News   Dec 19, 2025
 703     0 
News   Dec 19, 2025
 566     0 
News   Dec 19, 2025
 804     0 

Toronto Eglinton Line 5 | ?m | ?s | Metrolinx | Arcadis

The Richmond Hill Line passes the Crosstown LRT between the Wynford & Sloane stops. While they may not require a connection in 4 years time, they should make a provision for a further connection in a decade or two, between the LRT and the Richmond Hill GO train.

After first getting a better connection at the Richmond Hill Oriole GO Station and the Leslie Subway Line 4 Station, of course.
There's another option that would render that connection mostly redundant:

Richmond Hill service, once it becomes single deck RER, or some form of metro. is diverted to become the most northerly leg of of the DRL, and so interchange would happen at the Science Centre. 'Express trains' from Richmond Hill to Union would continue to use the Don Valley, stop at Langstaff, Old Cumnmer, Oriole and perhaps have a stop Queen Street to transfer to TTC, Relief Line and Lakeshore East services.
 
There's another option that would render that connection mostly redundant:

Richmond Hill service, once it becomes single deck RER, or some form of metro. is diverted to become the most northerly leg of of the DRL, and so interchange would happen at the Science Centre. 'Express trains' from Richmond Hill to Union would continue to use the Don Valley, stop at Langstaff, Old Cumnmer, Oriole and perhaps have a stop Queen Street to transfer to TTC, Relief Line and Lakeshore East services.
In the short term, if we do get TTC fares for GO within Toronto, we can run minimum hourly service on Richmond Hill line. This should provide some relief to the Yonge Line.
 
The Richmond Hill Go line south of Oriole is not in a very station friendly area. It's way down in the Don River, and it only gets worse the far south you go. It's not in a good spot for any type of upgrade (ie. multiple tracks) much less a station at Eglinton. Not to mention the possibility of flooding that the lower Don River has at times. That is why is was never really considered.
 
The Richmond Hill Go line south of Oriole is not in a very station friendly area. It's way down in the Don River, and it only gets worse the far south you go. It's not in a good spot for any type of upgrade (ie. multiple tracks) much less a station at Eglinton. Not to mention the possibility of flooding that the lower Don River has at times. That is why is was never really considered.
Speaking of Richmond Hill GO Line, is this kind of alignment for track possible (yes I know it would be expensive with the grade separation with the current track required)? Then there could be a potential to have half of the trains to use the current track, and the other half to use the new alignment, preferably the peak direction to use the new faster route. And maybe have a station at Leslie & Eglinton.
RHLine.PNG
 

Attachments

  • RHLine.PNG
    RHLine.PNG
    2 MB · Views: 738
Speaking of Richmond Hill GO Line, is this kind of alignment for track possible (yes I know it would be expensive with the grade separation with the current track required)? Then there could be a potential to have half of the trains to use the current track, and the other half to use the new alignment, preferably the peak direction to use the new faster route. And maybe have a station at Leslie & Eglinton.
View attachment 139184
I recall a study for this. I think that townhouse complex at the top left prevented the blue alignment. The red alignment may have been too tight for GO trains. I think both were looked at. Maybe if 2 new bridges were built than an alignment in between would be possible.
 
Richmond Hill line is tough, because it has so much potential, but all options turn out to be quite expensive.

The current issue of Richmond Hill line is this: the current alignment is quite slow through the Don Valley, and it goes through a flood plain.

The solution to fix the flood plain is about $1.3 billion. Not cheap and will take time.

There is another option: Metrolinx purchased the CP Don Branch back in 2011. It offers a much straighter and faster route, and avoids the flood area.

Unfortunately it too has problems: namely that there is a lot of work to be done to refurbish and replace the track along the alignment, part goes through a very active CP mainline, as well that part of the alignment was ripped out and replaced with a bike path,

Now, that bike path, the Leaside Spur, is actually land owned by Metrolinx and the city has a temporary provision to use it as a bike path. At any point Metrolinx could revoke that permission and build a rail line in their. However, the question is, would they?

As you can imagine, the NIMBYISM would be out of control. That spur goes through a quiet neighbourhood of houses abutting the spur line.

The only thing I could possibly ever see being allowed on that area, would be some Tram-Train LRTs that are both compatible with heavy rail, but very light and quiet. That way you could sell to the locals of that area that they are getting an LRT, much like the Artbus corridor in Vancouver.

That still leaves Transport Canada to contend with. Metrolinx owns the lines from Union to the York sub just north of Steeles, and as we see with the Ion LRT in kitchener, TC will allow special provisions for LRTS to run on heavy rail spurs. However north of the York sub CN owns the lines and operates freight on it. I doubt TC would allow an LRT to operate there. Not including over the CP mainline that you must navigate to get to the Don Branch to downtown.

Furthurmore, it appears that VIA will want to use the Don Branch for its HFR trains, so scheduling will become even tighter on this line.

So as you can see there are a lot of issues with Richmond Hill, and solutions, but none of them are easy or a simple cost effective one.

Personally I think that Metrolinx should just operate a fleet of DMU's on the RH line while it fixes the problems with the flooding and the Don Branch connections, as it will be a long time coming before they offer anything better on this line.
 
The Leaside spur runs through some of the wealthiest neighbourhoods in the country. pushback would be strong. It literally goes right by the Bridlepath.
 
Now, that bike path, the Leaside Spur, is actually land owned by Metrolinx and the city has a temporary provision to use it as a bike path. At any point Metrolinx could revoke that permission and build a rail line in their. However, the question is, would they?

As you can imagine, the NIMBYISM would be out of control. That spur goes through a quiet neighbourhood of houses abutting the spur line.

I think it's owned by the City. And we may be overestimating the level of Nimbyism. Sure there would be an uproar just as there is with any project, but it's a fairly wide corridor (30-40m) and it's only really the ROW that's important. In other words any new rail infrastructure could be below grade through the problematic parts. Roughly this would entail a 1.6km trench + cut/cover section between Overland and Bond. Even with no Nimbys such a thing would likely be proposed regardless since it allows a grade-separation at Lawrence. The result may be similar to what was built in Weston with UPX.
 
what is the cost of flooding prevention + electrification of RH vs. the whole DRL long?
The Relief Line South should be built either way. A proper comparison is Relief Line North and RH Line 2WAD vs Don Mills LRT and RH Line RER.
 
Last edited:
The Relief Line South should be built either way. A proper comparison is Relief Line North and RH Line 2WAD vs RH Line RER.

Kinda a stupid comparison. After Crosstown and RL the Don Mills LRT had the highest ridership of any rapid transit project. I can get saying whether RLN should be LRT or subway. But The demand for a rapid transit corridor along Don Mills is there today, and comparing it either/or to a commuter train a couple km away is kinda useless. Both are good projects but obviously serve different purposes.
 

Back
Top