News   May 17, 2024
 199     0 
News   May 17, 2024
 490     0 
News   May 16, 2024
 851     1 

The ‘Manhattanization’ of downtown Toronto

Automation Gallery

Superstar
Member Bio
Joined
May 5, 2007
Messages
12,654
Reaction score
3,279
Location
South Parkdale
You can just feel the energy here.â€:cool:

One of the best things that has happened in Toronto of late has been the surge of office construction downtown. After more than a decade of stagnation in the wake of the 1990s recession, developers have returned to the downtown core all in a rush.

Three big new towers – Telus House, the Bay Adelaide Centre and RBC Centre – led the renaissance. At least three more big projects are rumoured to be in the works. Developers have made space for thousands more workers by renovating older buildings to create inviting “brick-and-beam†offices on the edges of the central business district. In all, says one developer, 4½- million square feet of downtown space has come to market in the past 36 months.

Michael Emory, president of Allied Properties, says that the era when office developers fled to the suburbs in search of cheaper land and lower taxes is ending. Why? Because the smart, younger people that companies most want to attract and keep like to work in the central city, where they can enjoy the bright lights and avoid long commutes. “What the current generation seems to want is the opportunity to live, work and play in the inner city,†says Mr. Emory.

With thickets of new condominiums going up, and offices now coming hot on their heels, Toronto’s downtown is undergoing a kind of Manhattanization, its downtown becoming busier and livelier by the month. It is vital for the city to sustain that momentum, and a new report from the Canadian Urban Institute suggests how.

The report points out that despite all the new building in the past few years, the downtown core still has only about 20 per cent of the office capacity in greater Toronto. Because of the flight of businesses to the suburbs over the past three decades, 905 municipalities now have 66-million square feet of office space, more than Calgary and Edmonton combined. Around 325,000 people work in car-dependent suburban offices. The institute calls that “the single largest contributor to congestion on GTA highways.â€

To encourage developers to build more space downtown, the institute recommends lowering the gap between commercial and residential real estate taxes. The city actually began that process five years ago – an underappreciated move by former mayor David Miller – and the institute wants it speeded up.

It also wants to see the city protect potential office sites downtown. Many of these are being snapped up by condo and hotel developers for projects such as the Shangri-La on University and the Trump tower on Bay. Over the past decade, it says, “the number of sites available for office development in the core has shrunk dramatically, in contrast to the 905 where approval time frames are quicker and where sites are available in abundance…â€

The institute urges governments to cook up a plan to promote the core as an international financial centre. Though plans call for creating 40,000 new jobs in the sector, “there is no accompanying plan for where these jobs are to be housed.â€

The report doesn’t propose to reverse history and move all suburban office jobs back to the core, but it does want to make suburban office clusters work better. To that end, it wants governments to retool their transit plans to deliver more trains to where people actually work. At present, it notes, 108-million square feet of office space is beyond the range of mass transit.

None of these useful thoughts should overshadow the good news of Toronto’s office comeback. Combined with the condo boom, the gentrification of downtown neighbourhoods and the flourishing of arts and culture, it is a remarkable story of urban revival. Planning consultant Barry Lyon has worked downtown for 30 years, “and I have never seen the confluence of positive influences that we’re seeing now. You can just feel the energy here.â€

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...anization-of-downtown-toronto/article1981037/
 
Uh oh "Manhattanization" and "Toronto" in the same sentence. ROCers with reading comprehension issues will have a field day in the comments section.
 
The less we care about what the ROC thinks of us, the more we resemble Manhattan. However, we'll never get that close because we're not an island and we lack all those marvelous bridges. The Loop is about the highest we can aspire to .
 
Even if Toronto had the same population and density Toronto development has in many ways been developed by McCommunities like CityPlace. Vancouver is even worse where everything is so planned that individuality is not tolerated and the downtown reminds one of a auto mall. Toronto's isn't as bad but the analogy is there. Cities need planning but they are best enjoyed when developments happens naturally than by single monster projects.
This is why high density areas like Yorkville is a great place to enjoy while CityPlace, no matter how much shopping and restaurants they create will always just be viewed as a place to live.
A sense of community must be based from the ground up with development and planning to help nurture it it can't be created by just pouring concrete and adding some grass.
 
Few people realize that if Toronto were to more closely resemble Manhattan, the transformation would have to occur almost exclusively in the suburbs. Our city will not be Manhattanized until North York and Scarborough each grow to 2.5 million, and Etobicoke and former Toronto each grow to 1.5 million. That's 8 million people living within Metro's former borders. Sounds high, but it's almost exactly the same population living in the same area as New York's boroughs, excluding Staten Island.

Downtown Toronto is in many ways already Manhattanized, just to a smaller scale (stand at Yonge and King and you may as well be in Manhattan). It's in fact the inner suburbs that need the greatest overhaul.
 
Can't stand Manhattan. Love to visit, but that's that. It'd be a great city with a different attitude.

Had the choice to live there - chose Toronto instead and very happy I did. If Toronto ever becomes Manhattan I'll pack my things and never come back... well, almost never.
 
Toronto most likes to compare itself to Manhattan, but in reality the built form is uniquely Canadian. If you had to pick a city most like Toronto in built form, it would probably be Vancouver.

Dense core that never really hollowed out before being recolonized, surrounded by a mixture of gentrified lowrise areas and gentrifying "regeneration areas" on the fringes, dense suburban nodes, and fairly compact sprawl to the edges. Different aspects orginated in different cities, but the principles are now applied in most Canadian cities.
 
Isn't this like Chicago?

Chicago sprawls into different states! They don't have the same level of suburban intensification that we do. Pretty much when you leave Chicago's downtown area, it's all low rises for hundreds of kilometres.

Something that amazed me was the amount of decrepit warehouse type areas surrounding the downtown core. We have that in Toronto, but ours have been gentrified and turned into desirable areas. In Chicago they remain quite sketchy to this day.
 
I think the lack of any natural boundaries inhibiting Toronto's growth like in Vancouver and NY is the reason it isn't MORE like Manhattan or Hong Kong....even Barcelona to an extent has some natural boundaries.
 
An explosion in garbage, petty crime and prostitutes?

I was thinking more along the lines of embracing both their old and their modern. Transit. Waterfront. Their basic zest for life and positive attitude towards their city. Look what they've achieved in a few short decades, and they are a smaller, poorer city than we are.

We Torontonians are such sad sacks. Hey...we even voted for a mayor that thinks Toronto sucks. What does that say about us? How can we do great things unless we stop being such pessimists?
 
Well, at least we have the square city grid!

Er, not quite anything so specifically urban and systematic. In that light, *Manhattan* is more Barcelonesque than Toronto. (Though we do have the overall county/township settlement grids dating back to John Graves Simcoe onward, *if* that counts...)
 

Back
Top