News   Nov 22, 2024
 725     1 
News   Nov 22, 2024
 1.3K     5 
News   Nov 22, 2024
 3.3K     8 

Rethinking Yonge and Eglinton

might that land serve some purpose during the construction of the eglinton LRT?


after the LRT is built, increasing density at Y&E should not be impeded.
 
Y/E has been slated for intensification ever since the new OP was a twinkle in Bedford's eye. That's a given, but what must not happen is any pandering to influential developers or residual consideration of the stress that intensification will bring to the neighbourhoods around the area. For example, more residential intensification will have greater local infrastructure consequences than non-residential intensification. Cllr. Walker has some good points on that score.
 
Battle erupts over future of Yonge and Eglinton
Posted: February 04, 2009, 9:56 PM by Barry Hertz
Filed under: City,Neighbourhoods,Real estate
By Allison Hanes, National Post

A fresh battle erupted yesterday for the soul of Yonge and Eglinton.

The city’s proposed official plan for the area, crafted after the bitter fight over two tall condo towers a decade ago, was approved by the city’s planning and growth committee yesterday. But its height restrictions, limiting future development to 40 storeys, still have the neighbourhood’s councillors worried the upper limit could edge much higher — especially when the city looks to off-load a prime piece of midtown real estate.

Councillors Michael Walker (St. Paul’s), Cliff Jenkins (Don Valley West) and Karen Stintz (Eglinton Lawrence) fear without concrete commitments in the official plan, the developers could negotiate even taller towers on the site of a former Toronto Transit Commission bus garage the city is considering selling.

“We’ll end up with another Minto on publicly owned land,†said Mr. Walker, referring to the pair of 50- and 37-storey towers south of Eglinton. “It’s being stripped of all the guarantees that we need.â€

The sale of the TTC yards has been rumoured since the establishment of Build Toronto, a new city agency formed to dispose of city-owned assets that is chaired by Mayor David Miller.

Mr. Miller is in Basel, Switzerland, on business this week, but his office said he doesn’t support the kind of set-in-stone guarantees the councillors for the area are seeking.

“The limitation of height is already contained in the report and the draft zoning bylaw,†said Stuart Green, a spokesman for the Mayor. “It’s really unusual for a future real estate transaction to be contained in the official plan.â€

Ms. Stintz said the objectives of Build Toronto and the community could be on a collision course, since the agency, led by the Mayor, will be looking to maximize the value of the lands, while the community wants some “reasonable†parameters.

“Politically speaking it’s a concern ... because we’re not on the side of the Mayor and the Mayor would not necessarily consider our view strongly with respect to protecting the community, versus making money on the sale of this land,†she said. “It’s rather unfortunate because the community has spent a lot of time and resources and put their faith in this process. And this process may in fact let them down.â€

But Councillor Adam Vaughan (Trinity Spadina), who is himself no proponent of unbridled development, couldn’t resist the urge to point out the irony of fiscally conservative councillors leading the charge to reign in the private sector.

His comments caused an uproar at the meeting and offered a sneak peak of what may be in store for the next sitting of city council, which will consider the plan.

“Councillor Stintz in particular has been flooding the council chambers with motions ... that said we should get it done differently. So I find it really interesting that the first time a piece of property [near] her ward comes up for sale, she says, ‘No, no, no, no, no, not highest and best use, not maximum land values, don’t maximize the return to the taxpayer, protect my community and strata sale it,’ †Mr. Vaughan said.

“Which is it, Karen? Do you want to sell everything at highest and best cost and who cares whose neighbourhood it’s in, or is it just in your neighbourhood you want protection, the rest of the city be damned?â€

The official plan prescribes an urban park, pedestrian walkways, a new north-south side street, low-rise residential housing and mixed-use office and condo towers — all fully integrated with bus routes, the Yonge subway line and a new crosstown light rail line. The maximum height of buildings would angle downward under the proposed guidelines the farther away they are located from the thoroughfares, with up to 40 storeys allowed on Yonge and Eglinton.
 
“Which is it, Karen? Do you want to sell everything at highest and best cost and who cares whose neighbourhood it’s in, or is it just in your neighbourhood you want protection, the rest of the city be damned?â€

Too bad they didn't report what her response was.

AoD
 
If any tower was to ever soar higher than the Quantum towers at Y&E, then I can't see a better location than the old bus yard at Y&E. Actually, a giant office tower here would do wonders for the area which is overburdened by residential anyway.
 
Something like this might make everyone happy.

946_385OMASingapore1.jpg
 
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/...crawl-the-betrayal-of-yonge-and-eglinton.aspx

Urban scrawl: The betrayal of Yonge and Eglinton

By Councillor Michael Walker
Commentary

You have to feel for the residents of the Yonge-Eglinton neighbourhood in midtown Toronto.


In 2002, a late night scheme cooked up in private by a number of Toronto city councillors, including David Miller, paved the way for the surprise approval of the 54- and 37-storey twin towers of the Minto Midtown development at 2195 Yonge St.


Easily the most controversial and vilified project in the history of North Toronto, the political shenanigans associated with it resulted in one councillor being turfed out of office. More importantly, it ushered in a profound local skepticism as to the fairness and propriety of the city’s last-minute planning processes.


In the same year, the new City of Toronto Official Plan was approved. It called for the creation of plans for new growth at the Yonge-Eglinton intersection, and a local working group, including some justifiably wary citizens, began work with the city on new land use regulations and design guidelines to manage future development in their neighbourhood.


One of the plums at stake in this exercise is the large parcel at the southwest corner of the Yonge-Eglinton intersection known as the TTC Bus Terminal lands. City-owned land that has been underutilized for years, and one of the most desirable pieces of redevelopment property in the country, it sits across the street from the Minto monsters, shouldering in their shadow the burden of suspicion and mistrust brought about by previous political hi-jinks.


Over many years, the working group did its job, agreeing to a 40-storey height limit for the land, and development design guidelines to protect the adjacent residential neighbourhoods. Included was the use of a “strata plan†– essentially a horizontal division of land and air rights that enables the city to sell or lease lands to a developer up to a certain height limit, and retain ownership of the air rights above. This tool, which has been used previously by the city, was the thumb in the development dyke that local residents were looking for, and it was agreed to by the working group and the local neighbourhood.


On Oct. 8 last year, Mayor Miller got involved in the neighbourhood again. In announcing the creation of Build Toronto, a city firm mandated to dispose of city-owned assets at their highest value, he cited the TTC Bus Terminal lands as a place where this firm might do its dealing. On Feb. 4, Mayor Miller’s hand-picked Planning and Growth Management Committee all but killed the working group’s pivotal strata plan idea, opening the door once again to uncertainty in future development, and slamming the door shut on citizen respect for the planning process.


As we have come to understand in recent years, the willingness of residents to become active partners with their local government and respected participants in the making of their communities is a very fragile thing. We say that we seek out citizen input because it creates strong communities that are engaged in their own collective well being; it results in better and more responsive decisions that have staying power; and it is democratically the right thing to do.


Today, at Yonge and Eglinton, those fine sentiments ring hollow. Toronto used to be a place where citizen input was genuinely encouraged and attention was paid to the things that mattered to local people. No more. All power is a trust, and this one has been harshly undermined.


As a consequence of last minute, top-down interference by the Mayor and some of his fellow travelers, it would surprise no one if residents threw up their hands in exasperation and walked away from civic engagement altogether, which may have been the back room intent in the first place.

• Michael Walker is Toronto city councillor for Ward 22 (St. Pauls)
 
You have to feel for the residents of the Yonge-Eglinton neighbourhood in midtown Toronto.

Boo hoo. Walker and Stintz have no problems when other neigbhourhoods had to "suffer" all in the name of economic development, but god forbid should someone maximize value of public lands in a key node at their turf. And it wasn't like they are proposing to level the extant neigbhourhood (read: single detached housing) anyways.

I can't wait to see when the bogeyman of traffic is brought up. Should be anytime now.

AoD
 
Last edited:
Yonge and Eglinton needs this redevelopment, and the citizens that come out against this only have their personal interests invested, and not the neighbourhood's.
 
I agree with AoD! Yonge/Eglinton is a major node for transit which makes it ripe for density and development in a rapidly growing city. To deny this to appease a small minority of people in older lowrise housing in the area would be incredibly short-sighted.
 
Haha. Yeah, as a resident of the area I really struggle with the grinding poverty and sense of hopelessness that grips Yonge and Eglinton.

Walker is a master manipulator of the area Nimbys. He gets everyone terrified over an issue and proclaims himself their champion who will battle the evils of City Hall and the OMB on their behalf.
 
Source: http://www.worldarchitecturenews.com/index.php?fuseaction=wanappln.projectview&upload_id=11200

Toronto City Council approves Yonge Eglinton Secondary plan

11200_1_yonge1big.jpg


11200_2_yonge2big.jpg


Toronto City Council have approved a new Secondary Plan for the redevelopment of The Yonge Eglinton Centre, one of the city’s main transit interchanges. The plan is the result of a four year staff lead working group which involved members of the community, developers, adjacent land owners and the Toronto Transit Commission.

The goal of the Yonge Eglinton Master plan and Urban Design Guidelines is to outline how the area will develop over time whilst improving the environment and the quality of life for those that live, work and visit the Centre. The new plan for Yonge-Eglinton sets out a growth strategy which will result in a high quality public realm with improved public transit and local amenities which will create a positive climate for economic growth.

The Yonge-Eglinton Centre has potential for new development through infill and redevelopment of key sites as well as lower scale development on the Avenues that radiate out from the Centre. Through redevelopment the subway station will be upgraded with a new bus terminal and improved access to the subway platforms as well as potential connections to the planned Eglinton Crosstown L.R.T.

The master plan and urban design guidelines are a framework, which will be used by the City to shape the form and layout of new development in the area. The Master Plan represents how future roads; transit stations, parks and buildings will be arranged in the creation of a new transit based high-density neighbourhood. The urban design guidelines include a detailed design vision for the 4.5 hectare quadrant on the south west corner of the Yonge Eglinton intersection. “Part of our challenge,” according to Architect James Parakh, The City’s senior urban designer involved with the working group, “was to fit development on a block into the diverse context of Yonge and Eglinton”. The Plan contemplates a range of scales and activities to help development fit into the context of the block. These range from 120 meter high mixed-use buildings at the main intersection to 3 storey town homes adjacent to the existing single family neighbourhoods. “How we make that transition from the urban scale to the neighbourhood scale was one of the key aspects discussed by the working group,” adds Parakh.

The Plan also contemplates new roads, street-scapes, public art and a new park which will become the focal point of the community. The new park is one of the key elements of the proposed Yonge-Eglinton Master Plan. “In an urbanized environment there are few opportunities available to secure public parkland,” says Joe Nanos, Planning manager involved with the working group. “The Working Group felt that the creation of a new public park should be a high priority”.
 

Back
Top