Toronto 88 Isabella | 199.22m | 62s | Capital Developments | Diamond Schmitt

IMG_2035.jpeg
IMG_2037.jpeg
 
what are they doing demolishing it now then? They aren't selling 750 units here any time soon.

A few notes:

1) SPA is still 'Under Review' - No NOAC

2) No Permits in process for the 'New Build'

3) From the industry crowd here.............I agree with Innsert's take above, but with up to 82 tenants re-located and many likely receiving a rent subsidy what are the economics of sitting on a project like this for an extend period of time>?

Property Taxes, security, interest on debt if applicable, tenant assistance costs.........
 
@Johnny Au

While I admit your Godzilla + apartment building "bite" better approximates the actual 88 Isabella demo in the photo above (and thus more "Likes" :-(
... I've repeatedly warned you about going down the AI rabbit hole way too often.

I've consulted Gemini, Siri, Alexa, your friends and family and many others... and all agree that you:
a) are spending way to much time in the nebulous AI ether
b) your sleep patterns have been dramatically altered

You are much-beloved here at UT and we are considering an intervention if the behaviour persists. ❤️🖥️
 
@Johnny Au

While I admit your Godzilla + apartment building "bite" better approximates the actual 88 Isabella demo in the photo above (and thus more "Likes" :-(
... I've repeatedly warned you about going down the AI rabbit hole way too often.

I've consulted Gemini, Siri, Alexa, your friends and family and many others... and all agree that you:
a) are spending way to much time in the nebulous AI ether
b) your sleep patterns have been dramatically altered

You are much-beloved here at UT and we are considering an intervention if the behaviour persists. ❤️🖥️
I have created a thread regarding this:

 
A few notes:

1) SPA is still 'Under Review' - No NOAC

2) No Permits in process for the 'New Build'

3) From the industry crowd here.............I agree with Innsert's take above, but with up to 82 tenants re-located and many likely receiving a rent subsidy what are the economics of sitting on a project like this for an extend period of time>?

Property Taxes, security, interest on debt if applicable, tenant assistance costs.........
I wonder how much the rent was before the building was vacated. I know some tenants in vintage buildings like this are paying just around $1k per month in rent. That would mean the developer has to pay a rent subsidy of at least $1k/ month while the tenants live elsewhere. Delaying construction by 2-3 years would cost them $24-36k per tenant for the subsidy alone. I suppose that's peanuts compared to proceeding without enough buyers for the condo units.
 
A few notes:

1) SPA is still 'Under Review' - No NOAC

2) No Permits in process for the 'New Build'

3) From the industry crowd here.............I agree with Innsert's take above, but with up to 82 tenants re-located and many likely receiving a rent subsidy what are the economics of sitting on a project like this for an extend period of time>?

Property Taxes, security, interest on debt if applicable, tenant assistance costs.........
It's very difficult to get people out; so once you can get the building vacant, you begin the process. I am almost sure this would be on the heels of constructing the new building.
 

Back
Top