Toronto Rogers Centre Renovations | ?m | ?s | Toronto Blue Jays | Populous

-Devon- said:
From a purely aesthetic perspective, the new seating arrangement and field layout don't look good. I've never liked asymmetrical field shapes, a la Fenway Park. The Dome had near perfect symmetry before with respect to the shape of the field and the seating sections.

Focusing on the latter: the execution of the new seating sections behind home plate looks terrible. The aisles are all disjointed and don't line up well with those in the 200 Level. The concrete walls that demarcate the 100 Level into three different tiers is not only utilitarian in appearance, but it exacerbates the messiness of the overall plan. It looked so much better when the 100 Level mirrored the clean, elongated lines of the 500 Level.

Also, was it really necessary to incorporate the VIP seating behind the backstop in such a way that it had to be separated with those walls? I don't like how truncated this all looks. There some other issues that I also dislike, such as the diagonal Blue Monster foul territory wall in left field. I feel like this could have been handled better with more careful attention to details.
Click to expand...
Is the symmetry going to even be noticeable with people in the stands though? Does it change the experience of the game?

As a fan sitting in the stands this looks to be a much better experience. I guess I’ll see how I feel in a couple weeks.
 
-Devon- said:
From a purely aesthetic perspective, the new seating arrangement and field layout don't look good. I've never liked asymmetrical field shapes, a la Fenway Park. The Dome had near perfect symmetry before with respect to the shape of the field and the seating sections.
Click to expand...

It's not just Fenway Park - the vast majority of ballparks were assymetrical until the modernist/multi-use stadiums of the 1970s and 1980s. Creating assymetry has been a hallmark of the neo-classical revival that started immediately after SkyDome was built. Beauty may be in the eye of the beholder but to be clear: assymetrical parks are absolutely intrinsic to baseball and symmetry was basically a fad.

-Devon- said:
Focusing on the latter: the execution of the new seating sections behind home plate looks terrible. The aisles are all disjointed and don't line up well with those in the 200 Level. The concrete walls that demarcate the 100 Level into three different tiers is not only utilitarian in appearance, but it exacerbates the messiness of the overall plan. It looked so much better when the 100 Level mirrored the clean, elongated lines of the 500 Level.
Click to expand...

Eh. Again, this is subjective and we're looking at a few angled pictures. I'll wait to see how it looks on TV and in person before judging but, again, many of the new ballparks (Yankee Stadium comes to mind off the top of my head) have this sort of staggered/split 100-Level seating. Whether they line up with upper levels... is something I've literally never noticed but I'd guess that, again, it was never typical of ballpark design. I was in Detroit last year and it also has these splits in the aisles, vertically and horizontally (not in an identical configuration but still). It's a subjective criticism of a classic baseball design, it seems to me.

NEW YORK:
1712079608995.png

DETROIT:
1712079539838.png



-Devon- said:
Also, was it really necessary to incorporate the VIP seating behind the backstop in such a way that it had to be separated with those walls? I don't like how truncated this all looks.
Click to expand...

This is less about baseball than money, of course. But it's also a trend. And it's certainly improvement on the jerry-rigged backstop seating they've had at the dome for the past 20 years or so. Again, I'll wait to see it in action before drawing any conclusions. If we could afford to sit there, we'd probably want to be separated from the riff-raff with walls too ;)
 
mwgsmith said:
Sadly, “net” foul poles remain…

Otherwise, I agree, it looks great!
Click to expand...
I think it has more to do with the height of them more then being able to be removed although was a factor in the design of them. Putting in a permanent foul pole the height it would be needed in the Rogers centre would be a massive undertaking and would probably need it's own footing.
 
-Devon- said:
The reason for that asymmetry in older parks is due to the fact that they were built on constrained sites and shoehorned into tight city blocks. Many of the postwar and contemporary stadiums are built on wide open land, thus, replicating asymmetrical field layouts is contrived, as opposed to being a result of limited space to work with.



In the instances where the aisles don't line up, they're generally centered with corresponding seating sections in other levels. It looks like there is a little bit of asymmetry in the upper deck at the new Yankee Stadium, however, the new 100 Level seats at the SkyDome are much more haphazard in their pattern. Some of the aisles in the new lower seating areas are at such odd, oblique angles when contrasted with their adjacent 200 Level sections. Anyway, these are just some observations that I've had. I wonder if Buck Martinez shares my sentiments.
Click to expand...
I'll say this, having gone to games for 25+ years, the rebuilt 100 level will almost certainly be a massive improvement for the in-game viewing experience compared to the old seating deck. The issue of the 100 level not being completely symmetrical or aligned with the 200 and 500 level sections is a pretty minor qualm IMO considering the net benefit of a much improved 100 level. I don't think the minor misalignment is by choice either; you can blame the round/oval design of the Dome and maybe blame lies directly with the designers/architects who designed the thing almost 40 years ago. In an ideal world, the upper decks wouldn't be circular but would follow the curvature of the 100 level.

If you look at this recent photo though, the incline grade and orientation of the 100 level baseline sections is actually better aligned with the 200 and 500 levels than the previous seating deck was, which actually curved towards the corners and was sort of slanted away from the diamond. It's a pretty substantial improvement and much more baseball-centric.

1712170304595.png

1712170695972.png
 
Are the hand railings an accessibility requirement? They seem high and might interfere with sightlines. I don't believe the 100 level (infield) had hand railings before.
 
We have a couple storeys up on the front page for your edification:

urbantoronto.ca

Rogers Centre Seating Upgrades Ready For Home Opener | UrbanToronto

Over the past two off-seasons, a completely privately-funded renovation of the Rogers Centre of just under $400 million has reworked the space with baseball in mind. In Blue Jays President and CEO Mark Shapiro’s words, the renovation's purpose was “to transition from a multipurpose stadium to a...
urbantoronto.ca urbantoronto.ca

urbantoronto.ca

Rogers Centre Upgrades From Stadium to Ballpark | UrbanToronto

The 2024 Rogers Centre renovations extend to improvements made to the playing field and player facilities, while moving away from the multi-purpose stadium design that once characterized the venue to a baseball-specific one.
urbantoronto.ca urbantoronto.ca

42
 
Did they have to go with grey as an accent colour? It's so drab. Especially those grey faux stone walls and the Landlord Special grey "wood" benches. I know it's one of the uniform colours but it would've been nice to have some warmer tones in the mix.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top