News   Feb 13, 2026
EX3 Climbs Higher at Exchange District in Mississauga City Centre
 2.1K     5 
News   Feb 13, 2026
Three Towers Proposed Near Mount Joy GO in Markham
 4K     1 
News   Feb 13, 2026
Explainer: Fly Forms
 4.8K     0 

Cycling infrastructure (Separated bike lanes)

bearcat said:
In the same area it would be nice if the city added some protected intersections or just even crossings signed for bikes with a bike light at the two intersections of York Mills on either side of the bridge over the railway. And further north at Shepherd and Leslie, where there's a trail ending at the the Southeast corner and the trail ending at the northwest corner, but no way to legally cross between them on a bicycle without dismounting and walking across the crosswalk.

And at least some sharrows on the local streets leading from York Mills to the beginning of Betty Sutherland trail.
Click to expand...

Given the current situation, who knows how these things will unfold, but York Mills Rd east of Lesmill is in the queue for cycle tracks in 2032.

That doesn't intersect the existing trail but would be a logical opportunity to piggy back work.

I realize sooner would be nicer; just thought I'd put that out there.

One other possible is the Mx Storage yard for GO that's proposed in this area. Its possible (but not likely) that it could trigger some work on nearby intersections/signal timing that might also provide a window.
 
Last edited:
As the Infrastructure committee ran out of time (it was about to lose quorum) the Cycling Motion is going "Without Recommendations" to Council. Not quite sure why the committee did not return tomorrow but better it goes to Council next week - though I fear there will be lots of motions, if no deputants, there.
 
DSCToronto said:
As the Infrastructure committee ran out of time (it was about to lose quorum) the Cycling Motion is going "Without Recommendations" to Council. Not quite sure why the committee did not return tomorrow but better it goes to Council next week - though I fear there will be lots of motions, if no deputants, there.
Click to expand...
IIRC, there haven't been any cases where committee meetings lasted more than one day. Given this was probably one of the most effed up IEC meetings in recent memory, there needs to be a cap on the number of speakers for these committee meetings going forward as was done for the annual budget deputations.
 
TwoWheelPoli said:
IIRC, there haven't been any cases where committee meetings lasted more than one day. Given this was probably one of the most effed up IEC meetings in recent memory, there needs to be a cap on the number of speakers for these committee meetings going forward as was done for the annual budget deputations.
Click to expand...
Probably a good idea but I still cannot see why the Committee did not adjourn and reconvene today or Monday.
 
DSCToronto said:
As the Infrastructure committee ran out of time (it was about to lose quorum) the Cycling Motion is going "Without Recommendations" to Council. Not quite sure why the committee did not return tomorrow but better it goes to Council next week - though I fear there will be lots of motions, if no deputants, there.
Click to expand...

Two of the four members of I&E ctte are also on North York Community Council which is meeting today. That conflict likely to determined the impossibility of convening today. Cllr. Peruzza is also on the Exhibition Board which is also meeting today.

Fletcher (chair) would have a conflict with a TO Live HR Ctte meeting on Monday.

Fletcher is also the Chair of Corporate Nominations Ctte, meeting on Monday and her Vice Chair is Colle.
 
Northern Light said:
Two of the four members of I&E ctte are also on North York Community Council which is meeting today. That conflict likely to determined the impossibility of convening today. Cllr. Peruzza is also on the Exhibition Board which is also meeting today.

Fletcher (chair) would have a conflict with a TO Live HR Ctte meeting on Monday.

Fletcher is also the Chair of Corporate Nominations Ctte, meeting on Monday and her Vice Chair is Colle.
Click to expand...
There is usually lots of business at CCs in November and, though I agree that with the 'new' smaller Council, people are busy and have multiple commitments, Councillors need to look carefully at time allocation - their own and those of committees, and need to work longer hours if it is necessary to get through business.
 
My gut says this is an unfortunate shitty reality of Ford slashing the size of council. Everyone's overworked and going from one meeting to the next all the time, even during lunch breaks. At committee meetings and when Council meets, councillors are doing other work at the same time. I didn't pay attention to city politics before 2018 so maybe it happened then too, but the extra workload obviously hasn't helped.
 
txlseries4 said:
My gut says this is an unfortunate shitty reality of Ford slashing the size of council. Everyone's overworked and going from one meeting to the next all the time, even during lunch breaks. At committee meetings and when Council meets, councillors are doing other work at the same time. I didn't pay attention to city politics before 2018 so maybe it happened then too, but the extra workload obviously hasn't helped.
Click to expand...
That is true, the real problem is that 24 Councillors are trying to do the work of 48 (or whatever). The answer would be to get more Councillors (impossible with Mr Ford) or have less work. Councillors spend lots of time dealing with things that staff ought to do and/or discussing things that are really not the concern of a municipality.
 
DSCToronto said:
There is usually lots of business at CCs in November and, though I agree that with the 'new' smaller Council, people are busy and have multiple commitments, Councillors need to look carefully at time allocation - their own and those of committees, and need to work longer hours if it is necessary to get through business.
Click to expand...
It also doesn't help that 2026 is a super compressed election year. After yesterday's IEC meeting, there will only be five committee meetings left with the next one on February 25, 2026 - likely due to the budget process - and the last on July 15, 2026.
 
They are inching along at the Dundas Street and Don Valley River Bridge. Taken yesterday...

20251204_161525.jpg


20251204_161556.jpg


20251204_161633.jpg


20251204_161609.jpg
 
^^^ @GameOnBrad with his usual fine update.....though i may quibble with whether there has been a full two inches of progress. 🤣

Excuse me while I borrow a pic from the above and enlarge it a wee bit...............for a closer look at those spindles:

1764971021992.png


Ummm. I know is not done.......but do not leave a job site for the weekend with it looking like that!
 
Northern Light said:
^^^ @GameOnBrad with his usual fine update.....though i may quibble with whether there has been a full two inches of progress. 🤣

Excuse me while I borrow a pic from the above and enlarge it a wee bit...............for a closer look at those spindles:

View attachment 700830

Ummm. I know is not done.......but do not leave a job site for the weekend with it looking like that!
Click to expand...
This whole project, from 'planning' ( I use the word loosely) to execution has been an embarrassment - if Parks & Recreation know the meaning of the word!
 
Northern Light said:
^^^ @GameOnBrad with his usual fine update.....though i may quibble with whether there has been a full two inches of progress. 🤣

Excuse me while I borrow a pic from the above and enlarge it a wee bit...............for a closer look at those spindles:

View attachment 700830

Ummm. I know is not done.......but do not leave a job site for the weekend with it looking like that!
Click to expand...

You noticed that, eh? Not unique to that one side either...

20251204_161623.jpg
 
GameOnBrad said:
They are inching along at the Dundas Street and Don Valley River Bridge. Taken yesterday...

View attachment 700824

View attachment 700828

View attachment 700827

View attachment 700826
Click to expand...
One change that would improve Dundas for pedestrians, cyclists and transit users would be the deletion of the DVP north ramp. I’m surprised no one walking or cycling across the ramp entrance has not been hit by turning vehicles. And watching the packed eastbound 506 stopped behind one or two cars waiting to turn left as an endless parade of cars comes westbound is rather sad.

This bridge construction project seems the ideal time to chop off that DVP ramp. There are still many places to join the DVP north, at Jarvis, Eastern, Queen, Bayview, Bloor and Don Mills.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top