News   Apr 30, 2024
 292     0 
News   Apr 30, 2024
 765     3 
News   Apr 30, 2024
 860     0 

Transformation AGO (5s, Gehry) COMPLETE

Update: They're putting up the Titanium cladding for the north facade of the Contemporary Block.

I found it strange that there is so little information on just what the Dundas Street Colonnade will look like at the street level. What are those pillars supporting Galleria Italia going to be clad in? What is the ceiling going to be like - there are ventilation ducts, but are they for the street level? The question goes on and on...

While the AGO has been good about documenting the actual construction lately, they have been very stingy in providing renders of what's to come.

Don't they know that there's a forum-load of misfits waiting for this info? Feed me AGO!

42
 
i42:

I think this is of interest beyond the forum level though - considering they're narrowing the public ROW with their addition, it's pretty imperative that street level will be handled appropriately. Like as a quasi-public space, just how will travelling through that colonnade feel like?

Ideally, this question should have been settled before construction started.

AoD
 
I agree with you completely. There really should have been detailed renderings of the Dundas Street frontage of this development from the get-go. My reference to misfits is of course tongue-in-cheek, but I put it there more because I believe that developers often think that anyone who shows an 'undue' amount of interest in a project must be one. That, however, is not the case, and the citizens of this fair burgh have the right to know how the gallery plans to improve this rather lengthy stretch of city street, and an important one at that.

One of the posted articles about the construction mentions that only lately has the AGO realized the need to be more open with the community about its plans, and like I said, it is doing better reporting now, but we are still just getting to see what has been done, and have been told little to nothing at all about what is still to come outside along Dundas' sidewalk.

42
 
I've only been to the AGO once but I'm definitely going to go see the Gehry when it's done...er, and the art. And this time I won't be dragged there on a gr.8 school trip!

Gehry for the Aquarium.

Aquehryum?

Seriously. Gehry, who loves fish, and has employed their shape and their scales in so many of his buildings, should do an aquarium, and it should be ours.

Now, who has $500 000 000?

Sorry, but I'm going to have to use my veto (every forumer gets one per thousand posts) to postpone the Aquehyrum until Gehry has transparent aluminum to work with.
 
Along the Dundas frontage the concrete columns are finished. That's why they're wrapped up with plywood and insulation along their bottoms, to protect them.

The frontage will also have a wood soffit, and there's massive potlights that have been installed to shine up through the Galleria.
 
I am more curious to see how this project's interiors turn out then the ROM. Also, I look forward to checking out the Thompson collection, even though on the face his taste in art and artifacts would not correspond to mine.
 
From the Globe:

VISUAL ARTS: THE ART GALLERY OF ONTARIO REBUILD
Getting the hang of it
As the AGO prepares for its fall reopening, curators face a crucial question: How do you deploy your collection in the new space to best tell the story of art? Sarah Milroy reports

SARAH MILROY

July 19, 2008

New museum buildings have a way of hogging the spotlight, with the great unveiling of the architect's vision overshadowing the real point of it all: the art, and how it is installed in the new spaces.

But the Art Gallery of Ontario's director Matthew Teitelbaum likes to think about art - more, perhaps, than is customary in museum directors these days, who tend to preoccupy themselves almost exclusively with fundraising and the challenges of management. In fact, as his Toronto museum's $254-million overhaul by renowned Los Angeles architect Frank Gehry nears completion, he knows every inch of the reinstallation by heart and he walks me through the plans with the slightly anxious air of a mathematician unveiling an as-yet-unproved theorem.

Is it appropriate, though, for a director - even one who was formerly a curator, as is the case with Teitelbaum - to get his hands dirty in curatorial affairs? "I think so, absolutely," he says, as we conclude a tour of the miniature models of the galleries and the works of art they will contain. These days, they are set up in a working space near the museum's gallery school, a kind of backstage laboratory for the still ongoing discussions about the collection, and how best to deploy it.

"This is how we deliver on the promise. We have to provide a great experience of looking at art," Teitelbaum says. "Otherwise, why have we put people through all of this?"

The suite of cardboard models are filled with Lilliputian mini-replicas of the AGO's prime works of art, and they reflect the results of hundreds of hours of curatorial collaboration, conflict and, finally, consensus between him and his curators, headed up by Dennis Reid, director of collections and research, and the gallery's new director of exhibitions and publications, Catherine de Zegher. Upstairs, in the new contemporary art tower and in some of the European galleries below, the real process of moving art into the galleries is well under way.

There are some complexities. For example: How to keep the multifaceted Kenneth Thomson gift intact as a physical entity (it includes ship models, important Canadian paintings, medieval ivories and miniature boxwood carvings) while still integrating it into the narrative of art history that is the collection as a whole? And how to exploit areas of strength in the collection without lending undue weight to relatively minor historical players? In other words: How do you tell the story of art working with what you've got?

It can be tricky. "For better or worse, we have the biggest collection of Robert Motherwell works on paper in the world," says Teitelbaum, offering an example. "I happen to think it's for the good."

In the new galleries, Motherwell will have a space of his own, reflecting this area of the museum's strength, and the installation will include two major large-scale canvases by the American abstract expressionist.

But Motherwell will be showcased not solely thanks to the scale of his accomplishment, which is relatively minor compared with many of his contemporaries that one could name. Rather, in this collection, his works allow the curators to tell a story about artistic influence and art's relationship to its historical moment. Motherwell will be positioned between the galleries devoted to European surrealism (a strength of the AGO's holdings) and those focusing on British modernist sculpture (another area of richness), rightly presenting him as a seminal carrier of ideas between continental Europe and the world beyond, a world freshly traumatized by war.

In this last gallery, the curators are presenting a 1976 film projection of an atomic blast by contemporary artist Bruce Conner.

"The focus here is not just on the question: Where does abstract expressionism come from as a style in art, or as a point in the continuum of art history," says Teitelbaum. "Instead, the focus is on: How does it express a moment in time? What factors are involved in the creation of an artistic style?"

Abstract expressionism, he adds, speaks of "the impossibility of image making, and the need for a raw expression of horror and degradation." A small bronze depicting a grieving woman's face and hands, made in 1938 by the German expressionist Kathe Kollwitz, will be positioned near the great Motherwell canvases, its presence aiming to underscore the humanitarian crisis of the era.

This will be one of the most striking aspects of the AGO re-hang - the coupling of works of art from different periods, or different cultures - and it will be a gamble, either having the liveliness and surprise of an ingenious salad, lightly tossed, or the disarray of a dog's breakfast. Like the thematic installations of art at London's Tate Modern (which have been both praised for making art accessible and reviled for quelling art's complexity), success will depend entirely on how the objects interact with each other in real space, and that can be hard to predict. The possibilities, though, are intriguing.

One dramatically sky-lit gallery designed by Gehry to house the Arctic landscapes of Lawren Harris will also showcase three of the masterpieces of Northwest Coast aboriginal art from the Dundas Collection, acquired for the AGO by patron David Thomson last year.

Another gallery, featuring work by the contemporary Montreal artist Betty Goodwin, will include an Inuit carving of a ghost figure in bone, an object made 10,000 years ago - a juxtaposition aimed at highlighting and refining Goodwin's theme of memory and loss.

A third space pairs a rough-hewn landscape by London, Ont., painter Paterson Ewen with a 19th-century buffalo hide inscribed by an unknown Crow artist, the combination suggesting two culturally divergent ideas of landscape, and art's capacity to embody a sense of place and belonging.

One of the most striking of these dramatic moments is likely to be the adjacency of the newly acquired marble crucifixion titled Corpus (1655) by the Italian baroque artist Bernini and a contemporary sculptural installation by Canadian artist David Altmejd. Altmejd's work will be displayed next door to Bernini's in a space flanking the Grange. With more than 300 years between them, these artists have both produced spectacular evocations of the male body, charged with sensuality and decadence. Both also portray the male form in the throes of mystical transformation. How will the two artists come to reveal each other?

The design of the contemporary galleries also allows for smaller spaces in which the curators can single out particular artistic careers for consideration, a strategy that implies an artist-centred view, holding up the importance of the singular accomplishment and vision.

These little incubators will allow for more intense, up-close confrontations with key figures, among them Michael Snow, Robert Smithson, Jack Chambers, Gerhard Richter and the artist collectives N.E. Thing Company and General Idea. (Nearly 30 per cent of the contemporary work on display will be new acquisitions.) Throughout these galleries, the emphasis will be on chronology, with contemporaneous but stylistically divergent objects rubbing shoulders, works that would normally not be seen out in public together.

In one gallery, for example, a political painting from 1967 by African-American artist Faith Ringgold, from her series titled The American People, will be installed next to the museum's magisterial Donald Judd stack piece, which was made the following year - a minimalist icon in reflective metal and tinted glass. Both can be considered works of political art, but they operate in very different ways. Together, it is hoped they will deliver a snapshot in time, jumping the ruts of art-historical classification.

One of Teitelbaum's favourite examples of this will occur on a fourth-floor landing, where visitors will be greeted by an Alexander Calder mobile overhead and beneath it three small sculptures on pedestals dating from the period 1960-62: one by British modernist Barbara Hepworth, the second by French-American sculptor Louise Bourgeois and the third by the Inuit artist Louise Anguatsiark Tungilik.

"These women were not in dialogue at the time," Teitelbaum says, "but they can be now." Museums are blessed with the gift of hindsight, this installation implies. They should use it creatively.

Toronto's Art Gallery of Ontario re-opens to the public on Nov. 14.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/serv...9.AGO19/TPStory/?query=art+gallery+of+ontario

AoD
 
From the most recent AGO Member Letter:
Friday, July 4. 2008
The Grange 2008 and the Ridley Members’ Lounge
“Since The Grange closed in 2005 – when the entire house was encased in wood to protect it during construction – staff, volunteers, members and the public have been looking forward to revisiting the historic house. This fall, when the transformed AGO opens to the public, The Grange will enjoy more visibility than before the expansion, and in fact will become even more integral to the AGO.

The Gallery’s Ridley Members’ Lounge will now reside in The Grange on its ground floor. The new location will create a distinctive setting for members to relax, while ensuring that the house is an integrated part of an AGO visit. Public access to the Goldwin Smith library and historic kitchen complex will continue.
"All plans have taken into consideration a house that is valued as the AGO’s first home, and that will continue to be celebrated for its heritage," said Jenny Rieger, historic site coordinator, The Grange.

The AGO has devoted considerable resources to protect and conserve art associated with The Grange. The nineteenth-century portrait of William Henry Boulton by George Berthon was recently restored through a generous donation from Gretchen and Donald Ross. Extensive care was also taken to protect the large painted glass window above the main foyer throughout construction, and the heating and humidity monitoring system has been upgraded. Volunteers will continue to be a critical part of The Grange and the new AGO, helping to welcome members and visitors. “

I've emailed the AGO for clarification; does this mean the main floor dining rooms and parlours and the upstairs ballroom will no longer be open to the public? I wait for a response, but this sounds like the only very sour note in what's been a beautiful symphony.
 
The main floor rooms are for members. The Library will still be open to the public so it's likely that the second floor will be as well.
 
. Gehry's AGO reno is a refreshingly understated departure from the Big Hair stylings that many expected

understated? it looks like an airport terminal...and not a particularly interesting one. just put a multi level parking garage in front and there you have it.
the understated new ago...departures level drop off!
the new rom? now there's some big hair!
 
understated? it looks like an airport terminal...and not a particularly interesting one. just put a multi level parking garage in front and there you have it.
the understated new ago...departures level drop off!
the new rom? now there's some big hair!

I think you have a very low appreciation of airport architecture. Most cities don't hesitate to enlist creative modernist architects to make a good first impression. Our new Terminal 1 is no exception.

But you're saying it looks like a bad terminal. I don't recall many terminals with a whimsical spiral staircase coming out of the building, blue titanium used as cladding or such a curved seventy foot high glass and wood front facade.
 
The main floor rooms are for members. The Library will still be open to the public so it's likely that the second floor will be as well.

That's what it sounds like and that's what bothers me. I've been a member since Jesus was a beardless youth so I'll have access. What concerns me is that The Grange be maintained as a restored picture of what life might have been like there in the 19th century. In order to appreciate that the general public must have access to the WHOLE house, as they did before this renovation began.

I'll wait to see what response I get from the AGO; I'll post it here when I get it.
 
Yes, I was rather alarmed by that too. Does the ground floor of The Grange really need to be reinvented as a private club?

I'm relieved that some of the Dundas Collection will be coming here - permanently, I assume. That little exhibition of it, before the AGO closed, was a gem.

Making connections - dialogues between art of different eras, using contemporary culture as an entry-point to the past, is an approach the ROM has also taken with their prominent placement of art - Jin-Me Yoon's Souvenirs of Self at the entrance to the Sigmund Samuel Gallery for instance.
 

Back
Top