News   May 03, 2024
 1K     1 
News   May 03, 2024
 640     0 
News   May 03, 2024
 304     0 

World's First, Building in Motion

wow, just when you thought things couldnt be any more over the top... what a crazy gimmick. As others point out Dubai continues to be the worst example for human extravagance. Besides that, it looks like a design and engineering nightmare! that cement core would have to be exceptionally strong.
 
Ferrari?

dynamictower4re6.jpg



Has anyone asked who stores their Ferrari in their living room... in their high rise condo?
 
maybe it's one of those race car beds? part of the whole motion motif?
 
Building in motion

http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/World/2008/06/24/5975081-ap.html


World's 1st 'building in motion' planned
By David Caruso, THE ASSOCIATED PRESS




This artist rendering released by Dynamic Architecture shows a rotating skyscraper that is to be built in Dubai. THE ASSOCIATED PRESS/Dynamic Architecture
NEW YORK - Is it real or science fiction?

An Italian architect said he is poised to start construction on a new skyscraper in Dubai that will be "the world's first building in motion," an 80-storey tower with revolving floors that give it an ever-shifting shape.

The spinning floors, hung like rings around an immobile cement core, would offer residents a constantly changing view of the Persian Gulf and the city's futuristic skyline.

A few penthouse villas would spin on command using a voice-activated computer. The motion of the rest of the building would be choreographed in patterns that could be altered over time.

Speaking at a news conference in New York on Tuesday, the building's designer, David Fisher, declared that his tower will revolutionize the way skyscrapers are made - a claim that might strike some as excessively bold.

Fisher acknowledges that he is not well known, has never built a skyscraper before and hasn't practised architecture regularly in decades.




But he insisted his lack of experience wouldn't stop him from completing the project, which has attracted top design talent, including Leslie Robertson, the structural engineer for the World Trade Center and the Shanghai World Financial Centre.

"I did not design skyscrapers, but I feel ready to do so," Fisher said.

Twisting floors are just one of several futuristic features in the building, the first of several Fisher hopes to build with a similar design.

Giant wind turbines installed between every floor, he said, will generate enough electricity to power the entire building, and lifts will allow penthouse residents to park their cars right in their apartments.

A second version of the tower, to be built in Moscow, would have a retractable helicopter pad. Both structures, at 400 metres, would be taller than the Empire State Building.

Even the method of construction would be unorthodox.

Fisher said each floor will be prefabricated in an Italian factory, then shipped to the site to be attached to the core. Assembling a building in this fashion, he said, will require only 80 technicians and take only 20 months, saving tens of millions of dollars, for a total cost of $700 million to build.

On its face, the project seems to pose a number of complicated engineering puzzles.

How would the plumbing hookups work in an apartment that is constantly moving? Fisher said the pipes will connect to the core via attachments similar to the ones used by military aircraft for in-flight refuelling.

Wouldn't people get dizzy? No, says Fisher. The rotations will be slow enough that no one will notice.

With so many moving parts, wouldn't the building be a maintenance nightmare? Fisher said the building's modular construction will allow easy access to parts that need to be replaced.

Robertson, who attended Tuesday's news conference, said that the skyscraper might be unusual, but is "absolutely" buildable.

"You can build anything," he said, smiling.

Fisher declined to say exactly where in Dubai the tower will be built or when site work might begin. He insisted, however, that factory production is set to start within weeks and that the tower, which will contain office space, a luxury hotel and apartments, will be complete by 2010.

Sales of individual apartments will begin in September, with asking prices of around $3,000 per square foot. The smallest, at 1,330 square feet, would cost about $4 million and the largest, a 12,900-square-foot villa, $38.7 million.

Skeptics might question Fisher's credentials to pull off the job.

In a biography he had been distributing for months, he said he graduated from the University of Florence in 1976, came to New York in the mid-1980s and later developed hotels and ran a company that specialized in stone and prefabricated construction materials.

The biography also said he received an honorary doctorate from "the Prodeo Institute at Columbia University in New York." No such institution exists, however, and Columbia said it had never awarded Fisher an honorary degree.

Asked to explain the discrepancy, Fisher said, through his New York publicists, that he had been awarded the degree by the Catholic University of Rome during a ceremony in 1994 held at the Cathedral Church of St. John the Divine, which is near Columbia's campus.

Asked again to clarify the name of the school that conferred the degree, Fisher's publicists said in an e-mail that "Dr. Fisher did receive an honorary doctorate in economics from Pre Deo University, but it has been removed from his bio because he wants to be entirely accurate and cannot be with this information."
 
I'm pretty sure that oil accounts for only a small amount of Dubai's wealth.

That's the UAE's long-term goal, anyway. Becoming a world financial capital is one way they're trying to alleviate their dependency on oil revenue.
 
How would the plumbing hookups work in an apartment that is constantly moving? Fisher said the pipes will connect to the core via attachments similar to the ones used by military aircraft for in-flight refuelling.


It would have to be two interlocking channels that formed a ring around the core, with the outer channel being free to rotate around the inner one. That's two major seals for each channel (and you'd need at least a couple channels per floor for all the different service requirements).
 
So, what happens when dust gets in the gears?

My guess: the thing will be built. The thing will rotate for the first, say, year. Then something will break, and there will be haggling over who pays to repair it. Nobody will. Result: stuck in an off-kilter formation, leaving one particularly ugly condo.
 
/\ It does. It's actually a much larger port than one may think as entrepot trade provides the majority of Dubai's money. Hong Kong has played a similar role in China over the years.
 
So, what happens when dust gets in the gears?

My guess: the thing will be built. The thing will rotate for the first, say, year. Then something will break, and there will be haggling over who pays to repair it. Nobody will. Result: stuck in an off-kilter formation, leaving one particularly ugly condo.

Absolutely.

Will people be willing to buy into a condo tower that will likely suffer from massive, massive depreciation? Even if they're breathtakingly wealthy?
 
Hume on twisted tower

Restraint left twisting in the wind

$38.7 million Cost of largest villa.
'When size no longer matters, what's left but motion?'

Jun 29, 2008 04:30 AM
Christopher Hume

Architects have always wanted to move us with their work. Now they can, whether we like it or not.

The Dynamic Architecture Group, a design firm headed by Italian architect David Fisher, claims it has figured out how to design buildings that actually move. The company has done a building for Dubai – where else? – and says it's doing another in Moscow and, it hopes, New York.

Videos released last week show an 80-storey geometric tower with floors that rotate, each independently of the next. The idea is that the building will always be different. Like some unresolved Rubik's Cube, it has an indefinite number of alignments.

From the architects' point of view, this may be fascinating stuff, but one wonders what the effect will be in the real world.

Will anyone even notice?

Most of us have a hard time appreciating a stationary building; how will we respond to ones that incorporate motion and change?

Which leads to the conclusion that the whole notion is little more than an attempt at novelty, a way for overblown cities such as Dubai to outdo everyone, including itself, yet again. In that regard, Moscow seems an equally likely site for such a dubious structure, but have New Yorkers been told what could be in store for them?

Though most of us enjoy rotating restaurants such as the one at the top of the CN Tower, the thrill has usually worn off before dessert arrives.

In the end, what counts is the food. There's a lesson here for architects: Focus less on form and more on content. Create spaces that people want to inhabit, not simply icons that fill the eye.

Besides, let's not pretend there won't be technical problems; they're inevitable. What will happen when your floor gets stuck in mid-revolution just at the point where the view is at its worst?

On the other hand, maybe turning towers should come as no surprise. At a time when architecture has morphed into a spectator sport with players madly vying to outdo one another, such a movable feast had to happen.

Besides, height, the traditional means by which the edifice complex was expressed, has pretty well peaked. What exhilaration can be derived from tall buildings once they end up looking like the latest world record holder, the Burj Dubai? When completed, it will be the tallest building in the world, and the ugliest, higher than our very own CN Tower, which is merely a free-standing structure, something less than a full-fledged building.

When size no longer matters, what's left but motion? Spurred on by builders of the instant cities now changing the face of Asia and the Middle East, designers feel they must reach ever deeper into their bag of tricks to keep up with the speed of change, which Fisher has now managed, literally, to incorporate.

But there's global warming and rising fuel costs. Given that the era of cheap oil is drawing to a close, rotating towers make no sense. Fisher, however, says his towers will generate more power than they use; wind turbines will be placed between all 79 floors, which will allow it to generate more electricity than it uses.

But even before these towers exist, they seem obsolete. Will they be the architectural version of the alarm clock/toaster oven/flashlight that no one could figure out how to use?

Think of the German polymath, Goethe, who famously called architecture "frozen music." Its beauty, when it existed, lay in the fact of its immutability, permanence and ability to address the ages.

It's true a communications tower can be a tourist trap, but even then, how many return for a second visit? On the other hand, we're still lining up to look at the Parthenon, and it hasn't moved an inch in 2,500 years.

------------------

Just after I make the claim in another post that Hume never criticizes anything outside Toronto, here he appears with a critique. Sigh.
 

Back
Top