Toronto Bayside Block R6 | ?m | ?s | CreateTO

I wonder if it would be worth flipping the residential component planned for R6 to block C1 which is more suited to a taller tower.
 
Photo 2025-04-03, 11 57 50 AM.jpg


"LAKE R-6" is now a Construction Yard for the nearby HINES buildings that are finishing-up this year...
 
R6 is on the HOUSING TRACKER at the CreateTO Board meeting on Tuesday -- but it is still classed as "pipeline / future-project" and most of the important stuff is "TBD"...



1763336081522.png


SOURCE -
(November 3, 2025) Report from the Chief Executive Officer, CreateTO on Housing Progress Update, Attachment 1 - Housing Tracker
PDF - https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2025/ra/bgrd/backgroundfile-259780.pdf
 
🤔 I lived in a TCHC building over by Maple Leaf Gardens almost 20 years ago, that (I was told) was part of the Regent Park Phase 1-3, even though it was nowhere near it.

The same could easily be done here. They should just add it to the Quayside plan, since it's right across the street.
 
Northern Light said:
Not that this adds a ton of info, but this got passing mention in the IREC Ctte Dashboard for WT last week: (

View attachment 696194
Click to expand...
Do you have a SOURCE / LINK for that image..? I cannot seem to find the Agenda / Presentations on-line anymore at Waterfront Toronto website. Thx!
 
HousingNowTO said:
Do you have a SOURCE / LINK for that image..? I cannot seem to find the Agenda / Presentations on-line anymore at Waterfront Toronto website. Thx!
Click to expand...

Nope. WT no longer posts the agendas on their website, you have to request them to be emailed to you.
 
Northern Light said:
Nope. WT no longer posts the agendas on their website, you have to request them to be emailed to you.
Click to expand...
Yes this is infuriating and due to WT being unable to provide AODA Compliant documents. I really doubt that AODA was designed to restrict documents from everyone and cannot understand why WT are unable to post things in AODA format - the City appears to be able to so why not WT. For an organisation that was once a leader in openness and communication it is a sad descent!
 
DSCToronto said:
Yes this is infuriating and due to WT being unable to provide AODA Compliant documents. I really doubt that AODA was designed to restrict documents from everyone and cannot understand why WT are unable to post things in AODA format - the City appears to be able to so why not WT. For an organisation that was once a leader in openness and communication it is a sad descent!
Click to expand...

I'm starting to wonder if WT are simply understaffed.
 
DSCToronto said:
Yes this is infuriating and due to WT being unable to provide AODA Compliant documents. I really doubt that AODA was designed to restrict documents from everyone and cannot understand why WT are unable to post things in AODA format - the City appears to be able to so why not WT. For an organisation that was once a leader in openness and communication it is a sad descent!
Click to expand...
The City of Toronto literally removed DECADES of old documents from the public record in about 2015 because of the way that AODA is interpreted.

Our OPEN DATA volunteers have many concerns with how AODA is currently scoped and enforced when it comes to reports and public records.
 
HousingNowTO said:
The City of Toronto literally removed DECADES of old documents from the public record in about 2015 because of the way that AODA is interpreted.

Our OPEN DATA volunteers have many concerns with how AODA is currently scoped and enforced when it comes to reports and public records.
Click to expand...
It is one thing to remove old documents due to AODA but quite another not to put NEW ones online because you cannot meet it.
 
What was the thinking in having shorter buildings west of Sherbourne but reaching for god east of Monde?
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top