News   Apr 26, 2024
 2.4K     4 
News   Apr 26, 2024
 588     0 
News   Apr 26, 2024
 1.2K     1 

Rob Ford's Toronto

Status
Not open for further replies.
Just when you thought it couldn't get any scarier, it does! All those who figured city council would never support Ford, now have something new to worry about. Ford's team is getting together their own coalition, that they plan to help get elected to city council, ensuring Ford gets everything he wants. If that ain't scary, I don't know what is.

From The Toronto Star

Frontrunner forms" Rob Ford Party"
Toronto Mayoral Race»
Rob Ford is forming a citywide slate of like-minded candidates to try to win control of city hall.

The Ford team is surveying council contenders across Toronto to gauge their support for the front-runner’s slash-and-save agenda.

Ward by ward, the Ford-friendly candidates will be identified and promoted as part of the campaign brand over the next five weeks.

The strategy marks the first time a mayoral candidate has publicly plugged ideological allies on such a wide scale.

When asked if they were organizing a slate, campaign manager Doug Ford avoided a direct answer.

“You’ll hear that over the next week or so ... but I can assure you of one thing,” he said. “There’s going to be councillors who support Rob Ford.”

Ryerson University politics professor Neil Thomlinson said it looks as though the campaign team is trying to create a Rob Ford party.

“And it’s obvious why he’s doing it. He knows no one on the current council would work with him,” said Thomlinson.

A public opinion poll released this weekend suggested the election is Ford’s to lose. But his critics predict that even if Ford becomes mayor, he wouldn’t have the support to make the changes he has promised.

The controversial conservative has only a handful of allies on the current council. And a group of left-leaning councillors has threatened to form a shadow government if Ford is elected.

Ford’s team sent an email questionnaire to council candidates last week asking if they support the front-runner’s five priorities: abolishing the vehicle registration tax; abolishing the land transfer tax; reducing office budgets for the mayor and councillors, ending sole-source bidding; and cutting the number of councillors in half.

“If one or more of your policy preference aligns with Rob Ford’s, then we would like to hear back from you to schedule a meeting and discuss particularities,” read the uniform email.

Etobicoke Centre candidate John Campbell, a former chair of the Toronto District School Board, met with Ford’s team on Monday.

He said a Ford campaign official told him that every council hopeful would be surveyed eventually.

“I think he’s trying to figure out who he should support to get in, who will help him fulfill his mandate — and I think that’s reasonable. That’s good strategy and good planning,” said Campbell.

“They aren’t looking to endorse anyone, but they will make known candidates who will support what Rob is trying to do.”

Campbell is behind Ford on everything except cutting the size of council.

At first glance, the strategy seems one step closer to bringing party politics to city hall.

Not that these types of arrangements are uncommon in municipal elections, they just are typically not so overt.

Joe Pantalone attends campaign events for left-wing candidates — and vice versa. The provincial Liberals are working behind the scenes in support of Smitherman.

Ford’s own team has been quietly helping conservative candidates, such as Gus Cusimano, who is taking on Maria Augimeri in York Centre.

Of about a dozen council candidates contacted by the Star, roughly half had received the Ford email.

Thomlinson, chair of Ryerson University’s politics and public administration department, said Ford is playing a risky game.

“People in this city are completely allergic to the notion of parties in municipal politics,” said Thomlinson.

“One of the big reasons why is that they think the party will be controlling of those people. And they feel the same way about slates.

“So if he’s trying to line up what amounts to a Rob Ford party, how much individual representing are those people going to do?”

Despite Ford’s popularity — he currently holds a 24-point lead over second-place Smitherman — Thomlinson isn’t convinced an unknown candidate could ride Ford’s coattails to city hall against an incumbent.

“But if (Ford’s) bandwagon holds until election day . . . a pro-Ford slate could make a difference in those wards where there is no returning councillor.”

With files from David Rider
 
Just when you thought it couldn't get any scarier, it does! All those who figured city council would never support Ford, now have something new to worry about. Ford's team is getting together their own coalition, that they plan to help get elected to city council, ensuring Ford gets everything he wants. If that ain't scary, I don't know what is.

Hmmm... I don't know. Maybe a group of lefty councilors ensuring Miller gets everything he wants?
 
This is why I'm fully enjoying this. Although I don't agree with many things Ford is planning (especially cuts to arts funding, waterfront revitalization, removing downtown streetcars) I fully support the fact that he will decimate the left-leaning council, because I (and many Torontonians) have had enough of a bunch of champagne socialists running this city the way they see fit. I will also get a sick pleasure out of watching some members on this board get an aneurysm when Ford takes over.

Those of you who say TC will continue as planned - I have news for you: Hudak will win the provincial elections next year and his first order of business will be to launch the LRT back to the euro-fetish books it was taken from. It has been done before, the province does not care about contracts and penalties - it canceled a semi excavated subway line before, and will do it again.
 
This is why I'm fully enjoying this. Although I don't agree with many things Ford is planning (especially cuts to arts funding, waterfront revitalization, removing downtown streetcars) I fully support the fact that he will decimate the left-leaning council, because I (and many Torontonians) have had enough of a bunch of champagne socialists running this city the way they see fit. I will also get a sick pleasure out of watching some members on this board get an aneurysm when Ford takes over.

Those of you who say TC will continue as planned - I have news for you: Hudak will win the provincial elections next year and his first order of business will be to launch the LRT back to the euro-fetish books it was taken from. It has been done before, the province does not care about contracts and penalties - it canceled a semi excavated subway line before, and will do it again.

Why are you against transit city though?
 
Why are you against transit city though?
Because it threw out decades of transit planning for a Miller pet project. It's insulting to say that years of due dilligence aren't worth the paper they're printed on, but Miller's social engineering transit system is supposed to save Toronto. TC has its positive sides, however castrating Sheppard at Don Mills and building a streetcar tunnel as expensive as a subway under Eglinton (when past studies have always looked at it as a subway corridor) is going too far. Turn those two into subway corridors and I'd support TC fully, but because Miller went for an 'it's all this or nothing' approach, I have no choice but to hate the entire plan. That and falsifying ridership projections on Eglinton, however that's becoming a moot point. I'm surprised no candidate has taken advantage of it.

^But you live in Madrid! I'm sick of having this city run by carpetbaggers!
I used to live in Madrid.. I should really think about changing that... Ya and their subway system really gets me irked when I hear some members on this board raving about LRT... If it was that awesome, then why aren't most cities relying on it?
 
Because it threw out decades of transit planning for a Miller pet project. It's insulting to say that years of due dilligence aren't worth the paper they're printed on, but Miller's social engineering transit system is supposed to save Toronto. TC has its positive sides, however castrating Sheppard at Don Mills and building a streetcar tunnel as expensive as a subway under Eglinton (when past studies have always looked at it as a subway corridor) is going too far. Turn those two into subway corridors and I'd support TC fully, but because Miller went for an 'it's all this or nothing' approach, I have no choice but to hate the entire plan. That and falsifying ridership projections on Eglinton, however that's becoming a moot point. I'm surprised no candidate has taken advantage of it.


I used to live in Madrid.. I should really think about changing that...

Sorry, I am not sure I understand. What's difference between a underground streetcar and a subway? I actually think a rapid transit on Eglinton will be popular, providing it's really "rapid".
 
Sorry, I am not sure I understand. What's difference between a underground streetcar and a subway? I actually think a rapid transit on Eglinton will be popular, providing it's really "rapid".

Since the streetcar tunnel under Eglinton and a full fledged subway are now in similar cost ballparks, it only makes TRANSIT sense to build a subway. Let's check out the advantages:
1) Room for ridership to grow. An underground streetcar with surface operations has severe ridership limitations, and if Eglinton is as successful as some people make it out to be, then we're going to have a very expensive problem on our hands in a decade if an LRT is built.
2) Interconnectivity of the system. Why introduce a new technology, when using one that is already used can greatly increase the TTC's ability to have more reliable subway service? Since all subway lines are operationally interlined for maintenance's sake and moving equipment around, then it gives the system more room to breathe in case of a major accident or disruption.
3) An underground streetcar's capacity and headway is limited by the fact that the surface sections (complete with traffic lights, with no transit priority) are there slowing things up so while the streetcar may theoretically reach subway speeds, the surface sections will ensure that it will be as reliable as the Spadina, or St. Clair, or Queen streetcar... So.. I don't think many people are going to be enjoying that 'rapid' transit line (note the quoted rapid).
 
This is why I'm fully enjoying this. Although I don't agree with many things Ford is planning (especially cuts to arts funding, waterfront revitalization, removing downtown streetcars) I fully support the fact that he will decimate the left-leaning council, because I (and many Torontonians) have had enough of a bunch of champagne socialists running this city the way they see fit. I will also get a sick pleasure out of watching some members on this board get an aneurysm when Ford takes over.

Those of you who say TC will continue as planned - I have news for you: Hudak will win the provincial elections next year and his first order of business will be to launch the LRT back to the euro-fetish books it was taken from. It has been done before, the province does not care about contracts and penalties - it canceled a semi excavated subway line before, and will do it again.


Um, I'm trying to figure out if I'm a "champagne socialist" so can somebody give me a detailed explanation of what that is. I thought I was kind of in the middle of the road but since I'm totally anti-Ford, I might just be confused. On the other hand I hate closed door meetings and that whole Tuggs deal thing. Then again, I love the transformation of Regent Park. Oh god, I'm so confused! I need a label! Help me out champagne socialist experts.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top