AlvinofDiaspar
Moderator
I wonder if radiant heaters like that are roof mounted to prevent fires from water/salt/paper/clothing nearer floor level?
Or bodily hazard/tampering.
AoD
I wonder if radiant heaters like that are roof mounted to prevent fires from water/salt/paper/clothing nearer floor level?
The building would also have to sit far away from the intersection on the side of the roadway to avoid obscuring traffic. This would add at least 50-100 metre on pipping and the purchase of a parcel of prime land. Alternatively they can build a roof and put the equipment on top or in an underground room (pumping equipment required plus time to excavate).Its a very expensive addition to the project. If you look at the system being used on the GO platforms they are using glycol system which requires a full mechanical system, boiler, pump, etc. to operate. They are using this system because they probably have a building where they can house this equipment and they have a lot of area to heat, If you were to do this for the Crosstown you would probably go with electric heating cables in the concrete - which require high voltage 3 phase power.
So increased costs associated with the installation and then maintenance and energy costs moving forward. Not saying they shouldn't do it - but these add up and should be part of the discussion. (they also breakdown regularly and repairs are not easy/cheap)
In ground heating is not used for comfort (well maybe those heated tile floors for washrooms) - it is used to melt snow and ice. If they add heaters similar to those others have posted they can be controlled by switches and timers which should reduce energy costs. Changes are needed for these stops (can't really call them stations) and something as simple as comfort upgrades are a low hanging fruit (although people may start wanting them around the City)Except that heat rises and cold sinks. Inefficient use of energy. The heat source should be below so that the heat will rise.
![]()
Which is why floor or pavement heating is better.
In ground heating is not used for comfort (well maybe those heated tile floors for washrooms) - it is used to melt snow and ice. If they add heaters similar to those others have posted they can be controlled by switches and timers which should reduce energy costs. Changes are needed for these stops (can't really call them stations) and something as simple as comfort upgrades are a low hanging fruit (although people may start wanting them around the City)
Promenade Terminal?Took these yesterday and wanted to point out that even though this looks like a very simple and unsophisticated setup, it's probably going to be far better than anything that will be built on the Crosstown line. In my opinion, these are even better than the Viva stops when it comes to warmth in the middle of winter.
View attachment 108179
View attachment 108180
Took these yesterday and wanted to point out that even though this looks like a very simple and unsophisticated setup, it's probably going to be far better than anything that will be built on the Crosstown line. In my opinion, these are even better than the Viva stops when it comes to warmth in the middle of winter.
View attachment 108179
View attachment 108180
I would give this a week until it became a homeless person orgy house if it were built in downtown toronto.
Unfortunately thats just the reality of the situation.
Boom.
(Although the article says that these vehicles are larger than the Bombardier ones -- I wonder if that would have any impact on stop platforms.)
How do you figure that? Metrolinx is padding the cupboard. Doubtless they have an option on configuration for these. I've posted links above, here's some pics to look at: (Note the use of the term "freedom"...bit of a dig, and also the toilet option, these straddle being 'RER light' in the dual-voltage option run as "tram-trains" on GO electrified track as well as Eglinton Crosstown):Having 150+ LRT's that we will have to pay cancellation fees for....another Fiberal boondoggle.




