may assert that this is Trump's attempt to play at humour. But knowing his history, he's unlikely to be joking here...It was a huge success.
View attachment 725219
As a Three Arrow person I have to disagree with this. Having no monarchy would be optimal, IMO...Not having a monarch does nothing appreciable to make Canada better. It's just ideological nonsense.
As a Three Arrow person I have to disagree with this. Having no monarchy would be optimal, IMO...
...that said, having a constitutional monarchy (which we are) that keeps the powers of the crown in check is better then one that is entirely autocratic. And there is nor real political will in our country to move from that, I gather. So I will live with that...even if it's not ideal. It's certainly better than what we got State side currently, that's for sure.
But what appreciable difference would it make in your life, and the countries, if there was no monarch?
Because there is no need, or will to do so. It would be expensive, and change very little.And the flip side of your argument is if they make no difference on the lives of Canadians and the Commonwealth, what point is there in keeping the monarchy at all? They’ve become the human equivalent of the Sam the Record Man sign that sits overlooking Sankofa Square; still around drawing resources strictly for the sake of nostalgia.
Or if I may use a more sublime comparison: PSFS is no longer, yet the building still bears the signAnd the flip side of your argument is if they make no difference on the lives of Canadians and the Commonwealth, what point is there in keeping the monarchy at all? They’ve become the human equivalent of the Sam the Record Man sign that sits overlooking Sankofa Square; still around drawing resources strictly for the sake of nostalgia.




